Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NXDR vs BMBL vs PINS vs MTCH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
NXDR vs BMBL vs PINS vs MTCH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $744M | $403M | $14.34B | $8.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $265M | $931M | $4.37B | $3.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $-661M | $334M | $663M |
| Gross Margin | 83.9% | 71.8% | 79.9% | 73.8% |
| Operating Margin | -22.7% | -15.6% | 6.3% | 26.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 3.5x | 11.8x | 13.5x |
| Total Debt | $56M | $588M | $262M | $3.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $63M | $176M | $969M | $1.03B |
NXDR vs BMBL vs PINS vs MTCH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nextdoor Holdings, … (NXDR) | 100 | 19.0 | -81.0% |
| Bumble Inc. (BMBL) | 100 | 5.5 | -94.5% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | 100 | 29.1 | -70.9% |
| Match Group, Inc. (MTCH) | 100 | 26.1 | -73.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NXDR vs BMBL vs PINS vs MTCH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NXDR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.2%, EPS growth 44.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.6%
- +27.2% vs BMBL's -21.2%
BMBL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.43
- Lower P/E (3.5x vs 13.5x)
PINS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 5.5%, current ratio 7.64x
- Beta 1.27, current ratio 7.64x
- 15.8% revenue growth vs BMBL's -9.9%
MTCH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 195.5% 10Y total return vs PINS's -11.6%
- 18.8% margin vs BMBL's -71.0%
- Beta 1.04 vs NXDR's 1.48
- 2.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.8% revenue growth vs BMBL's -9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.5x vs 13.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.8% margin vs BMBL's -71.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs NXDR's 1.48 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.2% vs BMBL's -21.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.3% ROA vs BMBL's -36.5%, ROIC 23.7% vs 13.4% |
NXDR vs BMBL vs PINS vs MTCH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NXDR vs BMBL vs PINS vs MTCH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MTCH leads in 2 of 6 categories
BMBL leads 1 • NXDR leads 0 • PINS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BMBL and MTCH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PINS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 16.5x NXDR's $265M. MTCH is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BMBL's -71.0%. On growth, PINS holds the edge at +17.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $265M | $931M | $4.4B | $3.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$61M | -$125M | $294M | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | -$661M | $334M | $663M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $272M | $1.2B | $1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.9% | +71.8% | +79.9% | +73.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.7% | -15.6% | +6.3% | +26.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.5% | -71.0% | +7.6% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +29.2% | +27.6% | +29.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.8% | -14.1% | +17.8% | +3.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.5% | +2.3% | -10.3% | +45.5% |
Valuation Metrics
BMBL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, MTCH trades at a 57% valuation discount to PINS's 35.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BMBL's 2.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PINS's 39.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $744M | $403M | $14.3B | $8.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $737M | $816M | $13.6B | $11.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.71x | -0.52x | 35.37x | 15.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 3.55x | 11.84x | 13.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.91x | 39.51x | 11.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | 0.42x | 3.40x | 2.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.72x | 0.54x | 3.13x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 126.36x | 1.69x | 11.46x | 8.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PINS and MTCH each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PINS delivers a 7.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-77 for BMBL. PINS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BMBL's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MTCH scores 7/9 vs BMBL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.3% | -76.8% | +7.8% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.1% | -36.5% | +6.3% | +15.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.4% | +13.4% | +6.1% | +23.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.3% | +13.9% | +6.4% | +23.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.88x | 0.06x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $413M | -$707M | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63M | $176M | $969M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $56M | $588M | $262M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -35.17x | 23.20x | 6.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTCH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PINS five years ago would be worth $3,604 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $597 for BMBL. Over the past 12 months, NXDR leads with a +27.2% total return vs BMBL's -21.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTCH at 4.4% vs BMBL's -41.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.7% | -4.4% | -18.8% | +14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.2% | -21.2% | -21.1% | +20.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.3% | -80.0% | -0.1% | +13.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.1% | -94.0% | -64.0% | -74.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | -95.1% | -11.6% | +195.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.2% | -41.6% | -0.0% | +4.4% |
Risk & Volatility
MTCH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTCH is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NXDR's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTCH currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs BMBL's 40.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.43x | 1.27x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.72 | $8.64 | $39.93 | $39.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.32 | $2.61 | $13.84 | $26.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.6% | +40.0% | +54.0% | +91.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.1 | 35.9 | 60.2 | 68.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 4.2M | 16.1M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXDR as "Hold", BMBL as "Hold", PINS as "Buy", MTCH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 69.3% upside for NXDR (target: $3) vs 0.5% for MTCH (target: $36). MTCH is the only dividend payer here at 1.98% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.25 | $4.25 | $25.36 | $36.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 23 | 47 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +7.1% | +6.5% | +9.5% |
MTCH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). BMBL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NXDR vs BMBL vs PINS vs MTCH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NXDR or BMBL or PINS or MTCH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) is the stronger pick with 15. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Bumble Inc. (BMBL). Match Group, Inc. (MTCH) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) a "Buy" — based on 47 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NXDR or BMBL or PINS or MTCH?
On trailing P/E, Match Group, Inc.
(MTCH) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus Pinterest, Inc. at 35. 4x. On forward P/E, Bumble Inc. is actually cheaper at 3. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NXDR or BMBL or PINS or MTCH?
Over the past 5 years, Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) delivered a total return of -64. 0%, compared to -94. 0% for Bumble Inc. (BMBL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTCH returned +195. 5% versus BMBL's -95. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NXDR or BMBL or PINS or MTCH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Match Group, Inc.
(MTCH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning NXDR is approximately 41% more volatile than MTCH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 88% for Bumble Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NXDR or BMBL or PINS or MTCH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) is pulling ahead at 15. 8% versus -9. 9% for Bumble Inc. (BMBL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 44. 0% year-over-year, compared to -77. 2% for Pinterest, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PINS leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NXDR or BMBL or PINS or MTCH?
Match Group, Inc.
(MTCH) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 6% net margin versus -72. 7% for Bumble Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BMBL leads at 26. 3% versus -27. 9% for NXDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXDR leads at 84. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NXDR or BMBL or PINS or MTCH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bumble Inc.
(BMBL) trades at 3. 5x forward P/E versus 13. 5x for Match Group, Inc. — 9. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NXDR: 69. 3% to $3. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — NXDR or BMBL or PINS or MTCH?
In this comparison, MTCH (2.
0% yield) pays a dividend. NXDR, BMBL, PINS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NXDR or BMBL or PINS or MTCH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Match Group, Inc.
(MTCH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), 2. 0% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTCH: +195. 5%, NXDR: -80. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NXDR and BMBL and PINS and MTCH?
These companies operate in different sectors (NXDR (Communication Services) and BMBL (Technology) and PINS (Communication Services) and MTCH (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NXDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BMBL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PINS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MTCH is a small-cap deep-value stock. MTCH pays a dividend while NXDR, BMBL, PINS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 6%
- Gross Margin > 50%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 11%
- Dividend Yield > 0.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.