Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.21B | $3.71B | $3.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $800M | $1.36B | $1.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $232M | $287M | $302M |
| Gross Margin | 75.9% | 74.7% | 97.5% |
| Operating Margin | 29.8% | 28.0% | 37.0% |
| Forward P/E | 8.8x | 11.5x | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $39M | $303M | $776M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.61B | $1.33B | $358M |
NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Bank of N.T. Bu… (NTB) | 100 | 226.6 | +126.6% |
| WSFS Financial Corp… (WSFS) | 100 | 254.5 | +154.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 3.3%
- Rev growth -2.0%, EPS growth 16.1%
- 187.7% 10Y total return vs WSFS's 123.0%
WSFS is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.4% vs NTB's 2.6%
FIBK is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 5.5% yield, vs NTB's 3.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.0% NII/revenue growth vs FIBK's -28.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.65 vs 0.66 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs FIBK's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs WSFS's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, vs NTB's 3.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.0% vs FIBK's +2.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs FIBK's 0.6% |
NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIBK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSFS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 1.7x NTB's $800M. NTB is the more profitable business, keeping 29.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WSFS's 21.1%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $800M | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $267M | $408M | $428M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $232M | $287M | $302M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $255M | $214M | $278M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.9% | +74.7% | +97.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.8% | +28.0% | +37.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +21.1% | +28.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +15.7% | +26.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.4% | +22.9% | +116.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NTB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.1x trailing earnings, NTB trades at a 27% valuation discount to WSFS's 13.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTB offers better value at 0.75x vs FIBK's 3.86x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $3.7B | $3.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $644M | $2.7B | $3.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.12x | 13.84x | 11.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.76x | 11.53x | 12.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.75x | 0.79x | 3.86x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.42x | 6.59x | 9.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.76x | 2.73x | 3.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.06x | 1.41x | 1.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.68x | 17.38x | 12.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTB delivers a 21.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $9 for FIBK. NTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FIBK's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTB scores 8/9 vs WSFS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.2% | +10.6% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +1.4% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.9% | +9.5% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +10.3% | +4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.11x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.6B | -$1.0B | $418M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $1.3B | $358M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $303M | $776M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.23x | 1.30x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTB five years ago would be worth $17,083 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,099 for FIBK. Over the past 12 months, NTB leads with a +35.0% total return vs FIBK's +2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTB at 36.6% vs FIBK's 3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.4% | +28.6% | -1.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.0% | +29.5% | +2.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.0% | +138.5% | +11.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.8% | +45.4% | +21.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +187.7% | +123.0% | +39.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.6% | +33.6% | +3.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NTB and WSFS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WSFS's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSFS currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs FIBK's 88.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 0.87x | — |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.84 | $73.22 | $39.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.59 | $49.92 | $31.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.7% | +96.2% | +88.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.9 | 55.7 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 145K | 388K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NTB and FIBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NTB as "Hold", WSFS as "Hold", FIBK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 12.2% upside for WSFS (target: $79) vs 3.0% for NTB (target: $57). For income investors, FIBK offers the higher dividend yield at 5.46% vs WSFS's 0.97%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.00 | $79.00 | $38.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 13 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +1.0% | +5.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.83 | $0.68 | $1.89 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.6% | +7.8% | +3.6% |
NTB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FIBK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTB or WSFS or FIBK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the stronger pick with -2. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 5% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTB or WSFS or FIBK?
On trailing P/E, The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the cheapest at 10. 1x versus WSFS Financial Corporation at 13. 8x. On forward P/E, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited is actually cheaper at 8. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited wins at 0. 65x versus First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. 's 4. 23x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTB or WSFS or FIBK?
Over the past 5 years, The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) delivered a total return of +70. 8%, compared to +21. 0% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTB returned +187. 7% versus FIBK's +39. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTB or WSFS or FIBK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus WSFS Financial Corporation's 0. 87β — meaning WSFS is approximately 34% more volatile than NTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 23% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTB or WSFS or FIBK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is pulling ahead at -2. 0% versus -28. 5% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. grew EPS 34. 2% year-over-year, compared to 15. 4% for WSFS Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTB or WSFS or FIBK?
The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 0% net margin versus 21. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 29. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FIBK leads at 37. 0% versus 28. 0% for WSFS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FIBK leads at 97. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NTB or WSFS or FIBK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 65x versus First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. 's 4. 23x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 12. 9x for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WSFS: 12. 2% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NTB or WSFS or FIBK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 1. 0% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS).
09Is NTB or WSFS or FIBK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 3. 3% yield, +187. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTB: +187. 7%, FIBK: +39. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NTB and WSFS and FIBK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.