Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OBIO vs NVCR vs XTNT vs BSX vs MDT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OBIO
Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$222M
5Y Perf.-64.9%
NVCR
NovoCure Limited

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • JE
Market Cap$1.92B
5Y Perf.-79.7%
XTNT
Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareAMEX • US
Market Cap$80M
5Y Perf.-40.3%
BSX
Boston Scientific Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$84.08B
5Y Perf.+37.9%
MDT
Medtronic plc

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • IE
Market Cap$99.94B
5Y Perf.-27.5%

OBIO vs NVCR vs XTNT vs BSX vs MDT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OBIO logoOBIO
NVCR logoNVCR
XTNT logoXTNT
BSX logoBSX
MDT logoMDT
IndustryBiotechnologyMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - DevicesMedical - DevicesMedical - Devices
Market Cap$222M$1.92B$80M$84.08B$99.94B
Revenue (TTM)$33M$674M$133M$20.07B$35.48B
Net Income (TTM)$-53M$-173M$2M$2.89B$4.61B
Gross Margin99.4%75.2%62.0%69.0%61.9%
Operating Margin-154.7%-27.2%4.8%19.8%17.9%
Forward P/E16.7x14.1x
Total Debt$2M$290M$35M$12.42B$28.52B
Cash & Equiv.$35M$103M$6M$2.04B$2.22B

OBIO vs NVCR vs XTNT vs BSX vs MDTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OBIO
NVCR
XTNT
BSX
MDT
StockAug 20May 26Return
Orchestra BioMed Ho… (OBIO)10035.1-64.9%
NovoCure Limited (NVCR)10020.3-79.7%
Xtant Medical Holdi… (XTNT)10059.7-40.3%
Boston Scientific C… (BSX)100137.9+37.9%
Medtronic plc (MDT)10072.5-27.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OBIO vs NVCR vs XTNT vs BSX vs MDT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MDT leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. BSX also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OBIO
Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

OBIO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth 33.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 111.6%
  • 11.7% revenue growth vs MDT's 3.6%
  • +59.8% vs BSX's -46.0%
Best for: growth exposure
NVCR
NovoCure Limited
The Healthcare Pick

NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
XTNT
Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

Among these 5 stocks, XTNT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
BSX
Boston Scientific Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

BSX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 155.5% 10Y total return vs MDT's 26.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 50.7%, current ratio 1.62x
  • Beta 0.34, current ratio 1.62x
  • 14.4% margin vs OBIO's -158.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
MDT
Medtronic plc
The Income Pick

MDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 3.6%
  • Lower P/E (14.1x vs 16.7x)
  • 3.6% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 175.8% ROA vs OBIO's -65.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs -162.6%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthOBIO logoOBIO11.7% revenue growth vs MDT's 3.6%
ValueMDT logoMDTLower P/E (14.1x vs 16.7x)
Quality / MarginsBSX logoBSX14.4% margin vs OBIO's -158.2%
Stability / SafetyBSX logoBSXBeta 0.34 vs OBIO's 2.21
DividendsMDT logoMDT3.6% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)OBIO logoOBIO+59.8% vs BSX's -46.0%
Efficiency (ROA)MDT logoMDT175.8% ROA vs OBIO's -65.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs -162.6%

OBIO vs NVCR vs XTNT vs BSX vs MDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OBIOOrchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
100.0%$611,000
NVCRNovoCure Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

XTNTXtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
FY 2024
Orthobiologics
56.6%$66M
Spinal Implant
42.1%$49M
License Revenue
1.3%$2M
BSXBoston Scientific Corporation
FY 2025
Cardiovascular
66.0%$13.3B
MedSurg
34.0%$6.8B
MDTMedtronic plc
FY 2025
Cardiac and Vascular Group
37.3%$12.5B
Neuroscience Group
29.4%$9.8B
Medical Surgical
25.1%$8.4B
Diabetes Group
8.2%$2.8B

OBIO vs NVCR vs XTNT vs BSX vs MDT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBSXLAGGINGXTNT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — OBIO and BSX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.5B annually — 1059.8x OBIO's $33M. BSX is the more profitable business, keeping 14.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OBIO's -158.2%. On growth, OBIO holds the edge at +121.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOBIO logoOBIOOrchestra BioMed …NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedXTNT logoXTNTXtant Medical Hol…BSX logoBSXBoston Scientific…MDT logoMDTMedtronic plc
RevenueTrailing 12 months$33M$674M$133M$20.1B$35.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$52M-$165M$11M$4.7B$9.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$53M-$173M$2M$2.9B$4.6B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$49M-$48M$5M$3.6B$5.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+99.4%+75.2%+62.0%+69.0%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-154.7%-27.2%+4.8%+19.8%+17.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-158.2%-25.7%+1.3%+14.4%+13.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-147.7%-7.1%+3.9%+18.1%+15.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+121.2%+12.3%+19.0%+15.9%+8.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+166.7%-100.0%+123.7%+18.5%-11.9%
Evenly matched — OBIO and BSX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MDT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 21.6x trailing earnings, MDT trades at a 26% valuation discount to BSX's 29.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MDT's 14.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BSX's 25.3x.

MetricOBIO logoOBIOOrchestra BioMed …NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedXTNT logoXTNTXtant Medical Hol…BSX logoBSXBoston Scientific…MDT logoMDTMedtronic plc
Market CapShares × price$222M$1.9B$80M$84.1B$99.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$189M$2.1B$109M$94.5B$126.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.54x-13.80x-4.75x29.16x21.60x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.75x14.13x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate36.00x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple25.30x14.32x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.63x2.92x0.68x4.19x2.98x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2817.20x5.51x1.77x3.46x2.08x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.99x19.28x
MDT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BSX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

BSX delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-185 for OBIO. OBIO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BSX scores 7/9 vs XTNT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricOBIO logoOBIOOrchestra BioMed …NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedXTNT logoXTNTXtant Medical Hol…BSX logoBSXBoston Scientific…MDT logoMDTMedtronic plc
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-185.1%-50.8%+3.8%+12.4%+9.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-65.9%-16.5%+1.8%+6.9%+175.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-162.6%-16.4%-12.8%+8.8%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-65.5%-28.9%-17.9%+11.1%+7.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965276
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.85x0.82x0.51x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$33M$187M$29M$10.4B$26.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$35M$103M$6M$2.0B$2.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$290M$35M$12.4B$28.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-96.80x1.55x11.03x9.08x
BSX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BSX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BSX five years ago would be worth $13,117 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, OBIO leads with a +59.8% total return vs BSX's -46.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BSX at 2.1% vs OBIO's -40.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOBIO logoOBIOOrchestra BioMed …NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedXTNT logoXTNTXtant Medical Hol…BSX logoBSXBoston Scientific…MDT logoMDTMedtronic plc
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-8.8%+28.3%-24.0%-40.3%-18.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+59.8%+1.1%+10.0%-46.0%-2.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-78.3%-75.7%-12.3%+6.5%-4.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-62.3%-91.3%-66.1%+31.2%-27.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-65.5%+30.3%-97.8%+155.5%+26.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-40.0%-37.6%-4.3%+2.1%-1.4%
BSX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NVCR and BSX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BSX is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OBIO's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs BSX's 51.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOBIO logoOBIOOrchestra BioMed …NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedXTNT logoXTNTXtant Medical Hol…BSX logoBSXBoston Scientific…MDT logoMDTMedtronic plc
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.21x2.20x0.69x0.34x0.47x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.42$20.06$0.95$109.50$106.33
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.20$9.82$0.44$54.98$77.16
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+72.5%+83.9%+60.0%+51.7%+73.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.269.860.933.227.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded192K1.5M142K15.5M7.8M
Evenly matched — NVCR and BSX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MDT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: OBIO as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", BSX as "Buy", MDT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 205.3% upside for OBIO (target: $12) vs 40.5% for MDT (target: $110). MDT is the only dividend payer here at 3.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricOBIO logoOBIOOrchestra BioMed …NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedXTNT logoXTNTXtant Medical Hol…BSX logoBSXBoston Scientific…MDT logoMDTMedtronic plc
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$12.00$33.50$91.33$109.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts4154349
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises036
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.78
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+3.2%
MDT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MDT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). BSX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallBoston Scientific Corporati… (BSX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OBIO vs NVCR vs XTNT vs BSX vs MDT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OBIO or NVCR or XTNT or BSX or MDT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.

(OBIO) is the stronger pick with 1169% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Medtronic plc (MDT). Medtronic plc (MDT) offers the better valuation at 21. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. (OBIO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OBIO or NVCR or XTNT or BSX or MDT?

On trailing P/E, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the cheapest at 21.

6x versus Boston Scientific Corporation at 29. 2x. On forward P/E, Medtronic plc is actually cheaper at 14. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OBIO or NVCR or XTNT or BSX or MDT?

Over the past 5 years, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) delivered a total return of +31.

2%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BSX returned +155. 5% versus XTNT's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OBIO or NVCR or XTNT or BSX or MDT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

34β versus Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 21β — meaning OBIO is approximately 542% more volatile than BSX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. (OBIO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OBIO or NVCR or XTNT or BSX or MDT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.

(OBIO) is pulling ahead at 1169% versus 3. 6% for Medtronic plc (MDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Boston Scientific Corporation grew EPS 55. 2% year-over-year, compared to 21. 8% for NovoCure Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, OBIO leads at 111. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OBIO or NVCR or XTNT or BSX or MDT?

Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the more profitable company, earning 14.

4% net margin versus -158. 2% for Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSX leads at 19. 8% versus -154. 7% for OBIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OBIO leads at 99. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OBIO or NVCR or XTNT or BSX or MDT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Medtronic plc (MDT) trades at 14.

1x forward P/E versus 16. 7x for Boston Scientific Corporation — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OBIO: 205. 3% to $12. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OBIO or NVCR or XTNT or BSX or MDT?

In this comparison, MDT (3.

6% yield) pays a dividend. OBIO, NVCR, XTNT, BSX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is OBIO or NVCR or XTNT or BSX or MDT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

47), 3. 6% yield). Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. (OBIO) carries a higher beta of 2. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDT: +26. 5%, OBIO: -65. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OBIO and NVCR and XTNT and BSX and MDT?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OBIO is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XTNT is a small-cap high-growth stock; BSX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. MDT pays a dividend while OBIO, NVCR, XTNT, BSX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OBIO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6060%
  • Gross Margin > 59%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVCR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

XTNT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 37%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BSX

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MDT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform OBIO and NVCR and XTNT and BSX and MDT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(OBIO: 12120.2% · NVCR: 12.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.