Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NUKK vs GCMG vs FLYW vs IMXI vs NDAQ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
NUKK vs GCMG vs FLYW vs IMXI vs NDAQ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Asset Management | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $2M | $2.12B | $2.06B | $478M | $50.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $566M | $188.60B | $521M | $8.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-71M | $63M | $12.54B | $33M | $1.91B |
| Gross Margin | 16.9% | 100.0% | 0.2% | 7.6% | 47.9% |
| Operating Margin | -239.8% | 26.5% | 5.7% | -3.8% | 28.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.8x | 41.5x | 10.5x | 22.6x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $480M | $0.00 | $217M | $9.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4K | $242M | $330M | $169M | $814M |
NUKK vs GCMG vs FLYW vs IMXI vs NDAQ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK) | 100 | 2.2 | -97.8% |
| GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) | 100 | 96.9 | -3.1% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 35.8 | -64.2% |
| International Money… (IMXI) | 100 | 103.3 | +3.3% |
| Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) | 100 | 156.9 | +56.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NUKK vs GCMG vs FLYW vs IMXI vs NDAQ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, NUKK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GCMG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.69 vs IMXI's 2.50
- Lower P/E (12.8x vs 41.5x)
- 8.9% ROA vs NUKK's -5.4%
FLYW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 26.6%, EPS growth 391.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.1%
- 26.6% revenue growth vs NUKK's -63.5%
- +54.9% vs NUKK's -91.7%
IMXI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, current ratio 2.51x
- Beta 0.36 vs NUKK's 2.22
NDAQ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 1.2%
- 347.2% 10Y total return vs IMXI's 63.6%
- Beta 0.75, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.01x
- 21.8% margin vs NUKK's -144.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.6% revenue growth vs NUKK's -63.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.8x vs 41.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.8% margin vs NUKK's -144.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.36 vs NUKK's 2.22 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs GCMG's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.9% vs NUKK's -91.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.9% ROA vs NUKK's -5.4% |
NUKK vs GCMG vs FLYW vs IMXI vs NDAQ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NUKK vs GCMG vs FLYW vs IMXI vs NDAQ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GCMG leads in 3 of 6 categories
NDAQ leads 2 • IMXI leads 1 • NUKK leads 0 • FLYW leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GCMG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW and NUKK operate at a comparable scale, with $188.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. NDAQ is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NUKK's -144.1%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $566M | $188.6B | $521M | $8.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$168M | $123M | $10.8B | -$3M | $3.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$71M | $63M | $12.5B | $33M | $1.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $195M | -$15.8B | $16M | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +100.0% | +0.2% | +7.6% | +47.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +26.5% | +5.7% | -3.8% | +28.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -144.1% | +8.0% | +6.6% | +6.3% | +21.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -64.6% | +31.0% | -8.4% | +3.0% | +24.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | — | +1408.6% | -63.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.5% | +4.0% | +4.0% | -38.8% | +33.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GCMG leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, IMXI trades at a 91% valuation discount to FLYW's 156.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GCMG offers better value at 1.46x vs IMXI's 3.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $2.1B | $2.1B | $478M | $50.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $2.4B | $1.7B | $525M | $59.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.26x | 27.05x | 156.64x | 14.69x | 28.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.76x | 41.52x | 10.46x | 22.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.46x | — | 3.51x | 2.69x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.32x | 46.20x | — | 20.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 3.75x | 3.30x | 0.92x | 6.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 17.59x | 2.64x | 2.97x | 4.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.13x | 20.81x | 30.20x | 25.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GCMG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GCMG delivers a 107.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $108 in annual profit, vs $6 for FLYW. NDAQ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.81x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GCMG's 3.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NDAQ scores 9/9 vs NUKK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +107.6% | +5.9% | +22.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | +8.9% | +4.3% | +6.5% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +22.4% | +2.1% | -7.6% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +24.7% | +1.3% | -5.8% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.77x | — | 1.34x | 0.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $238M | -$330M | $48M | $9.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3,678 | $242M | $330M | $169M | $814M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $480M | $0 | $217M | $9.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -76.40x | 13.83x | 1.84x | -1.69x | 14.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NDAQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NDAQ five years ago would be worth $17,125 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $220 for NUKK. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +54.9% total return vs NUKK's -91.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NDAQ at 18.7% vs NUKK's -72.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -70.1% | +1.6% | +24.0% | +3.5% | -7.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -91.7% | -4.2% | +54.9% | +46.3% | +13.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.0% | +63.0% | -41.8% | -38.0% | +67.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | +4.1% | -50.9% | +8.5% | +71.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | +39.0% | -50.9% | +63.6% | +347.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -72.9% | +17.7% | -16.5% | -14.7% | +18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
IMXI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IMXI is the less volatile stock with a 0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NUKK's 2.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMXI currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs NUKK's 4.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.22x | 0.91x | 1.48x | 0.36x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.21 | $13.22 | $18.05 | $15.95 | $101.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.20 | $9.30 | $9.97 | $8.58 | $77.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.8% | +85.9% | +95.5% | +99.5% | +87.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.5 | 61.2 | 83.6 | 48.7 | 51.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 536K | 1.9M | 342K | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
NDAQ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GCMG as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy", IMXI as "Buy", NDAQ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 111.3% upside for GCMG (target: $24) vs 8.8% for FLYW (target: $19). For income investors, NDAQ offers the higher dividend yield at 1.17% vs GCMG's 1.13%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $24.00 | $18.75 | $27.00 | $114.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 19 | 12 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | — | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.13 | — | — | $1.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | +3.8% | +3.4% | +1.2% |
GCMG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NDAQ leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook).
NUKK vs GCMG vs FLYW vs IMXI vs NDAQ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NUKK or GCMG or FLYW or IMXI or NDAQ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the stronger pick with 26.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -63. 5% for Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK). International Money Express, Inc. (IMXI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NUKK or GCMG or FLYW or IMXI or NDAQ?
On trailing P/E, International Money Express, Inc.
(IMXI) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Flywire Corporation at 156. 6x. On forward P/E, International Money Express, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: GCM Grosvenor Inc. wins at 0. 69x versus International Money Express, Inc. 's 2. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NUKK or GCMG or FLYW or IMXI or NDAQ?
Over the past 5 years, Nasdaq, Inc.
(NDAQ) delivered a total return of +71. 3%, compared to -97. 8% for Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NDAQ returned +347. 2% versus NUKK's -97. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NUKK or GCMG or FLYW or IMXI or NDAQ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Money Express, Inc.
(IMXI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 36β versus Nukkleus Inc. 's 2. 22β — meaning NUKK is approximately 525% more volatile than IMXI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 81% versus 4% for GCM Grosvenor Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NUKK or GCMG or FLYW or IMXI or NDAQ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is pulling ahead at 26.
6% versus -63. 5% for Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GCM Grosvenor Inc. grew EPS 1124% year-over-year, compared to -39. 7% for International Money Express, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLYW leads at 29. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NUKK or GCMG or FLYW or IMXI or NDAQ?
Nasdaq, Inc.
(NDAQ) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 8% net margin versus -144. 1% for Nukkleus Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NDAQ leads at 28. 4% versus -239. 8% for NUKK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GCMG leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NUKK or GCMG or FLYW or IMXI or NDAQ more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 69x versus International Money Express, Inc. 's 2. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, International Money Express, Inc. (IMXI) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 41. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 31. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GCMG: 111. 3% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NUKK or GCMG or FLYW or IMXI or NDAQ?
In this comparison, NDAQ (1.
2% yield), GCMG (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. NUKK, FLYW, IMXI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NUKK or GCMG or FLYW or IMXI or NDAQ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nasdaq, Inc.
(NDAQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 2% yield, +347. 2% 10Y return). Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK) carries a higher beta of 2. 22 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NDAQ: +347. 2%, NUKK: -97. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NUKK and GCMG and FLYW and IMXI and NDAQ?
These companies operate in different sectors (NUKK (Technology) and GCMG (Financial Services) and FLYW (Technology) and IMXI (Technology) and NDAQ (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NUKK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GCMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMXI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NDAQ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. GCMG, NDAQ pay a dividend while NUKK, FLYW, IMXI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.