Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NTRS vs BEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
NTRS vs BEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $30.26B | $16.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.30B | $8.77B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.74B | $812M |
| Gross Margin | 56.5% | 80.3% |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | 6.9% |
| Forward P/E | 15.1x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $16.43B | $13.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61.13B | $3.57B |
NTRS vs BEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Trust Corp… (NTRS) | 100 | 206.7 | +106.7% |
| Franklin Resources,… (BEN) | 100 | 165.1 | +65.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTRS vs BEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 173.7% 10Y total return vs BEN's 24.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, current ratio 0.41x
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BEN's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
BEN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.31, yield 4.3%
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth 7.1%
- Beta 1.31, yield 4.3%, current ratio 2.71x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.5% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 15.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BEN's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.14 vs BEN's 1.31 | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs NTRS's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +71.8% vs BEN's +61.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BEN's 0.7% |
NTRS vs BEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NTRS vs BEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTRS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTRS is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.3B annually — 1.6x BEN's $8.8B. NTRS is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BEN's 6.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14.3B | $8.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.2B | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | $812M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.7B | $938M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.5% | +80.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +6.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NTRS and BEN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.7x trailing earnings, NTRS trades at a 45% valuation discount to BEN's 34.2x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30.3B | $16.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$14.4B | $25.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.68x | 34.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.10x | 11.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.89x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -4.49x | 22.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.12x | 1.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.38x | 1.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.54x | 17.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NTRS and BEN each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTRS delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for BEN. BEN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.94x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTRS's 1.27x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.4% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.27x | 0.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$44.7B | $9.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61.1B | $3.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16.4B | $13.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 15.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTRS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTRS five years ago would be worth $14,998 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,965 for BEN. Over the past 12 months, NTRS leads with a +71.8% total return vs BEN's +61.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRS at 33.2% vs BEN's 11.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.8% | +32.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +71.8% | +61.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +136.1% | +37.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.0% | +9.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.7% | +24.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.2% | +11.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NTRS and BEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTRS is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEN's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEN currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs NTRS's 94.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $173.19 | $31.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $96.28 | $19.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.3% | +99.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.1 | 75.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 5.1M |
Analyst Outlook
BEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NTRS as "Hold" and BEN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -5.8% upside for NTRS (target: $154) vs -7.7% for BEN (target: $29). For income investors, BEN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.26% vs NTRS's 1.92%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $153.75 | $28.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.14 | $1.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.2% | +1.5% |
NTRS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BEN leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
NTRS vs BEN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTRS or BEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Franklin Resources, Inc.
(BEN) is the stronger pick with 3. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) offers the better valuation at 18. 7x trailing P/E (15. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) a "Hold" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTRS or BEN?
On trailing P/E, Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) is the cheapest at 18.
7x versus Franklin Resources, Inc. at 34. 2x. On forward P/E, Franklin Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTRS or BEN?
Over the past 5 years, Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) delivered a total return of +50.
0%, compared to +9. 7% for Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTRS returned +173. 7% versus BEN's +24. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTRS or BEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
14β versus Franklin Resources, Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning BEN is approximately 15% more volatile than NTRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 94% versus 127% for Northern Trust Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTRS or BEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Franklin Resources, Inc.
(BEN) is pulling ahead at 3. 5% versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Franklin Resources, Inc. grew EPS 7. 1% year-over-year, compared to -10. 5% for Northern Trust Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTRS or BEN?
Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
1% net margin versus 6. 0% for Franklin Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTRS leads at 16. 3% versus 6. 9% for BEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BEN leads at 80. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NTRS or BEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Franklin Resources, Inc.
(BEN) trades at 11. 4x forward P/E versus 15. 1x for Northern Trust Corporation — 3. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTRS: -5. 8% to $153. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — NTRS or BEN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 1. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS).
09Is NTRS or BEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
14), 1. 9% yield, +173. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTRS: +173. 7%, BEN: +24. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NTRS and BEN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NTRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BEN is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.