Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OACC vs RLAY vs BCTX vs RXRX vs NUVL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
OACC vs RLAY vs BCTX vs RXRX vs NUVL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $261M | $2.37B | $5M | $1.46B | $7.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $11M | $0.00 | $66M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $-273M | $-38M | $-560M | $-450M |
| Gross Margin | — | 66.3% | — | -34.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -27.8% | — | -8.8% | — |
| Forward P/E | 195.8x | — | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $12K | $32M | $0.00 | $78M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $84M | $14M | $743M | $262M |
OACC vs RLAY vs BCTX vs RXRX vs NUVL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oaktree Acquisition… (OACC) | 100 | 106.5 | +6.5% |
| Relay Therapeutics,… (RLAY) | 100 | 303.6 | +203.6% |
| BriaCell Therapeuti… (BCTX) | 100 | 4.8 | -95.2% |
| Recursion Pharmaceu… (RXRX) | 100 | 48.4 | -51.6% |
| Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) | 100 | 130.8 | +30.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OACC vs RLAY vs BCTX vs RXRX vs NUVL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OACC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.08
- Lower volatility, beta 0.08, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 2.14x
- Beta 0.08 vs RXRX's 3.18, lower leverage
- 2.6% ROA vs BCTX's -153.6%
RLAY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 53.4%, EPS growth 31.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 123.2%
- 53.4% revenue growth vs BCTX's -136.6%
- +324.1% vs BCTX's -87.5%
BCTX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, RXRX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NUVL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 446.1% 10Y total return vs OACC's 6.1%
- Beta 1.09, current ratio 15.27x
- 3.2% margin vs RLAY's -25.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.4% revenue growth vs BCTX's -136.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs RLAY's -25.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.08 vs RXRX's 3.18, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +324.1% vs BCTX's -87.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs BCTX's -153.6% |
OACC vs RLAY vs BCTX vs RXRX vs NUVL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
OACC vs RLAY vs BCTX vs RXRX vs NUVL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OACC leads in 2 of 6 categories
RXRX leads 1 • NUVL leads 1 • RLAY leads 0 • BCTX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RXRX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RXRX and NUVL operate at a comparable scale, with $66M and $0 in trailing revenue. RXRX is the more profitable business, keeping -8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RLAY's -25.5%. On growth, RXRX holds the edge at -56.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $11M | $0 | $66M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$847,195 | -$298M | -$43M | -$521M | -$346M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | -$273M | -$38M | -$560M | -$450M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$278,200 | -$213M | -$37M | -$326M | -$313M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +66.3% | — | -34.4% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -27.8% | — | -8.8% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -25.5% | — | -8.4% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -20.0% | — | -4.9% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -60.9% | — | -56.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.9% | +92.3% | +56.0% | -17.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BCTX and RXRX and NUVL each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $261M | $2.4B | $5M | $1.5B | $7.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $259M | $2.3B | -$9M | $797M | $7.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 195.76x | -7.77x | -0.05x | -2.27x | -17.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9999.00x | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 154.15x | — | 19.58x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.39x | 3.79x | 0.32x | 1.29x | 5.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OACC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OACC delivers a 0.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-194 for BCTX. OACC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RXRX's 0.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RLAY scores 5/9 vs NUVL's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.0% | -43.9% | -193.8% | -54.3% | -42.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | -40.1% | -153.6% | -40.6% | -37.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -37.3% | -12.6% | -95.8% | -32.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.0% | -42.7% | -3.4% | -50.1% | -34.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.06x | — | 0.07x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$52M | -$14M | -$665M | -$262M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $84M | $14M | $743M | $262M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11,824 | $32M | $0 | $78M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -796.67x | -336.46x | -26.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUVL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $54,613 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $83 for BCTX. Over the past 12 months, RLAY leads with a +324.1% total return vs BCTX's -87.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUVL at 39.5% vs BCTX's -84.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.0% | +52.9% | -42.8% | -22.1% | +1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.4% | +324.1% | -87.5% | -22.0% | +53.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.1% | +15.6% | -99.6% | -41.6% | +171.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.1% | -57.6% | -99.2% | -88.2% | +446.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.1% | -64.3% | — | -81.8% | +446.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.0% | +5.0% | -84.4% | -16.4% | +39.5% |
Risk & Volatility
OACC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OACC is the less volatile stock with a 0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RXRX's 3.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OACC currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs BCTX's 11.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.08x | 1.77x | 1.56x | 3.18x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.74 | $17.31 | $37.20 | $7.18 | $113.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.30 | $2.67 | $3.60 | $2.80 | $63.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.8% | +72.3% | +11.0% | +45.5% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.6 | 45.9 | 50.0 | 49.5 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 38K | 3.1M | 185K | 12.5M | 544K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RLAY as "Buy", RXRX as "Hold", NUVL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 236.4% upside for RXRX (target: $11) vs 41.0% for NUVL (target: $144).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $21.60 | — | $11.00 | $144.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | — | 10 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OACC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). RXRX leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
OACC vs RLAY vs BCTX vs RXRX vs NUVL: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OACC or RLAY or BCTX or RXRX or NUVL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Relay Therapeutics, Inc.
(RLAY) is the stronger pick with 53. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 26. 9% for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX). Oaktree Acquisition Corp. III Life Sciences (OACC) offers the better valuation at 195. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Relay Therapeutics, Inc. (RLAY) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OACC or RLAY or BCTX or RXRX or NUVL?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) delivered a total return of +446. 1%, compared to -99. 2% for BriaCell Therapeutics Corp. (BCTX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVL returned +446. 1% versus RXRX's -81. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OACC or RLAY or BCTX or RXRX or NUVL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Oaktree Acquisition Corp.
III Life Sciences (OACC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 08β versus Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 3. 18β — meaning RXRX is approximately 3817% more volatile than OACC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oaktree Acquisition Corp. III Life Sciences (OACC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 7% for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OACC or RLAY or BCTX or RXRX or NUVL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Relay Therapeutics, Inc.
(RLAY) is pulling ahead at 53. 4% versus 26. 9% for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Relay Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 31. 8% year-over-year, compared to -48. 9% for Nuvalent, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RLAY leads at 123. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OACC or RLAY or BCTX or RXRX or NUVL?
Oaktree Acquisition Corp.
III Life Sciences (OACC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -1800. 6% for Relay Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OACC leads at 0. 0% versus -1971. 6% for RLAY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RLAY leads at 76. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OACC or RLAY or BCTX or RXRX or NUVL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is OACC or RLAY or BCTX or RXRX or NUVL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Oaktree Acquisition Corp.
III Life Sciences (OACC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 08)). Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX) carries a higher beta of 3. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OACC: +6. 1%, RXRX: -81. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OACC and RLAY and BCTX and RXRX and NUVL?
These companies operate in different sectors (OACC (Financial Services) and RLAY (Healthcare) and BCTX (Healthcare) and RXRX (Healthcare) and NUVL (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OACC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RLAY is a small-cap high-growth stock; BCTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RXRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; NUVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.