Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OESX vs SPIR vs ASTS vs LEDS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Semiconductors
OESX vs SPIR vs ASTS vs LEDS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $33M | $529.86B | $19.12B | $17M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $81M | $72M | $71M | $44M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $-1M |
| Gross Margin | 29.9% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 4.9% |
| Operating Margin | -4.3% | -121.4% | -405.7% | -4.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.0x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $10M | $8.76B | $32M | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $3M |
OESX vs SPIR vs ASTS vs LEDS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orion Energy System… (OESX) | 100 | 9.0 | -91.0% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 20.5 | -79.5% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 645.4 | +545.4% |
| SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) | 100 | 64.6 | -35.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OESX vs SPIR vs ASTS vs LEDS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OESX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.10
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 86.9%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 1.10, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 1.10 vs SPIR's 2.93
SPIR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs LEDS's 9.7%
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
- +158.1% vs LEDS's -6.0%
LEDS is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- -3.0% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -3.0% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +158.1% vs LEDS's -6.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.0% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC -34.8% vs -0.1% |
OESX vs SPIR vs ASTS vs LEDS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OESX vs SPIR vs ASTS vs LEDS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OESX leads in 1 of 6 categories
LEDS leads 1 • SPIR leads 1 • ASTS leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OESX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OESX is the larger business by revenue, generating $81M annually — 1.8x LEDS's $44M. LEDS is the more profitable business, keeping -3.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $81M | $72M | $71M | $44M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | -$74M | -$237M | -$1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$25.0B | -$342M | -$1M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $348M | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.9% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +4.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | -121.4% | -4.1% | -4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | -349.6% | -4.8% | -3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | -227.0% | -16.0% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.7% | -26.9% | +27.3% | +103.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +109.6% | +59.5% | -55.6% | -18.7% |
Valuation Metrics
LEDS leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33M | $529.9B | $19.1B | $17M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $37M | $513.8B | $16.8B | $18M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.57x | 10.01x | -48.76x | -13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.41x | 7405.21x | 269.64x | 0.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.56x | 4.56x | 5.68x | 5.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 66.51x | — | — | 10.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPIR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OESX delivers a -0.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-0 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LEDS's 1.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LEDS scores 6/9 vs OESX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.0% | -88.4% | -21.1% | -64.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.0% | -47.3% | -12.6% | -9.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -34.8% | -0.1% | -47.1% | -24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.9% | -0.1% | -10.0% | -38.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.87x | 0.08x | 0.01x | 1.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $8.8B | $32M | $4M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.29x | 9.20x | -21.20x | -14.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,637 for OESX. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +158.1% total return vs LEDS's -6.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs OESX's -15.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.0% | +106.4% | -21.7% | +25.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.2% | +73.1% | +158.1% | -6.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.7% | +198.1% | +1194.0% | +0.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.6% | -79.6% | +688.2% | -74.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.5% | -78.8% | +568.8% | +9.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.1% | +43.9% | +134.8% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OESX and SPIR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OESX is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPIR currently trades 68.3% from its 52-week high vs OESX's 49.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 2.93x | 2.82x | 1.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.64 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $3.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.50 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $1.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.6% | +68.3% | +50.3% | +60.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.8 | 55.5 | 41.8 | 73.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 39K | 1.6M | 14.9M | 23K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.6% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs 7.0% for SPIR (target: $17).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.25 | $103.65 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 7 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OESX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). LEDS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
OESX vs SPIR vs ASTS vs LEDS: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OESX or SPIR or ASTS or LEDS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OESX or SPIR or ASTS or LEDS?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -83. 6% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus SPIR's -78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OESX or SPIR or ASTS or LEDS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
(OESX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 168% more volatile than OESX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 144% for SemiLEDs Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OESX or SPIR or ASTS or LEDS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LEDS leads at 82. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OESX or SPIR or ASTS or LEDS?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LEDS leads at -3. 7% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTS leads at 53. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OESX or SPIR or ASTS or LEDS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is OESX or SPIR or ASTS or LEDS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
(OESX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10)). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OESX: -32. 5%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OESX and SPIR and ASTS and LEDS?
These companies operate in different sectors (OESX (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and LEDS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OESX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LEDS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.