Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NWG vs BCS vs HSBC vs DB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Regional
NWG vs BCS vs HSBC vs DB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $30.60B | $79.93B | $305.76B | $60.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $29.48B | $26.82B | $147.86B | $60.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5.83B | $7.05B | $22.29B | $6.93B |
| Gross Margin | 56.3% | 108.6% | 54.6% | 49.9% |
| Operating Margin | 26.1% | 37.3% | 20.3% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.6x | 10.9x | 10.7x | 9.3x |
| Total Debt | $71.83B | $219.94B | $495.79B | $254.81B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85.35B | $229.75B | $286.92B | $171.62B |
NWG vs BCS vs HSBC vs DB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NatWest Group plc (NWG) | 100 | 514.0 | +414.0% |
| Barclays PLC (BCS) | 100 | 411.5 | +311.5% |
| HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) | 100 | 386.0 | +286.0% |
| Deutsche Bank AG (DB) | 100 | 374.6 | +274.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NWG vs BCS vs HSBC vs DB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NWG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 10.3%
- Rev growth 3.2%, EPS growth 27.4%
- NIM 1.8% vs BCS's 0.9%
- 3.2% NII/revenue growth vs BCS's -53.0%
BCS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HSBC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 264.7% 10Y total return vs NWG's 192.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, current ratio 2.62x
- Beta 1.12, yield 3.7%, current ratio 2.62x
- Beta 1.12 vs DB's 1.48, lower leverage
DB is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.08 vs BCS's 0.29
- Lower P/E (9.3x vs 10.7x), PEG 0.08 vs 0.24
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.2% NII/revenue growth vs BCS's -53.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 10.7x), PEG 0.08 vs 0.24 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BCS's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs DB's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 10.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BCS's 3.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.7% vs DB's +20.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BCS's 0.7% |
NWG vs BCS vs HSBC vs DB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NWG leads in 2 of 6 categories
HSBC leads 2 • BCS leads 1 • DB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $147.9B annually — 5.5x BCS's $26.8B. BCS is the more profitable business, keeping 26.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DB's 11.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $29.5B | $26.8B | $147.9B | $60.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.9B | $9.0B | $35.8B | $9.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.8B | $7.1B | $22.3B | $6.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.3% | +108.6% | +54.6% | +49.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +37.3% | +20.3% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +26.7% | +15.1% | +11.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | -30.1% | +17.0% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.3% | +36.0% | +23.5% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
NWG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.2x trailing earnings, NWG trades at a 72% valuation discount to HSBC's 14.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DB offers better value at 0.08x vs HSBC's 0.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30.6B | $79.9B | $305.8B | $60.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.2B | $66.6B | $514.6B | $158.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.19x | 10.44x | 14.71x | 8.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.57x | 10.90x | 10.75x | 9.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.28x | 0.33x | 0.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.01x | 4.66x | 16.11x | 13.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 2.19x | 2.07x | 0.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.54x | 0.80x | 1.69x | 0.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.89x | — | 12.18x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NWG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NWG delivers a 13.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $9 for DB. NWG carries lower financial leverage with a 1.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DB's 3.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWG scores 7/9 vs BCS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.8% | +9.2% | +11.4% | +8.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +0.4% | +0.7% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +2.7% | +4.0% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +1.2% | +1.4% | +1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.69x | 2.81x | 2.68x | 3.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13.5B | -$9.8B | $208.9B | $83.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85.3B | $229.8B | $286.9B | $171.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $71.8B | $219.9B | $495.8B | $254.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.60x | 0.42x | 0.47x | 0.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HSBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HSBC five years ago would be worth $32,570 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23,527 for DB. Over the past 12 months, HSBC leads with a +64.7% total return vs DB's +20.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BCS at 46.5% vs NWG's 37.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.3% | -9.4% | +13.4% | -20.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.0% | +49.0% | +64.7% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +161.1% | +214.4% | +162.1% | +210.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +204.0% | +146.3% | +225.7% | +135.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.4% | +187.7% | +264.7% | +101.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.7% | +46.5% | +37.9% | +45.9% |
Risk & Volatility
HSBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HSBC is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DB's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HSBC currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs DB's 77.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.39x | 1.12x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.36 | $27.70 | $94.80 | $40.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.76 | $15.88 | $56.21 | $26.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.4% | +84.1% | +93.9% | +77.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.7 | 60.1 | 57.3 | 52.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.0M | 8.2M | 2.0M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NWG and BCS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NWG as "Buy", BCS as "Buy", HSBC as "Hold", DB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 88.9% upside for BCS (target: $44) vs -52.7% for DB (target: $15). For income investors, NWG offers the higher dividend yield at 10.35% vs BCS's 3.53%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $44.00 | $52.00 | $14.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 24 | 19 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.3% | +3.5% | +3.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.17 | $0.61 | $3.30 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +11.4% | +10.4% | +4.1% | 0.0% |
NWG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HSBC leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
NWG vs BCS vs HSBC vs DB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NWG or BCS or HSBC or DB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NatWest Group plc (NWG) is the stronger pick with 3.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -53. 0% for Barclays PLC (BCS). NatWest Group plc (NWG) offers the better valuation at 4. 2x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NatWest Group plc (NWG) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NWG or BCS or HSBC or DB?
On trailing P/E, NatWest Group plc (NWG) is the cheapest at 4.
2x versus HSBC Holdings plc at 14. 7x. On forward P/E, Deutsche Bank AG is actually cheaper at 9. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Deutsche Bank AG wins at 0. 08x versus Barclays PLC's 0. 29x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NWG or BCS or HSBC or DB?
Over the past 5 years, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) delivered a total return of +225.
7%, compared to +135. 3% for Deutsche Bank AG (DB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HSBC returned +264. 7% versus DB's +101. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NWG or BCS or HSBC or DB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
12β versus Deutsche Bank AG's 1. 48β — meaning DB is approximately 32% more volatile than HSBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NatWest Group plc (NWG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 169% versus 3% for Deutsche Bank AG — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NWG or BCS or HSBC or DB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NatWest Group plc (NWG) is pulling ahead at 3.
2% versus -53. 0% for Barclays PLC (BCS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Deutsche Bank AG grew EPS 125. 5% year-over-year, compared to -2. 4% for HSBC Holdings plc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NWG or BCS or HSBC or DB?
Barclays PLC (BCS) is the more profitable company, earning 26.
7% net margin versus 11. 4% for Deutsche Bank AG — meaning it keeps 26. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCS leads at 37. 3% versus 16. 0% for DB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCS leads at 108. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NWG or BCS or HSBC or DB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 08x versus Barclays PLC's 0. 29x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for Barclays PLC — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCS: 88. 9% to $44. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NWG or BCS or HSBC or DB?
In this comparison, NWG (10.
3% yield), HSBC (3. 7% yield), BCS (3. 5% yield) pay a dividend. DB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NWG or BCS or HSBC or DB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
12), 3. 7% yield, +264. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSBC: +264. 7%, DB: +101. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NWG and BCS and HSBC and DB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
NWG, BCS, HSBC pay a dividend while DB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.