Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NUKK vs FLYW vs EVTC vs WEX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
NUKK vs FLYW vs EVTC vs WEX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $2M | $2.12B | $1.44B | $5.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $188.60B | $951M | $2.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-71M | $12.54B | $133M | $310M |
| Gross Margin | 16.9% | 0.2% | 46.4% | 57.4% |
| Operating Margin | -239.8% | 5.7% | 19.1% | 24.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 49.5x | 6.0x | 7.4x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $0.00 | $1.13B | $4.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4K | $330M | $306M | $906M |
NUKK vs FLYW vs EVTC vs WEX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK) | 100 | 2.2 | -97.8% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 35.8 | -64.2% |
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 65.0 | -35.0% |
| WEX Inc. (WEX) | 100 | 76.2 | -23.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NUKK vs FLYW vs EVTC vs WEX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NUKK plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
FLYW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 26.6%, EPS growth 391.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.1%
- 26.6% revenue growth vs NUKK's -63.5%
- +62.7% vs NUKK's -91.5%
EVTC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 89.5% 10Y total return vs WEX's 60.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 2.07x
- Beta 0.76, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.07x
- Lower P/E (6.0x vs 7.4x)
WEX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.16
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.6% revenue growth vs NUKK's -63.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 7.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs NUKK's -144.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs NUKK's 2.26 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.7% vs NUKK's -91.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs NUKK's -5.4% |
NUKK vs FLYW vs EVTC vs WEX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NUKK vs FLYW vs EVTC vs WEX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WEX leads in 3 of 6 categories
EVTC leads 2 • NUKK leads 0 • FLYW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WEX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW and NUKK operate at a comparable scale, with $188.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. EVTC is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NUKK's -144.1%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $188.6B | $951M | $2.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$168M | $10.8B | $316M | $952M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$71M | $12.5B | $133M | $310M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$15.8B | $145M | $460M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +0.2% | +46.4% | +57.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +5.7% | +19.1% | +24.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -144.1% | +6.6% | +13.9% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -64.6% | -8.4% | +15.2% | +17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +1408.6% | +8.4% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.5% | +4.0% | -24.0% | +22.7% |
Valuation Metrics
EVTC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, EVTC trades at a 93% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EVTC's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLYW's 47.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $2.1B | $1.4B | $5.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $1.8B | $2.3B | $9.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.26x | 161.18x | 10.62x | 17.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 49.50x | 5.97x | 7.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.18x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 47.80x | 7.34x | 8.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 3.40x | 1.54x | 1.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.71x | 2.11x | 4.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.41x | 10.62x | 15.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EVTC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WEX delivers a 27.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $6 for FLYW. EVTC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.58x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WEX's 3.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVTC scores 7/9 vs NUKK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +5.9% | +18.7% | +27.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | +4.3% | +6.1% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +2.1% | +10.2% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +1.3% | +10.5% | +13.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 1.58x | 3.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | -$330M | $824M | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3,678 | $330M | $306M | $906M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $0 | $1.1B | $4.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -76.40x | 1.84x | 3.10x | 2.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WEX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WEX five years ago would be worth $7,345 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $220 for NUKK. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +62.7% total return vs NUKK's -91.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WEX at -6.5% vs NUKK's -72.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -70.1% | +27.6% | -18.4% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -91.5% | +62.7% | -31.9% | +19.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.0% | -40.1% | -31.7% | -18.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -49.5% | -43.3% | -26.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -49.5% | +89.5% | +60.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -72.9% | -15.7% | -11.9% | -6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLYW and EVTC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EVTC is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NUKK's 2.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs NUKK's 4.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.26x | 1.32x | 0.76x | 1.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.21 | $18.05 | $38.56 | $186.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.20 | $9.79 | $22.83 | $120.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.8% | +98.2% | +60.6% | +77.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.5 | 83.0 | 40.6 | 38.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 1.9M | 431K | 518K |
Analyst Outlook
WEX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FLYW as "Buy", EVTC as "Buy", WEX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 58.4% upside for EVTC (target: $37) vs -1.3% for FLYW (target: $18). EVTC is the only dividend payer here at 0.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.50 | $37.00 | $177.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 | 18 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.20 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.7% | +4.8% | +16.0% |
WEX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). EVTC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
NUKK vs FLYW vs EVTC vs WEX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NUKK or FLYW or EVTC or WEX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the stronger pick with 26.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -63. 5% for Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK). EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flywire Corporation (FLYW) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NUKK or FLYW or EVTC or WEX?
On trailing P/E, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, EVERTEC, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NUKK or FLYW or EVTC or WEX?
Over the past 5 years, WEX Inc.
(WEX) delivered a total return of -26. 5%, compared to -97. 8% for Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVTC returned +89. 5% versus NUKK's -97. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NUKK or FLYW or EVTC or WEX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Nukkleus Inc. 's 2. 26β — meaning NUKK is approximately 197% more volatile than EVTC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 158% versus 4% for WEX Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NUKK or FLYW or EVTC or WEX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is pulling ahead at 26.
6% versus -63. 5% for Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to 12. 9% for WEX Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLYW leads at 29. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NUKK or FLYW or EVTC or WEX?
EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -144. 1% for Nukkleus Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WEX leads at 25. 4% versus -239. 8% for NUKK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLYW leads at 61. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NUKK or FLYW or EVTC or WEX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 43. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVTC: 58. 4% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NUKK or FLYW or EVTC or WEX?
In this comparison, EVTC (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. NUKK, FLYW, WEX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NUKK or FLYW or EVTC or WEX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 0. 8% yield). Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EVTC: +89. 5%, NUKK: -97. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NUKK and FLYW and EVTC and WEX?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NUKK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock; WEX is a small-cap deep-value stock. EVTC pays a dividend while NUKK, FLYW, WEX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.