NTB vs CATY

For growth investors, Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) is the stronger pick with -0.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB). The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, The Bank of N.

T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus Cathay General Bancorp at 12. 6x. On forward P/E, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited wins at 0. 67x versus Cathay General Bancorp's 1. 09x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, The Bank of N.

T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to +51. 2% for Cathay General Bancorp (CATY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTB returned +191. 3% versus CATY's +137. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Bank of N.

T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Cathay General Bancorp's 1. 04β — meaning CATY is approximately 60% more volatile than NTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 7% for Cathay General Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) is pulling ahead at -0.

4% versus -2. 0% for The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited grew EPS 16. 1% year-over-year, compared to 14. 9% for Cathay General Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Bank of N.

T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 0% net margin versus 22. 8% for Cathay General Bancorp — meaning it keeps 29. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTB leads at 29. 8% versus 29. 4% for CATY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTB leads at 75. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 67x versus Cathay General Bancorp's 1. 09x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for Cathay General Bancorp — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTB: 1. 4% to $57. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 3%, versus 2. 4% for Cathay General Bancorp (CATY).

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Bank of N.

T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 3. 3% yield, +191. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTB: +191. 3%, CATY: +137. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.