Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NVTS vs MPWR vs ENTG vs POWI vs AMAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
NVTS vs MPWR vs ENTG vs POWI vs AMAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $3.64B | $77.41B | $22.48B | $4.00B | $325.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $40M | $2.79B | $3.24B | $446M | $28.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-134M | $616M | $265M | $17M | $7.00B |
| Gross Margin | 18.4% | 55.2% | 43.2% | 53.9% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | -231.2% | 26.1% | 29.1% | 4.6% | 29.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 73.1x | 41.4x | 55.5x | 37.1x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $24M | $3.89B | $0.00 | $6.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $237M | $1.10B | $360M | $59M | $7.24B |
NVTS vs MPWR vs ENTG vs POWI vs AMAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Navitas Semiconduct… (NVTS) | 100 | 148.3 | +48.3% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 443.6 | +343.6% |
| Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) | 100 | 150.1 | +50.1% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 89.2 | -10.8% |
| Applied Materials, … (AMAT) | 100 | 424.6 | +324.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NVTS vs MPWR vs ENTG vs POWI vs AMAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NVTS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +7.1% vs POWI's +44.4%
MPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 26.4%, EPS growth -65.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.9%
- 24.9% 10Y total return vs AMAT's 20.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.28, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 5.91x
- 26.4% revenue growth vs NVTS's -44.9%
Among these 5 stocks, ENTG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
POWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 2.08, yield 1.2%
- Beta 2.08, yield 1.2%, current ratio 6.51x
- Beta 2.08 vs NVTS's 4.43
- 1.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
AMAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 2.16 vs MPWR's 2.48
- Lower P/E (37.1x vs 41.4x)
- 24.7% margin vs NVTS's -330.7%
- 19.3% ROA vs NVTS's -28.8%, ROIC 33.3% vs -27.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.4% revenue growth vs NVTS's -44.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (37.1x vs 41.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.7% margin vs NVTS's -330.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.08 vs NVTS's 4.43 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.1% vs POWI's +44.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.3% ROA vs NVTS's -28.8%, ROIC 33.3% vs -27.2% |
NVTS vs MPWR vs ENTG vs POWI vs AMAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NVTS vs MPWR vs ENTG vs POWI vs AMAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MPWR leads in 2 of 6 categories
ENTG leads 1 • AMAT leads 1 • POWI leads 1 • NVTS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $28.4B annually — 700.5x NVTS's $40M. AMAT is the more profitable business, keeping 24.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVTS's -3.3%. On growth, MPWR holds the edge at +20.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $40M | $2.8B | $3.2B | $446M | $28.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$77M | $781M | $1.3B | $41M | $8.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$134M | $616M | $265M | $17M | $7.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$48M | $664M | $721M | $85M | $5.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +55.2% | +43.2% | +53.9% | +48.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +26.1% | +29.1% | +4.6% | +29.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +22.1% | +8.2% | +3.7% | +24.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -117.4% | +23.8% | +22.3% | +18.9% | +20.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -38.7% | +20.8% | +5.0% | +2.6% | -3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.7% | -88.4% | +46.3% | -60.0% | +13.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ENTG leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 47.4x trailing earnings, AMAT trades at a 74% valuation discount to POWI's 184.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMAT offers better value at 2.76x vs MPWR's 4.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $77.4B | $22.5B | $4.0B | $325.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $76.3B | $26.0B | $3.9B | $324.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -27.70x | 123.60x | 95.26x | 184.18x | 47.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 73.12x | 41.38x | 55.51x | 37.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.19x | — | — | 2.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 97.90x | 19.81x | 79.69x | 38.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 79.37x | 27.74x | 7.03x | 9.02x | 11.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.32x | 21.56x | 5.68x | 6.01x | 16.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 116.20x | 56.74x | 45.93x | 57.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMAT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMAT delivers a 34.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-33 for NVTS. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENTG's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMAT scores 7/9 vs NVTS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.0% | +17.9% | +6.7% | +2.4% | +34.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.8% | +15.2% | +3.1% | +2.1% | +19.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.2% | +22.2% | +9.3% | +2.4% | +33.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -21.4% | +20.4% | +11.7% | +2.9% | +30.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.01x | 0.98x | — | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$230M | -$1.1B | $3.5B | -$59M | -$686M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $237M | $1.1B | $360M | $59M | $7.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $24M | $3.9B | $0 | $6.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -114.40x | — | 2.47x | — | 35.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $46,617 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,165 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, NVTS leads with a +705.6% total return vs POWI's +44.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPWR at 56.1% vs POWI's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +88.4% | +68.5% | +65.1% | +93.2% | +52.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +705.6% | +148.6% | +88.9% | +44.4% | +164.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.0% | +280.3% | +87.4% | -6.3% | +258.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.0% | +366.2% | +30.4% | -8.3% | +213.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.1% | +2494.7% | +1040.3% | +232.7% | +2014.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.6% | +56.1% | +23.3% | -2.2% | +53.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — POWI and AMAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
POWI is the less volatile stock with a 2.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVTS's 4.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMAT currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs NVTS's 79.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.43x | 2.28x | 2.66x | 2.08x | 2.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.79 | $1662.00 | $159.15 | $78.94 | $432.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.83 | $613.00 | $66.32 | $30.86 | $151.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.8% | +94.8% | +92.8% | +91.0% | +94.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.2 | 71.0 | 63.8 | 76.1 | 66.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26.7M | 577K | 2.4M | 967K | 6.0M |
Analyst Outlook
POWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVTS as "Hold", MPWR as "Buy", ENTG as "Buy", POWI as "Buy", AMAT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for POWI (target: $79) vs -66.3% for NVTS (target: $5). For income investors, POWI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.17% vs ENTG's 0.27%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.32 | $1615.00 | $152.00 | $79.00 | $426.39 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 25 | 26 | 16 | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | +0.3% | +1.2% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 2 | 18 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.90 | $0.40 | $0.84 | $1.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +2.5% | +1.5% |
MPWR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ENTG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NVTS vs MPWR vs ENTG vs POWI vs AMAT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NVTS or MPWR or ENTG or POWI or AMAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the stronger pick with 26. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -44. 9% for Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS). Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) offers the better valuation at 47. 4x trailing P/E (37. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NVTS or MPWR or ENTG or POWI or AMAT?
On trailing P/E, Applied Materials, Inc.
(AMAT) is the cheapest at 47. 4x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 184. 2x. On forward P/E, Applied Materials, Inc. is actually cheaper at 37. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Applied Materials, Inc. wins at 2. 16x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 48x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NVTS or MPWR or ENTG or POWI or AMAT?
Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) delivered a total return of +366. 2%, compared to -8. 3% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPWR returned +24. 9% versus NVTS's +45. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NVTS or MPWR or ENTG or POWI or AMAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 08β versus Navitas Semiconductor Corporation's 4. 43β — meaning NVTS is approximately 112% more volatile than POWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 98% for Entegris, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NVTS or MPWR or ENTG or POWI or AMAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is pulling ahead at 26. 4% versus -44. 9% for Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Applied Materials, Inc. grew EPS 0. 6% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NVTS or MPWR or ENTG or POWI or AMAT?
Applied Materials, Inc.
(AMAT) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 7% net margin versus -254. 7% for Navitas Semiconductor Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMAT leads at 29. 2% versus -190. 0% for NVTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPWR leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NVTS or MPWR or ENTG or POWI or AMAT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 16x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 48x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) trades at 37. 1x forward P/E versus 73. 1x for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. — 36. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 10. 0% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NVTS or MPWR or ENTG or POWI or AMAT?
In this comparison, POWI (1.
2% yield), AMAT (0. 4% yield), MPWR (0. 4% yield), ENTG (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. NVTS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NVTS or MPWR or ENTG or POWI or AMAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Entegris, Inc.
(ENTG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1040% 10Y return). Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENTG: +1040%, AMAT: +20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NVTS and MPWR and ENTG and POWI and AMAT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NVTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ENTG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock. POWI pays a dividend while NVTS, MPWR, ENTG, AMAT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.