Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OABI vs ADCT vs RCUS vs HALO vs ALNY

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OABI
OmniAb, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$167M
5Y Perf.-84.9%
ADCT
ADC Therapeutics S.A.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • CH
Market Cap$478M
5Y Perf.-86.2%
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.50B
5Y Perf.-28.9%
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.68B
5Y Perf.+60.3%
ALNY
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$39.48B
5Y Perf.+56.7%

OABI vs ADCT vs RCUS vs HALO vs ALNY — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OABI logoOABI
ADCT logoADCT
RCUS logoRCUS
HALO logoHALO
ALNY logoALNY
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$167M$478M$2.50B$7.68B$39.48B
Revenue (TTM)$29M$79M$236M$1.40B$4.29B
Net Income (TTM)$-54M$-137M$-369M$317M$577M
Gross Margin82.8%90.7%90.7%81.9%80.9%
Operating Margin-173.0%-149.6%-168.6%58.4%17.5%
Forward P/E8.1x44.2x
Total Debt$20M$439M$99M$0.00$1.28B
Cash & Equiv.$26M$261M$222M$134M$1.66B

OABI vs ADCT vs RCUS vs HALO vs ALNYLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OABI
ADCT
RCUS
HALO
ALNY
StockSep 21May 26Return
OmniAb, Inc. (OABI)10015.1-84.9%
ADC Therapeutics S.… (ADCT)10013.8-86.2%
Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS)10071.1-28.9%
Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO)100160.3+60.3%
Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY)100156.7+56.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OABI vs ADCT vs RCUS vs HALO vs ALNY

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HALO leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Arcus Biosciences, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. ALNY also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OABI
OmniAb, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

OABI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ADCT
ADC Therapeutics S.A.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, ADCT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

RCUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +209.6% vs HALO's -7.1%
Best for: momentum
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

HALO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 0.56
  • 5.7% 10Y total return vs ALNY's 411.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 4.66x
  • Beta 0.56, current ratio 4.66x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
ALNY
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Play

ALNY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
  • 65.2% revenue growth vs OABI's -29.3%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthALNY logoALNY65.2% revenue growth vs OABI's -29.3%
ValueHALO logoHALOLower P/E (8.1x vs 44.2x)
Quality / MarginsHALO logoHALO22.7% margin vs OABI's -187.6%
Stability / SafetyHALO logoHALOBeta 0.56 vs RCUS's 1.95
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RCUS logoRCUS+209.6% vs HALO's -7.1%
Efficiency (ROA)HALO logoHALO12.5% ROA vs ADCT's -44.7%

OABI vs ADCT vs RCUS vs HALO vs ALNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OABIOmniAb, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
89.2%$7M
Royalty
10.8%$878,000
ADCTADC Therapeutics S.A.
FY 2025
Product
90.4%$74M
License Revenues
6.1%$5M
Royalty Revenue
3.4%$3M
RCUSArcus Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
License And Development Services
87.4%$221M
Development Services
6.7%$17M
R&D Services
3.2%$8M
License
2.8%$7M
HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Royalty
53.6%$868M
Product
23.3%$376M
Collaborative Agreements
9.4%$152M
Bulk rHuPH20
8.2%$133M
Sales-based milestone
4.3%$70M
Upfront Fees
1.1%$18M
ALNYAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
GIVLAARI
64.1%$308M
ONPATTRO
35.9%$173M

OABI vs ADCT vs RCUS vs HALO vs ALNY — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHALOLAGGINGALNY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ALNY is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 148.1x OABI's $29M. HALO is the more profitable business, keeping 22.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OABI's -187.6%. On growth, OABI holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOABI logoOABIOmniAb, Inc.ADCT logoADCTADC Therapeutics …RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…ALNY logoALNYAlnylam Pharmaceu…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$29M$79M$236M$1.4B$4.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$33M-$117M-$391M$945M$677M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$54M-$137M-$369M$317M$577M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$26M-$115M-$489M$645M$641M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+82.8%+90.7%+90.7%+81.9%+80.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-173.0%-149.6%-168.6%+58.4%+17.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-187.6%-173.0%-156.4%+22.7%+13.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-89.9%-144.7%-2.1%+46.2%+15.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.5%-9.5%-39.3%+51.6%+96.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+64.7%+41.7%+10.5%-2.1%+4.4%
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HALO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 25.5x trailing earnings, HALO trades at a 80% valuation discount to ALNY's 127.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HALO's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALNY's 70.2x.

MetricOABI logoOABIOmniAb, Inc.ADCT logoADCTADC Therapeutics …RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…ALNY logoALNYAlnylam Pharmaceu…
Market CapShares × price$167M$478M$2.5B$7.7B$39.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$162M$656M$2.4B$7.5B$39.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.58x-3.36x-7.54x25.46x127.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.09x44.18x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.11x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.34x70.17x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.96x5.88x10.11x5.50x10.63x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.63x4.22x165.47x50.50x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.91x84.84x
HALO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HALO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

HALO delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. OABI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALNY's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricOABI logoOABIOmniAb, Inc.ADCT logoADCTADC Therapeutics …RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…ALNY logoALNYAlnylam Pharmaceu…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-20.3%-69.0%+6.5%+98.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-18.1%-44.7%-35.3%+12.5%+11.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-19.7%-64.1%+73.4%+33.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-24.0%-43.8%-42.1%+38.2%+15.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–924056
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.08x0.16x1.62x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M$178M-$123M-$134M-$379M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$26M$261M$222M$134M$1.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$20M$439M$99M$0$1.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.72x-13.38x46.08x2.02x
HALO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ALNY five years ago would be worth $22,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,506 for OABI. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs HALO's -7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HALO at 29.1% vs OABI's -24.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOABI logoOABIOmniAb, Inc.ADCT logoADCTADC Therapeutics …RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…ALNY logoALNYAlnylam Pharmaceu…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-21.8%+6.8%+6.5%-7.3%-26.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-3.9%+196.1%+209.6%-7.1%+7.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-57.4%+77.4%+24.9%+115.3%+40.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.9%-84.1%-18.6%+37.0%+125.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.9%-87.3%+45.9%+570.7%+411.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-24.8%+21.0%+7.7%+29.1%+12.1%
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — RCUS and HALO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HALO is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCUS currently trades 86.3% from its 52-week high vs ALNY's 59.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOABI logoOABIOmniAb, Inc.ADCT logoADCTADC Therapeutics …RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…ALNY logoALNYAlnylam Pharmaceu…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.51x1.89x1.95x0.56x0.71x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.30$4.97$28.72$82.22$495.55
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.22$1.23$7.06$47.50$245.96
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+63.9%+75.7%+86.3%+79.3%+59.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.548.060.552.443.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded428K946K1.2M1.4M1.1M
Evenly matched — RCUS and HALO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: OABI as "Buy", ADCT as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", HALO as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 172.1% upside for OABI (target: $4) vs 20.2% for HALO (target: $78).

MetricOABI logoOABIOmniAb, Inc.ADCT logoADCTADC Therapeutics …RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…ALNY logoALNYAlnylam Pharmaceu…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.00$7.50$30.00$78.33$445.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts912182752
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+4.5%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

HALO leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OABI vs ADCT vs RCUS vs HALO vs ALNY: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OABI or ADCT or RCUS or HALO or ALNY a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ALNY) is the stronger pick with 65. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 3% for OmniAb, Inc. (OABI). Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OmniAb, Inc. (OABI) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OABI or ADCT or RCUS or HALO or ALNY?

On trailing P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the cheapest at 25. 5x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 127. 0x. On forward P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OABI or ADCT or RCUS or HALO or ALNY?

Over the past 5 years, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ALNY) delivered a total return of +125. 4%, compared to -84. 9% for OmniAb, Inc. (OABI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HALO returned +570. 7% versus ADCT's -87. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OABI or ADCT or RCUS or HALO or ALNY?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning RCUS is approximately 250% more volatile than HALO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OmniAb, Inc. (OABI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 162% for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OABI or ADCT or RCUS or HALO or ALNY?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ALNY) is pulling ahead at 65. 2% versus -29. 3% for OmniAb, Inc. (OABI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -25. 4% for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OABI or ADCT or RCUS or HALO or ALNY?

Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus -347. 0% for OmniAb, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus -383. 1% for OABI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OABI or ADCT or RCUS or HALO or ALNY more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 44. 2x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 36. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OABI: 172. 1% to $4. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OABI or ADCT or RCUS or HALO or ALNY?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is OABI or ADCT or RCUS or HALO or ALNY better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +570. 7% 10Y return). ADC Therapeutics S. A. (ADCT) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HALO: +570. 7%, ADCT: -87. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OABI and ADCT and RCUS and HALO and ALNY?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OABI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OABI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 123%
  • Gross Margin > 49%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ADCT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCUS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HALO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 25%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALNY

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 48%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform OABI and ADCT and RCUS and HALO and ALNY on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(OABI: 247.3% · ADCT: -9.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.