Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
OCSL vs ARCC vs FSCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
OCSL vs ARCC vs FSCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $1.07B | $13.89B | $1.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $300M | $3.15B | $254M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $103M | $1.15B | $188M |
| Gross Margin | 87.2% | 75.7% | 81.3% |
| Operating Margin | 50.4% | 69.7% | 77.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.0x | 10.1x | 5.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.49B | $15.99B | $453M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $80M | $924M | $189M |
OCSL vs ARCC vs FSCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oaktree Specialty L… (OCSL) | 100 | 58.1 | -41.9% |
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 97.5 | -2.5% |
| FS Credit Opportuni… (FSCO) | 100 | 102.1 | +2.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OCSL vs ARCC vs FSCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OCSL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 60.9%, EPS growth -45.8%
- Beta 0.64, yield 14.2%, current ratio 11.20x
- 60.9% NII/revenue growth vs FSCO's -17.4%
ARCC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 142.3% 10Y total return vs FSCO's 74.0%
- +3.6% vs FSCO's -13.0%
FSCO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 13.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 31.9%, current ratio 5.84x
- NIM 8.9% vs ARCC's 3.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 60.9% NII/revenue growth vs FSCO's -17.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 10.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs OCSL's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs ARCC's 0.77, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 14.2% yield, vs FSCO's 13.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +3.6% vs FSCO's -13.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs OCSL's 0.4% |
OCSL vs ARCC vs FSCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OCSL leads in 2 of 6 categories
FSCO leads 2 • ARCC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OCSL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 12.4x FSCO's $254M. FSCO is the more profitable business, keeping 74.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OCSL's 11.3%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $300M | $3.1B | $254M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $122M | $2.0B | — |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $103M | $1.1B | — |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $1.1B | — |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.2% | +75.7% | +81.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +50.4% | +69.7% | +77.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +41.3% | +74.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +47.5% | +36.3% | +26.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.0% | -63.9% | — |
Valuation Metrics
OCSL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, FSCO trades at a 82% valuation discount to OCSL's 31.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSCO's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OCSL's 16.4x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $13.9B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $29.0B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.18x | 10.40x | 5.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.04x | 10.12x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.01x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.41x | 13.22x | 6.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.57x | 4.42x | 4.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | 0.94x | 0.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.52x | 12.17x | 15.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSCO leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSCO delivers a 13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for OCSL. FSCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARCC's 1.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OCSL scores 7/9 vs FSCO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +8.1% | +13.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | +3.8% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +5.7% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.9% | +7.5% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.01x | 1.12x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $15.1B | $264M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $80M | $924M | $189M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $16.0B | $453M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.11x | 2.98x | 4.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FSCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSCO five years ago would be worth $17,396 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,138 for OCSL. Over the past 12 months, ARCC leads with a +3.6% total return vs FSCO's -13.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSCO at 20.0% vs OCSL's 0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.3% | -3.0% | -12.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.7% | +3.6% | -13.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.7% | +37.9% | +72.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.4% | +50.2% | +74.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.3% | +142.3% | +74.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.2% | +11.3% | +20.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARCC and FSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FSCO is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARCC's 0.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARCC currently trades 82.6% from its 52-week high vs FSCO's 69.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.77x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.77 | $23.42 | $7.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.63 | $17.40 | $4.13 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.3% | +82.6% | +69.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.8 | 58.2 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 981K | 7.5M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OCSL and FSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OCSL as "Hold", ARCC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.1% upside for ARCC (target: $22) vs -1.3% for OCSL (target: $12). For income investors, OCSL offers the higher dividend yield at 14.16% vs ARCC's 1.98%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $21.88 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 32 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.2% | +2.0% | +13.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.72 | $0.38 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OCSL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FSCO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
OCSL vs ARCC vs FSCO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OCSL or ARCC or FSCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) is the stronger pick with 60.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OCSL or ARCC or FSCO?
On trailing P/E, FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
(FSCO) is the cheapest at 5. 6x versus Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation at 31. 2x. On forward P/E, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OCSL or ARCC or FSCO?
Over the past 5 years, FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
(FSCO) delivered a total return of +74. 0%, compared to +11. 4% for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARCC returned +142. 3% versus FSCO's +74. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OCSL or ARCC or FSCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
(FSCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 77β — meaning ARCC is approximately 20% more volatile than FSCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 112% for Ares Capital Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OCSL or ARCC or FSCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) is pulling ahead at 60.
9% versus -17. 4% for FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FS Credit Opportunities Corp. grew EPS -22. 8% year-over-year, compared to -45. 8% for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OCSL or ARCC or FSCO?
FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
(FSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 74. 2% net margin versus 11. 3% for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation — meaning it keeps 74. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSCO leads at 77. 5% versus 50. 4% for OCSL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OCSL leads at 87. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OCSL or ARCC or FSCO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) trades at 8.
0x forward P/E versus 10. 1x for Ares Capital Corporation — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARCC: 13. 1% to $21. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — OCSL or ARCC or FSCO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) offers the highest yield at 14. 2%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).
09Is OCSL or ARCC or FSCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
64), 14. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OCSL: +86. 3%, ARCC: +142. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OCSL and ARCC and FSCO?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OCSL is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FSCO is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.