Technology Distributors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NSIT vs CDW vs PC vs SCSC vs SNX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Restaurants
Technology Distributors
Technology Distributors
NSIT vs CDW vs PC vs SCSC vs SNX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Information Technology Services | Restaurants | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $2.54B | $13.39B | $188M | $1.01B | $19.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.27B | $22.90B | $5M | $3.09B | $62.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $180M | $1.08B | $-1M | $73M | $828M |
| Gross Margin | 22.0% | 21.6% | 16.1% | 13.5% | 6.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | 7.3% | -28.8% | 3.1% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 7.5x | 9.9x | — | 11.6x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.59B | $6.33B | $5M | $147M | $4.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $358M | $619M | $34K | $126M | $2.44B |
NSIT vs CDW vs PC vs SCSC vs SNX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insight Enterprises… (NSIT) | 100 | 38.9 | -61.1% |
| CDW Corporation (CDW) | 100 | 46.3 | -53.7% |
| Premium Catering (H… (PC) | 100 | 22.0 | -78.0% |
| ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) | 100 | 95.6 | -4.4% |
| TD SYNNEX Corporati… (SNX) | 100 | 199.1 | +99.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NSIT vs CDW vs PC vs SCSC vs SNX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NSIT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.38, Low D/E 96.2%, current ratio 1.25x
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 14.3x)
CDW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 2.4%
- Beta 0.91, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.18x
- 4.7% margin vs PC's -28.4%
- 2.4% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SNX's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
PC is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.01 vs SCSC's 1.45
Among these 5 stocks, SCSC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SNX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 25.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.1%
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs NSIT's 250.3%
- 6.9% revenue growth vs SCSC's -6.7%
- +103.5% vs CDW's -40.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs SCSC's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 14.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.7% margin vs PC's -28.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs SCSC's 1.45 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SNX's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.5% vs CDW's -40.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs PC's -20.4%, ROIC 15.4% vs -22.3% |
NSIT vs CDW vs PC vs SCSC vs SNX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NSIT vs CDW vs PC vs SCSC vs SNX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CDW leads in 2 of 6 categories
NSIT leads 1 • SNX leads 1 • PC leads 0 • SCSC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NSIT and CDW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNX is the larger business by revenue, generating $62.5B annually — 12104.8x PC's $5M. CDW is the more profitable business, keeping 4.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PC's -28.4%. On growth, SNX holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.3B | $22.9B | $5M | $3.1B | $62.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $477M | $1.9B | — | $114M | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $180M | $1.1B | — | $73M | $828M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $235M | $1.1B | — | $124M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +21.6% | +16.1% | +13.5% | +6.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +7.3% | -28.8% | +3.1% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +4.7% | -28.4% | +2.4% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +4.7% | +11.5% | +4.0% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.2% | +9.2% | — | +8.8% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | +7.7% | — | +5.4% | +32.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NSIT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.0x trailing earnings, CDW trades at a 46% valuation discount to SNX's 24.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NSIT's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SNX's 11.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $13.4B | $188M | $1.0B | $19.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.8B | $19.1B | $192M | $1.0B | $21.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.24x | 12.97x | -19.56x | 15.30x | 24.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.55x | 9.91x | — | 11.65x | 14.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.58x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.83x | 9.79x | — | 8.91x | 11.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 0.60x | 46.20x | 0.33x | 0.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.64x | 5.31x | — | 1.21x | 2.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.11x | 12.30x | 401.21x | 9.68x | 13.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CDW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CDW delivers a 42.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $8 for SCSC. SCSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CDW's 2.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCSC scores 7/9 vs PC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.2% | +42.4% | — | +8.1% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +6.8% | -20.4% | +4.2% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +15.4% | -22.3% | +7.0% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.3% | +18.4% | -47.1% | +7.7% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.96x | 2.43x | — | 0.16x | 0.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $5.7B | $5M | $21M | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $358M | $619M | $34,237 | $126M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $6.3B | $5M | $147M | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.97x | 14.52x | -9.00x | 11.00x | 3.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SNX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SNX five years ago would be worth $20,464 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,808 for PC. Over the past 12 months, SNX leads with a +103.5% total return vs CDW's -40.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNX at 40.6% vs PC's -34.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.2% | -20.8% | 0.0% | +17.5% | +56.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.5% | -40.4% | +5.6% | +19.6% | +103.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.5% | -32.5% | -71.9% | +73.9% | +177.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.5% | -32.2% | -71.9% | +46.7% | +104.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +250.3% | +197.4% | -71.9% | +16.0% | +521.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.3% | -12.3% | -34.5% | +20.3% | +40.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PC and SNX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PC is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SCSC's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNX currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs CDW's 54.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 0.91x | 0.01x | 1.45x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $148.58 | $192.30 | $14.00 | $46.25 | $240.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $63.62 | $104.43 | $5.11 | $33.76 | $115.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.4% | +54.5% | +67.1% | +99.2% | +99.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.3 | 29.4 | 52.3 | 71.1 | 77.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 458K | 1.6M | 407K | 208K | 738K |
Analyst Outlook
CDW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NSIT as "Buy", CDW as "Buy", SCSC as "Hold", SNX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.4% upside for CDW (target: $148) vs -18.4% for SNX (target: $195). For income investors, CDW offers the higher dividend yield at 2.37% vs SNX's 0.74%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $87.50 | $148.20 | — | $43.00 | $195.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 18 | — | 5 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.4% | — | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | 1 | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.49 | — | — | $1.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.9% | +4.9% | 0.0% | +10.6% | +3.2% |
CDW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). NSIT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NSIT vs CDW vs PC vs SCSC vs SNX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NSIT or CDW or PC or SCSC or SNX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the stronger pick with 6.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). CDW Corporation (CDW) offers the better valuation at 13. 0x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Insight Enterprises, Inc. (NSIT) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NSIT or CDW or PC or SCSC or SNX?
On trailing P/E, CDW Corporation (CDW) is the cheapest at 13.
0x versus TD SYNNEX Corporation at 24. 0x. On forward P/E, Insight Enterprises, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NSIT or CDW or PC or SCSC or SNX?
Over the past 5 years, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) delivered a total return of +104.
6%, compared to -71. 9% for Premium Catering (Holdings) Limited (PC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNX returned +521. 4% versus PC's -71. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NSIT or CDW or PC or SCSC or SNX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Premium Catering (Holdings) Limited (PC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
01β versus ScanSource, Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning SCSC is approximately 11309% more volatile than PC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 2% for CDW Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NSIT or CDW or PC or SCSC or SNX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is pulling ahead at 6.
9% versus -6. 7% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TD SYNNEX Corporation grew EPS 25. 2% year-over-year, compared to -21. 1% for Premium Catering (Holdings) Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNX leads at 0. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NSIT or CDW or PC or SCSC or SNX?
CDW Corporation (CDW) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
8% net margin versus -28. 4% for Premium Catering (Holdings) Limited — meaning it keeps 4. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CDW leads at 7. 4% versus -28. 8% for PC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDW leads at 21. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NSIT or CDW or PC or SCSC or SNX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Insight Enterprises, Inc.
(NSIT) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for TD SYNNEX Corporation — 6. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDW: 41. 4% to $148. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — NSIT or CDW or PC or SCSC or SNX?
In this comparison, CDW (2.
4% yield), SNX (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. NSIT, PC, SCSC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NSIT or CDW or PC or SCSC or SNX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Premium Catering (Holdings) Limited (PC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
01)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PC: -71. 9%, SCSC: +16. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NSIT and CDW and PC and SCSC and SNX?
These companies operate in different sectors (NSIT (Technology) and CDW (Technology) and PC (Consumer Cyclical) and SCSC (Technology) and SNX (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NSIT is a small-cap deep-value stock; CDW is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SCSC is a small-cap deep-value stock; SNX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CDW, SNX pay a dividend while NSIT, PC, SCSC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.