Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OESX vs RVLV vs CPRI vs LEDS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Luxury Goods
Semiconductors
OESX vs RVLV vs CPRI vs LEDS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Specialty Retail | Luxury Goods | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $33M | $1.44B | $2.23B | $17M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $81M | $1.27B | $3.71B | $44M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $64M | $-504M | $-1M |
| Gross Margin | 29.9% | 53.6% | 61.4% | 4.9% |
| Operating Margin | -4.3% | 5.9% | -1.8% | -4.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.0x | 13.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $10M | $32M | $3.10B | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $292M | $166M | $3M |
OESX vs RVLV vs CPRI vs LEDS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orion Energy System… (OESX) | 100 | 22.1 | -77.9% |
| Revolve Group, Inc. (RVLV) | 100 | 148.4 | +48.4% |
| Capri Holdings Limi… (CPRI) | 100 | 123.2 | +23.2% |
| SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) | 100 | 71.5 | -28.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OESX vs RVLV vs CPRI vs LEDS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OESX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.10
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 86.9%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 1.10, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 1.10 vs CPRI's 2.03, lower leverage
RVLV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 5.1% margin vs CPRI's -13.6%
- 8.4% ROA vs CPRI's -15.1%, ROIC 23.5% vs -13.6%
CPRI is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (13.4x vs 23.0x)
LEDS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth 53.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 82.7%
- 9.7% 10Y total return vs RVLV's -40.5%
- 7.3% revenue growth vs OESX's -12.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.3% revenue growth vs OESX's -12.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 23.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.1% margin vs CPRI's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs CPRI's 2.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.2% vs LEDS's -6.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.4% ROA vs CPRI's -15.1%, ROIC 23.5% vs -13.6% |
OESX vs RVLV vs CPRI vs LEDS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OESX vs RVLV vs CPRI vs LEDS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RVLV leads in 2 of 6 categories
LEDS leads 1 • OESX leads 0 • CPRI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RVLV and CPRI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRI is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 83.8x LEDS's $44M. RVLV is the more profitable business, keeping 5.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPRI's -13.6%. On growth, LEDS holds the edge at +103.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $81M | $1.3B | $3.7B | $44M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $79M | $72M | -$1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | $64M | -$504M | -$1M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $348M | $47M | $491M | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.9% | +53.6% | +61.4% | +4.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +5.9% | -1.8% | -4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +5.1% | -13.6% | -3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +3.7% | +13.2% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.7% | +15.6% | -18.7% | +103.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +109.6% | +25.0% | +120.8% | -18.7% |
Valuation Metrics
LEDS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33M | $1.4B | $2.2B | $17M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $37M | $1.2B | $5.2B | $18M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.57x | 23.52x | -1.87x | -13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.03x | 13.36x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 13.74x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.01x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.41x | 1.18x | 0.50x | 0.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.56x | 2.85x | 5.94x | 5.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 66.51x | 30.08x | 14.55x | 10.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RVLV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RVLV delivers a 12.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-5 for CPRI. RVLV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPRI's 8.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LEDS scores 6/9 vs CPRI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.0% | +12.8% | -4.7% | -64.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.0% | +8.4% | -15.1% | -9.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -34.8% | +23.5% | -13.6% | -24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.9% | +14.8% | -17.0% | -38.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.87x | 0.06x | 8.34x | 1.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | -$260M | $2.9B | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $292M | $166M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $32M | $3.1B | $4M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.29x | — | — | -14.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RVLV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RVLV five years ago would be worth $3,479 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,637 for OESX. Over the past 12 months, OESX leads with a +31.2% total return vs LEDS's -6.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RVLV at 3.1% vs CPRI's -20.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.0% | -31.6% | -23.4% | +25.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.2% | +18.5% | +18.4% | -6.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.7% | +9.7% | -50.5% | +0.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.6% | -65.2% | -68.6% | -74.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.5% | -40.5% | -63.1% | +9.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.1% | +3.1% | -20.9% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OESX and CPRI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OESX is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CPRI's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CPRI currently trades 66.1% from its 52-week high vs OESX's 49.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.03x | 1.73x | 2.03x | 2.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.64 | $31.68 | $28.27 | $3.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.50 | $16.80 | $15.37 | $1.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.6% | +63.9% | +66.1% | +60.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.8 | 26.7 | 47.3 | 73.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 39K | 931K | 2.5M | 23K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RVLV as "Buy", CPRI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 46.1% upside for RVLV (target: $30) vs 35.5% for CPRI (target: $25).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.56 | $25.33 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 30 | 53 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.1% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
RVLV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). LEDS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
OESX vs RVLV vs CPRI vs LEDS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OESX or RVLV or CPRI or LEDS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) is the stronger pick with 729.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 0% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX). Revolve Group, Inc. (RVLV) offers the better valuation at 23. 5x trailing P/E (23. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Revolve Group, Inc. (RVLV) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OESX or RVLV or CPRI or LEDS?
On forward P/E, Capri Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 13.
4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OESX or RVLV or CPRI or LEDS?
Over the past 5 years, Revolve Group, Inc.
(RVLV) delivered a total return of -65. 2%, compared to -83. 6% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LEDS returned +12. 4% versus CPRI's -63. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OESX or RVLV or CPRI or LEDS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
(OESX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus SemiLEDs Corporation's 2. 05β — meaning LEDS is approximately 98% more volatile than OESX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Revolve Group, Inc. (RVLV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 8% for Capri Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OESX or RVLV or CPRI or LEDS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) is pulling ahead at 729.
8% versus -12. 0% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SemiLEDs Corporation grew EPS 53. 1% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Capri Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, LEDS leads at 82. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OESX or RVLV or CPRI or LEDS?
Revolve Group, Inc.
(RVLV) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 0% net margin versus -26. 6% for Capri Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RVLV leads at 6. 1% versus -16. 9% for CPRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPRI leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OESX or RVLV or CPRI or LEDS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) trades at 13.
4x forward P/E versus 23. 0x for Revolve Group, Inc. — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RVLV: 46. 1% to $29. 56.
08Which pays a better dividend — OESX or RVLV or CPRI or LEDS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is OESX or RVLV or CPRI or LEDS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
(OESX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03)). Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OESX: -27. 9%, CPRI: -63. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OESX and RVLV and CPRI and LEDS?
These companies operate in different sectors (OESX (Industrials) and RVLV (Consumer Cyclical) and CPRI (Consumer Cyclical) and LEDS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OESX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RVLV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CPRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LEDS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.