Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OFG vs BPOP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
OFG vs BPOP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.96B | $9.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $863M | $4.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $205M | $833M |
| Gross Margin | 71.2% | 66.1% |
| Operating Margin | 30.8% | 22.7% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 9.9x |
| Total Debt | $580M | $1.58B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.04B | $403M |
OFG vs BPOP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OFG Bancorp (OFG) | 100 | 374.7 | +274.7% |
| Popular, Inc. (BPOP) | 100 | 375.7 | +275.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OFG vs BPOP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OFG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.4%
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs BPOP's 478.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 41.8%, current ratio 0.12x
BPOP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.7%, EPS growth 43.7%
- 5.7% NII/revenue growth vs OFG's 4.8%
- +52.1% vs OFG's +13.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.7% NII/revenue growth vs OFG's 4.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 9.9x), PEG 0.35 vs 0.62 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BPOP's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs BPOP's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs BPOP's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs OFG's +13.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BPOP's 0.4% |
OFG vs BPOP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OFG vs BPOP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OFG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BPOP is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 5.1x OFG's $863M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 23.8% (OFG) to 18.8% (BPOP).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $863M | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $285M | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $205M | $833M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $199M | $681M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.2% | +66.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.8% | +22.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.3% | +40.6% |
Valuation Metrics
OFG leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.1x trailing earnings, OFG trades at a 16% valuation discount to BPOP's 12.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), OFG offers better value at 0.37x vs BPOP's 0.76x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $10.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.14x | 12.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.66x | 9.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.37x | 0.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.26x | 10.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.27x | 2.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.55x | 1.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.84x | 14.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OFG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OFG delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $14 for BPOP. BPOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OFG's 0.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BPOP scores 7/9 vs OFG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.2% | +13.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.4% | +14.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$460M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $403M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $580M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.54x | 0.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BPOP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BPOP five years ago would be worth $20,636 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,602 for OFG. Over the past 12 months, BPOP leads with a +52.1% total return vs OFG's +13.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BPOP at 40.2% vs OFG's 26.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.8% | +18.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.5% | +52.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.5% | +175.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.0% | +106.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +518.7% | +478.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.1% | +40.2% |
Risk & Volatility
OFG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OFG is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BPOP's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.85 | $152.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.71 | $97.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +97.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.6 | 57.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 300K | 506K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OFG and BPOP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OFG as "Buy" and BPOP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.4% upside for BPOP (target: $159) vs -2.3% for OFG (target: $45). For income investors, OFG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.41% vs BPOP's 1.97%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.50 | $159.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.10 | $2.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.7% | +5.2% |
OFG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BPOP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
OFG vs BPOP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OFG or BPOP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Popular, Inc.
(BPOP) is the stronger pick with 5. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 8% for OFG Bancorp (OFG). OFG Bancorp (OFG) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OFG Bancorp (OFG) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OFG or BPOP?
On trailing P/E, OFG Bancorp (OFG) is the cheapest at 10.
1x versus Popular, Inc. at 12. 1x. On forward P/E, OFG Bancorp is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: OFG Bancorp wins at 0. 35x versus Popular, Inc. 's 0. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OFG or BPOP?
Over the past 5 years, Popular, Inc.
(BPOP) delivered a total return of +106. 4%, compared to +106. 0% for OFG Bancorp (OFG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OFG returned +518. 7% versus BPOP's +478. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OFG or BPOP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), OFG Bancorp (OFG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
70β versus Popular, Inc. 's 0. 94β — meaning BPOP is approximately 34% more volatile than OFG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Popular, Inc. (BPOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 42% for OFG Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OFG or BPOP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Popular, Inc.
(BPOP) is pulling ahead at 5. 7% versus 4. 8% for OFG Bancorp (OFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Popular, Inc. grew EPS 43. 7% year-over-year, compared to 6. 1% for OFG Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OFG or BPOP?
OFG Bancorp (OFG) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
8% net margin versus 18. 8% for Popular, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OFG leads at 30. 8% versus 22. 7% for BPOP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OFG leads at 71. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OFG or BPOP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, OFG Bancorp (OFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Popular, Inc. 's 0. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, OFG Bancorp (OFG) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 9. 9x for Popular, Inc. — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BPOP: 7. 4% to $159. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — OFG or BPOP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
OFG Bancorp (OFG) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 2. 0% for Popular, Inc. (BPOP).
09Is OFG or BPOP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, OFG Bancorp (OFG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
70), 2. 4% yield, +518. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OFG: +518. 7%, BPOP: +478. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OFG and BPOP?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.