Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OFG vs BPOP vs FBP vs IBCP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
OFG vs BPOP vs FBP vs IBCP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.96B | $9.64B | $3.77B | $690M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $863M | $4.43B | $1.26B | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $205M | $833M | $345M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 71.2% | 66.1% | 72.9% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 30.8% | 22.7% | 33.2% | 25.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 9.9x | 10.9x | 9.4x |
| Total Debt | $580M | $1.58B | $364M | $117M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.04B | $403M | $657M | $52M |
OFG vs BPOP vs FBP vs IBCP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OFG Bancorp (OFG) | 100 | 374.7 | +274.7% |
| Popular, Inc. (BPOP) | 100 | 375.7 | +275.7% |
| First BanCorp. (FBP) | 100 | 442.2 | +342.2% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 242.5 | +142.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OFG vs BPOP vs FBP vs IBCP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OFG is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 4.9% vs IBCP's 3.3%
- Beta 0.70 vs BPOP's 0.94
BPOP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.7%, EPS growth 43.7%
- 5.7% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3%
- +52.1% vs IBCP's +11.2%
FBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs OFG's 5.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 18.5%, current ratio 6.85x
- PEG 0.30 vs IBCP's 1.79
- PEG 0.30 vs 0.62
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.1%
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.1%, current ratio 370.62x
- 3.1% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs BPOP's 2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.7% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3% | |
| Value | PEG 0.30 vs 0.62 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs IBCP's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs BPOP's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs BPOP's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs IBCP's +11.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs IBCP's 0.4% |
OFG vs BPOP vs FBP vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OFG vs BPOP vs FBP vs IBCP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FBP leads in 2 of 6 categories
BPOP leads 1 • OFG leads 0 • IBCP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FBP leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BPOP is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 14.0x IBCP's $315M. FBP is the more profitable business, keeping 27.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BPOP's 18.8%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $863M | $4.4B | $1.3B | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $285M | $1.0B | $433M | $89M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $205M | $833M | $345M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $199M | $681M | $440M | $70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.2% | +66.1% | +72.9% | +69.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.8% | +22.7% | +33.2% | +25.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +18.8% | +27.4% | +21.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +15.4% | +34.5% | +22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.3% | +40.6% | +19.6% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OFG and FBP and IBCP each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.1x trailing earnings, OFG trades at a 16% valuation discount to BPOP's 12.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBP offers better value at 0.31x vs IBCP's 1.95x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $9.6B | $3.8B | $690M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $10.8B | $3.5B | $755M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.14x | 12.06x | 11.25x | 10.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.66x | 9.94x | 10.93x | 9.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.37x | 0.76x | 0.31x | 1.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.26x | 10.75x | 8.34x | 9.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.27x | 2.18x | 3.00x | 2.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.55x | 1.61x | 1.98x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.84x | 14.16x | 8.68x | 9.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FBP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBP delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $14 for BPOP. FBP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OFG's 0.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBP scores 9/9 vs OFG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.2% | +13.8% | +18.4% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +1.1% | +1.8% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | +10.2% | +13.7% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.4% | +14.1% | +3.9% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 0.25x | 0.19x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$460M | $1.2B | -$293M | $65M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $403M | $657M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $580M | $1.6B | $364M | $117M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.54x | 0.81x | 1.64x | 0.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BPOP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBP five years ago would be worth $21,019 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,340 for IBCP. Over the past 12 months, BPOP leads with a +52.1% total return vs IBCP's +11.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BPOP at 40.2% vs OFG's 26.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.8% | +18.4% | +16.7% | +5.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.5% | +52.1% | +23.6% | +11.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.5% | +175.5% | +131.6% | +123.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.0% | +106.4% | +110.2% | +63.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +518.7% | +478.2% | +648.0% | +181.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.1% | +40.2% | +32.3% | +30.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OFG and FBP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OFG is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BPOP's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FBP currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 89.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.94x | 0.79x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.85 | $152.95 | $24.51 | $37.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.71 | $97.08 | $19.16 | $29.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +97.0% | +98.7% | +89.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.6 | 57.6 | 58.9 | 43.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 300K | 506K | 1.4M | 177K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BPOP and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OFG as "Buy", BPOP as "Buy", FBP as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for IBCP (target: $38) vs -2.3% for OFG (target: $45). For income investors, IBCP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.09% vs BPOP's 1.97%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.50 | $159.33 | $25.50 | $38.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 20 | 16 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +2.0% | +3.0% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 12 | 9 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.10 | $2.92 | $0.72 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.7% | +5.2% | +4.1% | +1.8% |
FBP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BPOP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
OFG vs BPOP vs FBP vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OFG or BPOP or FBP or IBCP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Popular, Inc.
(BPOP) is the stronger pick with 5. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). OFG Bancorp (OFG) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OFG Bancorp (OFG) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OFG or BPOP or FBP or IBCP?
On trailing P/E, OFG Bancorp (OFG) is the cheapest at 10.
1x versus Popular, Inc. at 12. 1x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First BanCorp. wins at 0. 30x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 79x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OFG or BPOP or FBP or IBCP?
Over the past 5 years, First BanCorp.
(FBP) delivered a total return of +110. 2%, compared to +63. 4% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBP returned +648. 0% versus IBCP's +181. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OFG or BPOP or FBP or IBCP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), OFG Bancorp (OFG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
70β versus Popular, Inc. 's 0. 94β — meaning BPOP is approximately 34% more volatile than OFG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First BanCorp. (FBP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 42% for OFG Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OFG or BPOP or FBP or IBCP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Popular, Inc.
(BPOP) is pulling ahead at 5. 7% versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Popular, Inc. grew EPS 43. 7% year-over-year, compared to 3. 5% for Independent Bank Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OFG or BPOP or FBP or IBCP?
First BanCorp.
(FBP) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 4% net margin versus 18. 8% for Popular, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FBP leads at 33. 2% versus 22. 7% for BPOP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBP leads at 72. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OFG or BPOP or FBP or IBCP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First BanCorp. (FBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 30x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 79x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for First BanCorp. — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBCP: 13. 4% to $38. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OFG or BPOP or FBP or IBCP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 2. 0% for Popular, Inc. (BPOP).
09Is OFG or BPOP or FBP or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First BanCorp.
(FBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 79), 3. 0% yield, +648. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FBP: +648. 0%, IBCP: +181. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OFG and BPOP and FBP and IBCP?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.