Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OBIO vs NVCR vs XTNT vs BSX vs MDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
OBIO vs NVCR vs XTNT vs BSX vs MDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $222M | $1.92B | $80M | $84.08B | $99.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $33M | $674M | $133M | $20.07B | $35.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-53M | $-173M | $2M | $2.89B | $4.61B |
| Gross Margin | 99.4% | 75.2% | 62.0% | 69.0% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -154.7% | -27.2% | 4.8% | 19.8% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 16.7x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $290M | $35M | $12.42B | $28.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $103M | $6M | $2.04B | $2.22B |
OBIO vs NVCR vs XTNT vs BSX vs MDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orchestra BioMed Ho… (OBIO) | 100 | 35.1 | -64.9% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 20.3 | -79.7% |
| Xtant Medical Holdi… (XTNT) | 100 | 59.7 | -40.3% |
| Boston Scientific C… (BSX) | 100 | 137.9 | +37.9% |
| Medtronic plc (MDT) | 100 | 72.5 | -27.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OBIO vs NVCR vs XTNT vs BSX vs MDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OBIO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth 33.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 111.6%
- 11.7% revenue growth vs MDT's 3.6%
- +59.8% vs BSX's -46.0%
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, XTNT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BSX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 155.5% 10Y total return vs MDT's 26.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 50.7%, current ratio 1.62x
- Beta 0.34, current ratio 1.62x
- 14.4% margin vs OBIO's -158.2%
MDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 3.6%
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 16.7x)
- 3.6% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 175.8% ROA vs OBIO's -65.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs -162.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.7% revenue growth vs MDT's 3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 16.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.4% margin vs OBIO's -158.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs OBIO's 2.21 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +59.8% vs BSX's -46.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 175.8% ROA vs OBIO's -65.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs -162.6% |
OBIO vs NVCR vs XTNT vs BSX vs MDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OBIO vs NVCR vs XTNT vs BSX vs MDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MDT leads in 2 of 6 categories
BSX leads 2 • OBIO leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • XTNT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — OBIO and BSX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.5B annually — 1059.8x OBIO's $33M. BSX is the more profitable business, keeping 14.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OBIO's -158.2%. On growth, OBIO holds the edge at +121.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $33M | $674M | $133M | $20.1B | $35.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$52M | -$165M | $11M | $4.7B | $9.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$53M | -$173M | $2M | $2.9B | $4.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$49M | -$48M | $5M | $3.6B | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.4% | +75.2% | +62.0% | +69.0% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -154.7% | -27.2% | +4.8% | +19.8% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -158.2% | -25.7% | +1.3% | +14.4% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -147.7% | -7.1% | +3.9% | +18.1% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +121.2% | +12.3% | +19.0% | +15.9% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +166.7% | -100.0% | +123.7% | +18.5% | -11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MDT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.6x trailing earnings, MDT trades at a 26% valuation discount to BSX's 29.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MDT's 14.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BSX's 25.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $222M | $1.9B | $80M | $84.1B | $99.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $189M | $2.1B | $109M | $94.5B | $126.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.54x | -13.80x | -4.75x | 29.16x | 21.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 16.75x | 14.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 36.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 25.30x | 14.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.63x | 2.92x | 0.68x | 4.19x | 2.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2817.20x | 5.51x | 1.77x | 3.46x | 2.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 22.99x | 19.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BSX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSX delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-185 for OBIO. OBIO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BSX scores 7/9 vs XTNT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -185.1% | -50.8% | +3.8% | +12.4% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -65.9% | -16.5% | +1.8% | +6.9% | +175.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -162.6% | -16.4% | -12.8% | +8.8% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -65.5% | -28.9% | -17.9% | +11.1% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.85x | 0.82x | 0.51x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$33M | $187M | $29M | $10.4B | $26.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $103M | $6M | $2.0B | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $290M | $35M | $12.4B | $28.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -96.80x | 1.55x | 11.03x | 9.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BSX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSX five years ago would be worth $13,117 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, OBIO leads with a +59.8% total return vs BSX's -46.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BSX at 2.1% vs OBIO's -40.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.8% | +28.3% | -24.0% | -40.3% | -18.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.8% | +1.1% | +10.0% | -46.0% | -2.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.3% | -75.7% | -12.3% | +6.5% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.3% | -91.3% | -66.1% | +31.2% | -27.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.5% | +30.3% | -97.8% | +155.5% | +26.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -40.0% | -37.6% | -4.3% | +2.1% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVCR and BSX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BSX is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OBIO's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs BSX's 51.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.21x | 2.20x | 0.69x | 0.34x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.42 | $20.06 | $0.95 | $109.50 | $106.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.20 | $9.82 | $0.44 | $54.98 | $77.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.5% | +83.9% | +60.0% | +51.7% | +73.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.2 | 69.8 | 60.9 | 33.2 | 27.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 192K | 1.5M | 142K | 15.5M | 7.8M |
Analyst Outlook
MDT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OBIO as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", BSX as "Buy", MDT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 205.3% upside for OBIO (target: $12) vs 40.5% for MDT (target: $110). MDT is the only dividend payer here at 3.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $33.50 | — | $91.33 | $109.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 15 | — | 43 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% |
MDT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). BSX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
OBIO vs NVCR vs XTNT vs BSX vs MDT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OBIO or NVCR or XTNT or BSX or MDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.
(OBIO) is the stronger pick with 1169% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Medtronic plc (MDT). Medtronic plc (MDT) offers the better valuation at 21. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. (OBIO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OBIO or NVCR or XTNT or BSX or MDT?
On trailing P/E, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the cheapest at 21.
6x versus Boston Scientific Corporation at 29. 2x. On forward P/E, Medtronic plc is actually cheaper at 14. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OBIO or NVCR or XTNT or BSX or MDT?
Over the past 5 years, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) delivered a total return of +31.
2%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BSX returned +155. 5% versus XTNT's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OBIO or NVCR or XTNT or BSX or MDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
34β versus Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 21β — meaning OBIO is approximately 542% more volatile than BSX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. (OBIO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OBIO or NVCR or XTNT or BSX or MDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.
(OBIO) is pulling ahead at 1169% versus 3. 6% for Medtronic plc (MDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Boston Scientific Corporation grew EPS 55. 2% year-over-year, compared to 21. 8% for NovoCure Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, OBIO leads at 111. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OBIO or NVCR or XTNT or BSX or MDT?
Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
4% net margin versus -158. 2% for Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSX leads at 19. 8% versus -154. 7% for OBIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OBIO leads at 99. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OBIO or NVCR or XTNT or BSX or MDT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Medtronic plc (MDT) trades at 14.
1x forward P/E versus 16. 7x for Boston Scientific Corporation — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OBIO: 205. 3% to $12. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OBIO or NVCR or XTNT or BSX or MDT?
In this comparison, MDT (3.
6% yield) pays a dividend. OBIO, NVCR, XTNT, BSX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OBIO or NVCR or XTNT or BSX or MDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
47), 3. 6% yield). Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. (OBIO) carries a higher beta of 2. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDT: +26. 5%, OBIO: -65. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OBIO and NVCR and XTNT and BSX and MDT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OBIO is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XTNT is a small-cap high-growth stock; BSX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. MDT pays a dividend while OBIO, NVCR, XTNT, BSX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.