Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NXGL vs LIQT vs POWI vs CDZI vs MSEX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Semiconductors
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
NXGL vs LIQT vs POWI vs CDZI vs MSEX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Semiconductors | Regulated Water | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $5M | $22M | $4.08B | $358M | $958M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $17M | $446M | $16M | $199M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-9M | $17M | $-33M | $44M |
| Gross Margin | 38.3% | 4.9% | 53.9% | 32.5% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | -25.5% | -50.0% | 4.6% | -155.4% | 28.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 58.7x | — | 20.5x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $12M | $0.00 | $86M | $419M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | — | $59M | $17M | $3M |
NXGL vs LIQT vs POWI vs CDZI vs MSEX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEXGEL, Inc. (NXGL) | 100 | 22.7 | -77.3% |
| LiqTech Internation… (LIQT) | 100 | 5.0 | -95.0% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 78.9 | -21.1% |
| Cadiz Inc. (CDZI) | 100 | 123.1 | +23.1% |
| Middlesex Water Com… (MSEX) | 100 | 42.9 | -57.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NXGL vs LIQT vs POWI vs CDZI vs MSEX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NXGL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 46.5%, current ratio 2.07x
LIQT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.
- Beta 0.54 vs POWI's 2.11
- +61.0% vs NXGL's -77.3%
POWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs MSEX's 63.3%
CDZI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 382.6%, EPS growth 5.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 157.3%
- Beta 1.56, yield 1.6%, current ratio 1.79x
- 382.6% revenue growth vs MSEX's 1.5%
MSEX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta -0.08, yield 2.7%
- Better valuation composite
- 22.1% margin vs CDZI's -206.6%
- 2.7% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs POWI's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 382.6% revenue growth vs MSEX's 1.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs CDZI's -206.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs POWI's 2.11 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs POWI's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.0% vs NXGL's -77.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 4.7% vs -31.1% |
NXGL vs LIQT vs POWI vs CDZI vs MSEX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NXGL vs LIQT vs POWI vs CDZI vs MSEX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSEX leads in 2 of 6 categories
POWI leads 1 • NXGL leads 0 • LIQT leads 0 • CDZI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LIQT and POWI and MSEX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
POWI is the larger business by revenue, generating $446M annually — 38.3x NXGL's $12M. MSEX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CDZI's -2.1%. On growth, LIQT holds the edge at +53.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $17M | $446M | $16M | $199M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$6M | $41M | -$23M | $81M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | -$9M | $17M | -$33M | $44M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$7M | $85M | -$30M | -$19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.3% | +4.9% | +53.9% | +32.5% | +33.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -25.5% | -50.0% | +4.6% | -155.4% | +28.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.7% | -53.3% | +3.7% | -2.1% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -21.8% | -39.3% | +18.9% | -188.6% | -9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.2% | +53.6% | +2.6% | +28.7% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.3% | +69.4% | -60.0% | +16.7% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NXGL and MSEX each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.8x trailing earnings, MSEX trades at a 88% valuation discount to POWI's 187.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MSEX's 15.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than POWI's 81.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $22M | $4.1B | $358M | $958M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $34M | $4.0B | $427M | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.19x | -2.55x | 187.90x | -8.96x | 21.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 58.74x | — | 20.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 13.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 81.32x | — | 15.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.56x | 1.32x | 9.20x | 37.25x | 4.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.64x | 2.10x | 6.13x | 9.63x | 1.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 46.85x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSEX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSEX delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-119 for CDZI. NXGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CDZI's 2.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), POWI scores 6/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -51.7% | -70.0% | +2.4% | -119.0% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.9% | -29.5% | +2.1% | -25.8% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -43.1% | -31.1% | +2.4% | -17.5% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -44.7% | — | +2.9% | -21.0% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 1.17x | — | 2.53x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $12M | -$59M | $69M | $416M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | — | $59M | $17M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $12M | $0 | $86M | $419M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -40.04x | -13.46x | — | -2.90x | 4.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
POWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in POWI five years ago would be worth $9,871 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $392 for LIQT. Over the past 12 months, LIQT leads with a +61.0% total return vs NXGL's -77.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDZI at 0.6% vs NXGL's -26.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -67.2% | +52.3% | +97.0% | -18.1% | +3.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -77.3% | +61.0% | +43.3% | +57.8% | -11.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.9% | -32.4% | -4.5% | +1.7% | -25.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.1% | -96.1% | -1.3% | -60.4% | -28.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.1% | -91.0% | +239.0% | -27.6% | +63.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.3% | -12.3% | -1.5% | +0.6% | -9.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — POWI and MSEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSEX is the less volatile stock with a -0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than POWI's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. POWI currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs NXGL's 20.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | 0.54x | 2.11x | 1.56x | -0.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.97 | $3.35 | $81.59 | $6.96 | $62.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.56 | $1.30 | $30.86 | $2.58 | $44.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.0% | +67.8% | +89.8% | +68.2% | +82.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.1 | 61.7 | 61.3 | 52.2 | 45.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 371K | 50K | 982K | 644K | 158K |
Analyst Outlook
MSEX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: POWI as "Buy", CDZI as "Buy", MSEX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.5% upside for CDZI (target: $10) vs 3.8% for MSEX (target: $54). For income investors, MSEX offers the higher dividend yield at 2.66% vs POWI's 1.14%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $79.00 | $10.00 | $53.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 16 | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.1% | +1.6% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 18 | 0 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.84 | $0.07 | $1.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MSEX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). POWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
NXGL vs LIQT vs POWI vs CDZI vs MSEX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NXGL or LIQT or POWI or CDZI or MSEX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cadiz Inc.
(CDZI) is the stronger pick with 382. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX). Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) offers the better valuation at 21. 8x trailing P/E (20. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NXGL or LIQT or POWI or CDZI or MSEX?
On trailing P/E, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the cheapest at 21.
8x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 187. 9x. On forward P/E, Middlesex Water Company is actually cheaper at 20. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NXGL or LIQT or POWI or CDZI or MSEX?
Over the past 5 years, Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) delivered a total return of -1. 3%, compared to -96. 1% for LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: POWI returned +239. 0% versus LIQT's -91. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NXGL or LIQT or POWI or CDZI or MSEX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
08β versus Power Integrations, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning POWI is approximately -2863% more volatile than MSEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NEXGEL, Inc. (NXGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 3% for Cadiz Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NXGL or LIQT or POWI or CDZI or MSEX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cadiz Inc.
(CDZI) is pulling ahead at 382. 6% versus 1. 5% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LiqTech International, Inc. grew EPS 45. 7% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Power Integrations, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDZI leads at 157. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NXGL or LIQT or POWI or CDZI or MSEX?
Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus -324. 1% for Cadiz Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSEX leads at 27. 9% versus -242. 0% for CDZI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — POWI leads at 54. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NXGL or LIQT or POWI or CDZI or MSEX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) trades at 20.
5x forward P/E versus 58. 7x for Power Integrations, Inc. — 38. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDZI: 110. 5% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NXGL or LIQT or POWI or CDZI or MSEX?
In this comparison, MSEX (2.
7% yield), CDZI (1. 6% yield), POWI (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. NXGL, LIQT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NXGL or LIQT or POWI or CDZI or MSEX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
08), 2. 7% yield). Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSEX: +63. 3%, POWI: +239. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NXGL and LIQT and POWI and CDZI and MSEX?
These companies operate in different sectors (NXGL (Healthcare) and LIQT (Industrials) and POWI (Technology) and CDZI (Utilities) and MSEX (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NXGL is a small-cap high-growth stock; LIQT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDZI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MSEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. POWI, CDZI, MSEX pay a dividend while NXGL, LIQT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.