Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NWGL vs LPX vs WFG vs RYN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
REIT - Specialty
NWGL vs LPX vs WFG vs RYN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $15M | $5.28B | $4.78B | $3.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37M | $2.56B | $5.81B | $678M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $82M | $-1.46B | $386M |
| Gross Margin | 19.4% | 19.8% | 2.0% | 27.4% |
| Operating Margin | -16.6% | 5.4% | -12.8% | 5.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 29.9x | — | 54.1x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $401M | $457M | $1.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $967K | $292M | $277M | $843M |
NWGL vs LPX vs WFG vs RYN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CL Workshop Group L… (NWGL) | 100 | 9.1 | -90.9% |
| Louisiana-Pacific C… (LPX) | 100 | 136.7 | +36.7% |
| West Fraser Timber … (WFG) | 100 | 86.6 | -13.4% |
| Rayonier Inc. (RYN) | 100 | 71.7 | -28.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NWGL vs LPX vs WFG vs RYN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NWGL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LPX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 346.8% 10Y total return vs WFG's 117.5%
- Better valuation composite
WFG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 23.5%, EPS growth -222.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.7%
- 23.5% revenue growth vs RYN's -61.6%
- 2.1% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs RYN's 9.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
RYN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.40, yield 9.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 47.7%, current ratio 3.11x
- Beta 0.40, yield 9.0%, current ratio 3.11x
- 57.0% margin vs NWGL's -29.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.5% revenue growth vs RYN's -61.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 57.0% margin vs NWGL's -29.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs NWGL's 1.80, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs RYN's 9.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -2.5% vs NWGL's -35.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.9% ROA vs NWGL's -21.0%, ROIC 2.4% vs -10.7% |
NWGL vs LPX vs WFG vs RYN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NWGL vs LPX vs WFG vs RYN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LPX leads in 2 of 6 categories
RYN leads 1 • WFG leads 1 • NWGL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RYN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WFG is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 156.3x NWGL's $37M. RYN is the more profitable business, keeping 57.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NWGL's -29.5%. On growth, RYN holds the edge at +2.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37M | $2.6B | $5.8B | $678M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $246M | -$139M | $125M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $82M | -$1.5B | $386M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$994,081 | -$7M | -$632M | $191M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +19.8% | +2.0% | +27.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -16.6% | +5.4% | -12.8% | +5.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.5% | +3.2% | -25.2% | +57.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | -0.3% | -10.9% | +28.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.7% | -20.7% | -8.6% | +2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.7% | -70.0% | -5.6% | -124.2% |
Valuation Metrics
WFG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.3x trailing earnings, LPX trades at a 22% valuation discount to RYN's 46.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LPX's 13.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WFG's 69.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15M | $5.3B | $4.8B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20M | $5.4B | $4.9B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 36.32x | -5.18x | 46.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.89x | — | 54.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.33x | 69.52x | 17.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.02x | 1.95x | 0.85x | 6.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.05x | 0.85x | 1.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 57.98x | — | 15.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LPX leads this category, winning 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RYN delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-77 for NWGL. WFG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NWGL's 1.69x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -77.0% | +4.7% | -19.9% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.0% | +3.1% | -15.2% | +12.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.7% | +10.9% | -6.8% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -22.5% | +11.3% | -7.6% | +2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.69x | 0.23x | 0.06x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | $109M | $180M | $230M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $966,807 | $292M | $277M | $843M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $401M | $457M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.59x | 11.67x | -8.07x | 3.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LPX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LPX five years ago would be worth $11,049 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $940 for NWGL. Over the past 12 months, RYN leads with a -2.5% total return vs NWGL's -35.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LPX at 7.6% vs NWGL's -54.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -33.2% | -7.2% | +0.6% | -4.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.1% | -14.5% | -13.5% | -2.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.6% | +24.6% | -13.2% | -9.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.6% | +10.5% | -20.6% | -21.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.6% | +346.8% | +117.5% | +36.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -54.5% | +7.6% | -4.6% | -3.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WFG and RYN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RYN is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NWGL's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WFG currently trades 80.0% from its 52-week high vs NWGL's 13.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.80x | 1.20x | 0.66x | 0.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.61 | $102.86 | $78.55 | $27.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.61 | $66.68 | $57.34 | $19.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.6% | +73.4% | +80.0% | +74.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.7 | 47.6 | 45.7 | 52.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 75K | 1.0M | 173K | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WFG and RYN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LPX as "Buy", WFG as "Buy", RYN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 36.0% upside for RYN (target: $28) vs 28.4% for WFG (target: $81). For income investors, RYN offers the higher dividend yield at 9.02% vs LPX's 1.48%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $102.00 | $80.67 | $27.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | 4 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% | +2.1% | +9.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 10 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.11 | $1.79 | $1.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | +2.8% | +2.2% |
LPX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). RYN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
NWGL vs LPX vs WFG vs RYN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NWGL or LPX or WFG or RYN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, West Fraser Timber Co.
Ltd. (WFG) is the stronger pick with 23. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -61. 6% for Rayonier Inc. (RYN). Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) offers the better valuation at 36. 3x trailing P/E (29. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NWGL or LPX or WFG or RYN?
On trailing P/E, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) is the cheapest at 36.
3x versus Rayonier Inc. at 46. 4x. On forward P/E, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation is actually cheaper at 29. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NWGL or LPX or WFG or RYN?
Over the past 5 years, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) delivered a total return of +10.
5%, compared to -90. 6% for CL Workshop Group Limited (NWGL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LPX returned +346. 8% versus NWGL's -90. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NWGL or LPX or WFG or RYN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rayonier Inc.
(RYN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus CL Workshop Group Limited's 1. 80β — meaning NWGL is approximately 352% more volatile than RYN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 169% for CL Workshop Group Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NWGL or LPX or WFG or RYN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), West Fraser Timber Co.
Ltd. (WFG) is pulling ahead at 23. 5% versus -61. 6% for Rayonier Inc. (RYN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CL Workshop Group Limited grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -222. 8% for West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WFG leads at -7. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NWGL or LPX or WFG or RYN?
Rayonier Inc.
(RYN) is the more profitable company, earning 97. 9% net margin versus -40. 2% for CL Workshop Group Limited — meaning it keeps 97. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RYN leads at 17. 2% versus -19. 9% for NWGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RYN leads at 32. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NWGL or LPX or WFG or RYN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) trades at 29.
9x forward P/E versus 54. 1x for Rayonier Inc. — 24. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RYN: 36. 0% to $27. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — NWGL or LPX or WFG or RYN?
In this comparison, RYN (9.
0% yield), WFG (2. 1% yield), LPX (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. NWGL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NWGL or LPX or WFG or RYN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rayonier Inc.
(RYN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 40), 9. 0% yield). CL Workshop Group Limited (NWGL) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RYN: +36. 9%, NWGL: -90. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NWGL and LPX and WFG and RYN?
These companies operate in different sectors (NWGL (Basic Materials) and LPX (Basic Materials) and WFG (Basic Materials) and RYN (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NWGL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LPX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WFG is a small-cap high-growth stock; RYN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. LPX, WFG, RYN pay a dividend while NWGL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.