Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NTRB vs CLRB vs PRTC vs DARE vs PRGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
NTRB vs CLRB vs PRTC vs DARE vs PRGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $46M | $14M | $41M | $25M | $1.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $0.00 | $9M | $-57K | $4.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-22M | $-56M | $-17M | $-1.82B |
| Gross Margin | 24.9% | — | -196.2% | -1461.1% | 34.2% |
| Operating Margin | -408.4% | — | -26.2% | -2396.9% | -4.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 5.6x |
| Total Debt | $210K | $410K | $20M | $1M | $3.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $13M | $254M | $16M | $532M |
NTRB vs CLRB vs PRTC vs DARE vs PRGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nutriband Inc. (NTRB) | 100 | 70.6 | -29.4% |
| Cellectar Bioscienc… (CLRB) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| PureTech Health plc (PRTC) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
| Daré Bioscience, In… (DARE) | 100 | 16.6 | -83.4% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 26.0 | -74.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTRB vs CLRB vs PRTC vs DARE vs PRGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTRB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -34.0% 10Y total return vs PRTC's -55.9%
CLRB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and quality is your priority.
- 51.3% revenue growth vs DARE's -99.7%
- 2.9% margin vs DARE's -414.3%
PRTC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 6.5%, current ratio 6.59x
- Beta 0.51, current ratio 6.59x
- -9.9% ROA vs CLRB's -146.9%
DARE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and stability.
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.48 vs CLRB's 1.76
- +0.7% vs CLRB's -55.0%
PRGO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 9.8%
- Rev growth -2.8%, EPS growth -7.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.5%
- 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.3% revenue growth vs DARE's -99.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.9% margin vs DARE's -414.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs CLRB's 1.76 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +0.7% vs CLRB's -55.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -9.9% ROA vs CLRB's -146.9% |
NTRB vs CLRB vs PRTC vs DARE vs PRGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NTRB vs CLRB vs PRTC vs DARE vs PRGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRGO leads in 2 of 6 categories
DARE leads 1 • PRTC leads 1 • NTRB leads 1 • CLRB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO and DARE operate at a comparable scale, with $4.2B and -$57,130 in trailing revenue. PRGO is the more profitable business, keeping -43.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DARE's -414.3%. On growth, PRGO holds the edge at -7.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $0 | $9M | -$57,130 | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$23M | -$228M | -$16M | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$22M | -$56M | -$17M | -$1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$23M | -$219M | -$7M | $108M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | — | -196.2% | -1461.1% | +34.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | — | -26.2% | -2396.9% | -4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | — | -6.2% | -414.3% | -43.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | — | -24.4% | +492.8% | +2.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.6% | — | -30.5% | -94.6% | -7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.4% | +25.6% | -8.7% | +49.2% | -56.4% |
Valuation Metrics
DARE leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46M | $14M | $41M | $25M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $42M | $1M | -$193M | $11M | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.47x | -0.40x | -0.37x | -6.06x | -1.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 5.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 7.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 22.66x | — | 8.79x | 2587.71x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.61x | 0.87x | 0.13x | — | 0.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 5.25x | 11.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRTC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRTC delivers a -16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-16 in annual profit, vs $-6 for DARE. NTRB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGO's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRTC scores 5/9 vs CLRB's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -118.3% | -2.5% | -16.1% | -6.1% | -50.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -101.9% | -146.9% | -9.9% | -56.8% | -19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.7% | — | -66.9% | — | +3.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -125.5% | -174.7% | -18.8% | -36.2% | +4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.04x | 0.06x | — | 1.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$13M | -$234M | -$14M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $13M | $254M | $16M | $532M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $209,629 | $409,586 | $20M | $1M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -369.11x | — | -1.16x | -35.60x | -7.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTRB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTRB five years ago would be worth $6,603 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $81 for CLRB. Over the past 12 months, DARE leads with a +0.7% total return vs CLRB's -55.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRB at 3.5% vs CLRB's -57.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.4% | -4.9% | +2.0% | +49.2% | -13.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.4% | -55.0% | -2.6% | +0.7% | -51.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.8% | -92.4% | -41.3% | -75.8% | -58.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.0% | -99.2% | -70.1% | -82.4% | -60.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.0% | -99.9% | -55.9% | -99.0% | -77.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.5% | -57.7% | -16.3% | -37.6% | -25.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRTC and DARE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DARE is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLRB's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRTC currently trades 85.2% from its 52-week high vs CLRB's 16.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 1.76x | 0.51x | 0.48x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.68 | $20.59 | $19.92 | $9.19 | $28.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.42 | $2.43 | $14.50 | $1.27 | $9.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.4% | +16.0% | +85.2% | +31.7% | +41.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 71.7 | 48.2 | 70.2 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 1.2M | 8K | 581K | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
PRGO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRTC as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 235.9% upside for PRTC (target: $57) vs 70.6% for PRGO (target: $20). PRGO is the only dividend payer here at 9.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $57.00 | — | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 2 | — | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +9.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | — | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PRGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). DARE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NTRB vs CLRB vs PRTC vs DARE vs PRGO: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTRB or CLRB or PRTC or DARE or PRGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) is the stronger pick with -2.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -99. 7% for Daré Bioscience, Inc. (DARE). Analysts rate PureTech Health plc (PRTC) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NTRB or CLRB or PRTC or DARE or PRGO?
Over the past 5 years, Nutriband Inc.
(NTRB) delivered a total return of -34. 0%, compared to -99. 2% for Cellectar Biosciences, Inc. (CLRB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTRB returned -34. 0% versus CLRB's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NTRB or CLRB or PRTC or DARE or PRGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Daré Bioscience, Inc.
(DARE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus Cellectar Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning CLRB is approximately 268% more volatile than DARE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nutriband Inc. (NTRB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 135% for Perrigo Company plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NTRB or CLRB or PRTC or DARE or PRGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) is pulling ahead at -2.
8% versus -99. 7% for Daré Bioscience, Inc. (DARE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Daré Bioscience, Inc. grew EPS 88. 4% year-over-year, compared to -24. 0% for PureTech Health plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRTC leads at 30. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NTRB or CLRB or PRTC or DARE or PRGO?
Cellectar Biosciences, Inc.
(CLRB) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -414. 3% for Daré Bioscience, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRGO leads at 8. 1% versus -2396. 9% for DARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRTC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NTRB or CLRB or PRTC or DARE or PRGO more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTC: 235.
9% to $57. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — NTRB or CLRB or PRTC or DARE or PRGO?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield) pays a dividend. NTRB, CLRB, PRTC, DARE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is NTRB or CLRB or PRTC or DARE or PRGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PureTech Health plc (PRTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51)). Cellectar Biosciences, Inc. (CLRB) carries a higher beta of 1. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRTC: -55. 9%, CLRB: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NTRB and CLRB and PRTC and DARE and PRGO?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NTRB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLRB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DARE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. PRGO pays a dividend while NTRB, CLRB, PRTC, DARE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.