Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NWGL vs UFPI vs WY vs LPX vs PCH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
REIT - Specialty
Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
REIT - Specialty
NWGL vs UFPI vs WY vs LPX vs PCH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | REIT - Specialty | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $15M | $4.76B | $17.09B | $5.28B | $3.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37M | $6.19B | $6.92B | $2.56B | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $264M | $397M | $82M | $64M |
| Gross Margin | 19.4% | 16.6% | 13.4% | 19.8% | 15.7% |
| Operating Margin | -16.6% | 5.4% | 7.7% | 5.4% | 8.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.9x | 83.6x | 29.9x | 53.8x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $230M | $5.57B | $401M | $1.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $967K | $925M | $464M | $292M | $152M |
NWGL vs UFPI vs WY vs LPX vs PCH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CL Workshop Group L… (NWGL) | 100 | 9.1 | -90.9% |
| UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) | 100 | 81.9 | -18.1% |
| Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) | 100 | 77.3 | -22.7% |
| Louisiana-Pacific C… (LPX) | 100 | 136.7 | +36.7% |
| PotlatchDeltic Corp… (PCH) | 100 | 91.9 | -8.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NWGL vs UFPI vs WY vs LPX vs PCH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NWGL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
UFPI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 7.4%, current ratio 4.59x
- Lower P/E (15.9x vs 53.8x)
- 1.7% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs PCH's 4.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 6.5% ROA vs NWGL's -21.0%, ROIC 11.4% vs -10.7%
WY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.51 vs NWGL's 1.80, lower leverage
LPX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 346.8% 10Y total return vs UFPI's 230.6%
PCH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 4.3%
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth -63.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.4%
- Beta 0.75, yield 4.3%, current ratio 1.49x
- 3.7% FFO/revenue growth vs NWGL's -32.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.7% FFO/revenue growth vs NWGL's -32.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 53.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.8% margin vs NWGL's -29.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs NWGL's 1.80, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs PCH's 4.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.9% vs NWGL's -35.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs NWGL's -21.0%, ROIC 11.4% vs -10.7% |
NWGL vs UFPI vs WY vs LPX vs PCH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NWGL vs UFPI vs WY vs LPX vs PCH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UFPI leads in 2 of 6 categories
PCH leads 1 • LPX leads 1 • NWGL leads 0 • WY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PCH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WY is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 186.2x NWGL's $37M. PCH is the more profitable business, keeping 5.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NWGL's -29.5%. On growth, PCH holds the edge at +23.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37M | $6.2B | $6.9B | $2.6B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $498M | $1.0B | $246M | $195M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $264M | $397M | $82M | $64M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$994,081 | $298M | $516M | -$7M | $131M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +16.6% | +13.4% | +19.8% | +15.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -16.6% | +5.4% | +7.7% | +5.4% | +8.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.5% | +4.3% | +5.7% | +3.2% | +5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +4.8% | +7.5% | -0.3% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.7% | -8.4% | -2.0% | -20.7% | +23.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.7% | -31.5% | +100.0% | -70.0% | +6.9% |
Valuation Metrics
UFPI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.8x trailing earnings, UFPI trades at a 89% valuation discount to PCH's 149.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UFPI's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PCH's 140.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15M | $4.8B | $17.1B | $5.3B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20M | $4.1B | $22.2B | $5.4B | $4.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 16.77x | 52.67x | 36.32x | 149.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.92x | 83.63x | 29.89x | 53.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.67x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.70x | 22.79x | 13.33x | 140.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.02x | 0.75x | 2.47x | 1.95x | 3.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.60x | 1.81x | 3.05x | 1.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.24x | 194.19x | 57.98x | 47.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UFPI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UFPI delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-77 for NWGL. UFPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NWGL's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCH scores 6/9 vs WY's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -77.0% | +8.4% | +4.2% | +4.7% | +3.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.0% | +6.5% | +2.4% | +3.1% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.7% | +11.4% | +2.4% | +10.9% | +0.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -22.5% | +10.2% | +3.0% | +11.3% | +1.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.69x | 0.07x | 0.59x | 0.23x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | -$695M | $5.1B | $109M | $883M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $966,807 | $925M | $464M | $292M | $152M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $230M | $5.6B | $401M | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.59x | 43.92x | 1.95x | 11.67x | 1.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LPX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LPX five years ago would be worth $11,049 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $940 for NWGL. Over the past 12 months, PCH leads with a +13.9% total return vs NWGL's -35.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LPX at 7.6% vs NWGL's -54.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -33.2% | -8.6% | +0.5% | -7.2% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.1% | -12.0% | -5.0% | -14.5% | +13.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.6% | +6.3% | -11.7% | +24.6% | +1.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.6% | +1.5% | -23.7% | +10.5% | -13.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.6% | +230.6% | +16.5% | +346.8% | +93.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -54.5% | +2.1% | -4.1% | +7.6% | +0.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WY and PCH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WY is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NWGL's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PCH currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs NWGL's 13.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.80x | 0.92x | 0.51x | 1.20x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.61 | $118.00 | $27.86 | $102.86 | $45.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.61 | $80.06 | $21.16 | $66.68 | $37.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.6% | +71.1% | +85.1% | +73.4% | +91.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.7 | 35.6 | 45.5 | 47.6 | 46.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 75K | 379K | 5.0M | 1.0M | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — UFPI and PCH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UFPI as "Buy", WY as "Buy", LPX as "Buy", PCH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 35.0% upside for LPX (target: $102) vs 22.2% for PCH (target: $51). For income investors, PCH offers the higher dividend yield at 4.30% vs LPX's 1.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $103.00 | $29.83 | $102.00 | $51.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 25 | 23 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | +3.5% | +1.5% | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 13 | 0 | 8 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.40 | $0.84 | $1.11 | $1.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.1% | +0.9% | +1.2% | +1.1% |
UFPI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PCH leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
NWGL vs UFPI vs WY vs LPX vs PCH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NWGL or UFPI or WY or LPX or PCH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PotlatchDeltic Corporation (PCH) is the stronger pick with 3.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 3% for CL Workshop Group Limited (NWGL). UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NWGL or UFPI or WY or LPX or PCH?
On trailing P/E, UFP Industries, Inc.
(UFPI) is the cheapest at 16. 8x versus PotlatchDeltic Corporation at 149. 0x. On forward P/E, UFP Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NWGL or UFPI or WY or LPX or PCH?
Over the past 5 years, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) delivered a total return of +10.
5%, compared to -90. 6% for CL Workshop Group Limited (NWGL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LPX returned +346. 8% versus NWGL's -90. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NWGL or UFPI or WY or LPX or PCH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus CL Workshop Group Limited's 1. 80β — meaning NWGL is approximately 251% more volatile than WY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 169% for CL Workshop Group Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NWGL or UFPI or WY or LPX or PCH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PotlatchDeltic Corporation (PCH) is pulling ahead at 3.
7% versus -32. 3% for CL Workshop Group Limited (NWGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CL Workshop Group Limited grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -64. 7% for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PCH leads at -7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NWGL or UFPI or WY or LPX or PCH?
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
4% net margin versus -40. 2% for CL Workshop Group Limited — meaning it keeps 5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LPX leads at 9. 6% versus -19. 9% for NWGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LPX leads at 21. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NWGL or UFPI or WY or LPX or PCH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, UFP Industries, Inc.
(UFPI) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 83. 6x for Weyerhaeuser Company — 67. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LPX: 35. 0% to $102. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NWGL or UFPI or WY or LPX or PCH?
In this comparison, PCH (4.
3% yield), WY (3. 5% yield), UFPI (1. 7% yield), LPX (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. NWGL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NWGL or UFPI or WY or LPX or PCH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 3. 5% yield). CL Workshop Group Limited (NWGL) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WY: +16. 5%, NWGL: -90. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NWGL and UFPI and WY and LPX and PCH?
These companies operate in different sectors (NWGL (Basic Materials) and UFPI (Basic Materials) and WY (Real Estate) and LPX (Basic Materials) and PCH (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NWGL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UFPI is a small-cap deep-value stock; WY is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; LPX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PCH is a small-cap income-oriented stock. UFPI, WY, LPX, PCH pay a dividend while NWGL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.