Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OFLX vs NFBK vs CSGS vs KRNY vs CSGP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Software - Infrastructure
Banks - Regional
Real Estate - Services
OFLX vs NFBK vs CSGS vs KRNY vs CSGP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Banks - Regional | Software - Infrastructure | Banks - Regional | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $308M | $588M | $2.29B | $508M | $14.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $98M | $251M | $1.24B | $344M | $3.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $39M | $64M | $32M | $25M |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 49.1% | 48.3% | 44.1% | 77.4% |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | 16.1% | 13.9% | 9.0% | -0.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.6x | 10.4x | 15.9x | 12.9x | 25.8x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $760M | $587M | $1.26B | $1.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $53M | $168M | $180M | $167M | $1.73B |
OFLX vs NFBK vs CSGS vs KRNY vs CSGP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omega Flex, Inc. (OFLX) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
| Northfield Bancorp,… (NFBK) | 100 | 128.7 | +28.7% |
| CSG Systems Interna… (CSGS) | 100 | 169.8 | +69.8% |
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 94.3 | -5.7% |
| CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) | 100 | 53.3 | -46.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OFLX vs NFBK vs CSGS vs KRNY vs CSGP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OFLX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 13.6% margin vs CSGP's 0.7%
- 12.9% ROA vs CSGP's 0.2%, ROIC 35.1% vs -0.9%
NFBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.
- NIM 2.0% vs KRNY's 1.7%
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 25.8x)
CSGS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 114.6% 10Y total return vs CSGP's 77.5%
- Beta 0.44 vs OFLX's 1.35
KRNY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 5.5%
- Beta 0.83, yield 5.5%, current ratio 1.20x
- 5.5% yield, vs NFBK's 3.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +37.9% vs CSGP's -53.6%
CSGP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 18.7%, EPS growth -95.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 13.7%, current ratio 2.84x
- 18.7% FFO/revenue growth vs OFLX's -3.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.7% FFO/revenue growth vs OFLX's -3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 25.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs CSGP's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.44 vs OFLX's 1.35 | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, vs NFBK's 3.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.9% vs CSGP's -53.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.9% ROA vs CSGP's 0.2%, ROIC 35.1% vs -0.9% |
OFLX vs NFBK vs CSGS vs KRNY vs CSGP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OFLX vs NFBK vs CSGS vs KRNY vs CSGP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CSGS leads in 2 of 6 categories
CSGP leads 1 • KRNY leads 1 • OFLX leads 1 • NFBK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSGP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSGP is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 34.8x OFLX's $98M. OFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CSGP's 0.7%. On growth, CSGP holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $98M | $251M | $1.2B | $344M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16M | $61M | $225M | $43M | $278M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $39M | $64M | $32M | $25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | $42M | $131M | $40M | $241M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +49.1% | +48.3% | +44.1% | +77.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +16.1% | +13.9% | +9.0% | -0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +11.9% | +5.1% | +7.6% | +0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +11.9% | +10.6% | +6.2% | +7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.0% | — | +4.8% | — | +22.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.0% | +68.8% | +45.6% | +50.0% | +127.7% |
Valuation Metrics
KRNY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.2x trailing earnings, KRNY trades at a 99% valuation discount to CSGP's 2107.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CSGS's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSGP's 83.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $308M | $588M | $2.3B | $508M | $14.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $259M | $1.2B | $2.7B | $1.6B | $14.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.73x | 19.54x | 40.60x | 19.24x | 2107.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.60x | 10.42x | 15.86x | 12.93x | 25.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 23.89x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.16x | 24.19x | 7.26x | 44.52x | 83.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.13x | 2.34x | 1.87x | 1.48x | 4.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.66x | 0.83x | 8.00x | 0.68x | 1.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.04x | 19.64x | 16.21x | 23.76x | 361.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSGS delivers a 22.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $0 for CSGP. OFLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSGS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFBK scores 7/9 vs CSGP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.9% | +5.5% | +22.0% | +4.3% | +0.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.9% | +0.7% | +4.3% | +0.4% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +35.1% | +2.0% | +32.5% | +1.1% | -0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.1% | +2.5% | +33.7% | +1.5% | -0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 1.08x | 2.07x | 1.68x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$48M | $592M | $407M | $1.1B | -$589M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $53M | $168M | $180M | $167M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $760M | $587M | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.46x | 6.10x | 0.22x | 1.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CSGS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSGS five years ago would be worth $18,936 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,377 for OFLX. Over the past 12 months, KRNY leads with a +37.9% total return vs CSGP's -53.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSGS at 19.9% vs OFLX's -32.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.9% | +26.5% | +5.2% | +12.9% | -46.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.8% | +31.5% | +33.5% | +37.9% | -53.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.2% | +65.7% | +72.4% | +32.6% | -52.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.2% | +0.2% | +89.4% | -20.5% | -58.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.0% | +20.6% | +114.6% | -9.0% | +77.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.5% | +18.3% | +19.9% | +9.9% | -22.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CSGS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CSGS is the less volatile stock with a 0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OFLX's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSGS currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs CSGP's 35.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 1.00x | 0.44x | 0.83x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.92 | $14.21 | $80.67 | $8.50 | $97.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.58 | $9.90 | $60.04 | $5.76 | $33.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.4% | +99.0% | +99.7% | +95.1% | +35.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.6 | 57.0 | 56.6 | 55.8 | 30.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 258K | 342K | 298K | 5.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NFBK and KRNY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFBK as "Hold", CSGS as "Buy", KRNY as "Hold", CSGP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 77.0% upside for CSGP (target: $62) vs 0.4% for CSGS (target: $81). For income investors, KRNY offers the higher dividend yield at 5.45% vs CSGS's 1.65%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.50 | $80.70 | $9.50 | $61.91 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 15 | 5 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +3.7% | +1.6% | +5.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 10 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.36 | $0.52 | $1.33 | $0.44 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% | +3.6% | +0.1% | +3.9% |
CSGS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). CSGP leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
OFLX vs NFBK vs CSGS vs KRNY vs CSGP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OFLX or NFBK or CSGS or KRNY or CSGP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Omega Flex, Inc. (OFLX). Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY) offers the better valuation at 19. 2x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CSG Systems International, Inc. (CSGS) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OFLX or NFBK or CSGS or KRNY or CSGP?
On trailing P/E, Kearny Financial Corp.
(KRNY) is the cheapest at 19. 2x versus CoStar Group, Inc. at 2107. 2x. On forward P/E, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OFLX or NFBK or CSGS or KRNY or CSGP?
Over the past 5 years, CSG Systems International, Inc.
(CSGS) delivered a total return of +89. 4%, compared to -76. 2% for Omega Flex, Inc. (OFLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSGS returned +114. 6% versus KRNY's -9. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OFLX or NFBK or CSGS or KRNY or CSGP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CSG Systems International, Inc.
(CSGS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 44β versus Omega Flex, Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning OFLX is approximately 206% more volatile than CSGS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Omega Flex, Inc. (OFLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 2% for CSG Systems International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OFLX or NFBK or CSGS or KRNY or CSGP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus -3. 3% for Omega Flex, Inc. (OFLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kearny Financial Corp. grew EPS 130. 2% year-over-year, compared to -95. 1% for CoStar Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CSGP leads at 14. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OFLX or NFBK or CSGS or KRNY or CSGP?
Omega Flex, Inc.
(OFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 1% net margin versus 0. 2% for CoStar Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSGS leads at 24. 5% versus -2. 2% for CSGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSGP leads at 75. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OFLX or NFBK or CSGS or KRNY or CSGP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 8x for CoStar Group, Inc. — 15. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CSGP: 77. 0% to $61. 91.
08Which pays a better dividend — OFLX or NFBK or CSGS or KRNY or CSGP?
In this comparison, KRNY (5.
5% yield), OFLX (4. 5% yield), NFBK (3. 7% yield), CSGS (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. CSGP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OFLX or NFBK or CSGS or KRNY or CSGP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CSG Systems International, Inc.
(CSGS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 44), 1. 6% yield, +114. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSGS: +114. 6%, OFLX: +39. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OFLX and NFBK and CSGS and KRNY and CSGP?
These companies operate in different sectors (OFLX (Industrials) and NFBK (Financial Services) and CSGS (Technology) and KRNY (Financial Services) and CSGP (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OFLX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NFBK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CSGS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CSGP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. OFLX, NFBK, CSGS, KRNY pay a dividend while CSGP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.