Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OFS vs MRCC vs GAIN vs CSWC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OFS
OFS Capital Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$52M
5Y Perf.-21.8%
MRCC
Monroe Capital Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$110M
5Y Perf.-40.8%
GAIN
Gladstone Investment Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$657M
5Y Perf.+48.9%
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.43B
5Y Perf.+71.6%

OFS vs MRCC vs GAIN vs CSWC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OFS logoOFS
MRCC logoMRCC
GAIN logoGAIN
CSWC logoCSWC
IndustryAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset Management
Market Cap$52M$110M$657M$1.43B
Revenue (TTM)$-12M$21M$90M$164M
Net Income (TTM)$-33M$-5M$130M$103M
Gross Margin239.8%60.8%68.6%66.5%
Operating Margin280.2%51.7%72.7%48.5%
Forward P/E14.9x40.7x10.1x
Total Debt$218M$191M$456M$956M
Cash & Equiv.$3M$2M$14M$43M

OFS vs MRCC vs GAIN vs CSWCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OFS
MRCC
GAIN
CSWC
StockMay 20May 26Return
OFS Capital Corpora… (OFS)10078.2-21.8%
Monroe Capital Corp… (MRCC)10059.2-40.8%
Gladstone Investmen… (GAIN)100148.9+48.9%
Capital Southwest C… (CSWC)100171.6+71.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OFS vs MRCC vs GAIN vs CSWC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CSWC leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Monroe Capital Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. OFS and GAIN also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OFS
OFS Capital Corporation
The Banking Pick

OFS is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 30.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CSWC's 10.2%
Best for: dividends
MRCC
Monroe Capital Corporation
The Banking Pick

MRCC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs CSWC's 0.2% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs CSWC's 0.2%
Best for: quality and efficiency
GAIN
Gladstone Investment Corporation
The Banking Pick

GAIN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 319.3% 10Y total return vs CSWC's 234.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 91.3%, current ratio 3.69x
  • Beta 0.53, yield 10.0%, current ratio 3.69x
  • Beta 0.53 vs OFS's 0.90, lower leverage
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
The Banking Pick

CSWC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 10.2%
  • Rev growth 7.7%, EPS growth -28.3%
  • NIM 7.0% vs GAIN's 5.5%
  • 7.7% NII/revenue growth vs OFS's -124.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCSWC logoCSWC7.7% NII/revenue growth vs OFS's -124.6%
ValueCSWC logoCSWCLower P/E (10.1x vs 40.7x)
Quality / MarginsMRCC logoMRCCEfficiency ratio 0.1% vs CSWC's 0.2% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyGAIN logoGAINBeta 0.53 vs OFS's 0.90, lower leverage
DividendsOFS logoOFS30.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CSWC's 10.2%
Momentum (1Y)CSWC logoCSWC+34.0% vs OFS's -42.1%
Efficiency (ROA)MRCC logoMRCCEfficiency ratio 0.1% vs CSWC's 0.2%

OFS vs MRCC vs GAIN vs CSWC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLOFSLAGGINGCSWC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

OFS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

CSWC and OFS operate at a comparable scale, with $164M and -$12M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.8% (OFS) to 43.1% (CSWC).

MetricOFS logoOFSOFS Capital Corpo…MRCC logoMRCCMonroe Capital Co…GAIN logoGAINGladstone Investm…CSWC logoCSWCCapital Southwest…
RevenueTrailing 12 months-$12M$21M$90M$164M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$33M$11M$58M$142M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$33M-$5M$130M$103M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$35M$25M-$82M-$69M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+2.4%+60.8%+68.6%+66.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.8%+51.7%+72.7%+48.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.8%+53.8%+72.7%+43.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.7%+5.5%+126.8%-132.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-142.6%-51.5%+58.1%+113.3%
OFS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — OFS and MRCC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.3x trailing earnings, GAIN trades at a 43% valuation discount to CSWC's 16.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GAIN's 16.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSWC's 27.4x.

MetricOFS logoOFSOFS Capital Corpo…MRCC logoMRCCMonroe Capital Co…GAIN logoGAINGladstone Investm…CSWC logoCSWCCapital Southwest…
Market CapShares × price$52M$110M$657M$1.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$267M$108M$1.1B$2.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.58x9.58x9.28x16.32x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.94x40.66x10.06x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.21x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.82x27.43x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.55x7.31x8.71x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.42x0.66x1.22x1.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF1.20x0.95x5.77x
Evenly matched — OFS and MRCC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GAIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

GAIN delivers a 21.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-23 for OFS. GAIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.91x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OFS's 1.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MRCC scores 6/9 vs CSWC's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricOFS logoOFSOFS Capital Corpo…MRCC logoMRCCMonroe Capital Co…GAIN logoGAINGladstone Investm…CSWC logoCSWCCapital Southwest…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-23.4%-2.9%+21.9%+10.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-8.6%-1.3%+10.5%+4.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-6.5%+2.0%+5.3%+3.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-8.7%+2.6%+6.8%+4.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94641
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.77x1.15x0.91x1.08x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$214M$189M$441M$913M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$2M$14M$43M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$218M$191M$456M$956M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.00x0.69x1.58x2.91x
GAIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — GAIN and CSWC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GAIN five years ago would be worth $17,205 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,905 for MRCC. Over the past 12 months, CSWC leads with a +34.0% total return vs OFS's -42.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSWC at 20.7% vs OFS's -7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOFS logoOFSOFS Capital Corpo…MRCC logoMRCCMonroe Capital Co…GAIN logoGAINGladstone Investm…CSWC logoCSWCCapital Southwest…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-14.9%-11.4%+20.7%+11.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-42.1%-6.8%+30.8%+34.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-20.8%+18.0%+56.5%+75.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+4.9%-0.9%+72.0%+51.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+23.8%+22.8%+319.3%+234.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-7.5%+5.7%+16.1%+20.7%
Evenly matched — GAIN and CSWC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GAIN and CSWC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GAIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OFS's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSWC currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs OFS's 41.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOFS logoOFSOFS Capital Corpo…MRCC logoMRCCMonroe Capital Co…GAIN logoGAINGladstone Investm…CSWC logoCSWCCapital Southwest…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.90x0.74x0.53x0.84x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.31$7.76$17.14$24.43
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.72$4.04$13.11$19.37
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+41.9%+65.5%+96.3%+98.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.750.469.963.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded100K156K371K664K
Evenly matched — GAIN and CSWC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — OFS and CSWC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MRCC as "Hold", GAIN as "Hold", CSWC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.5% upside for MRCC (target: $8) vs -9.1% for GAIN (target: $15). For income investors, OFS offers the higher dividend yield at 30.51% vs MRCC's 0.24%.

MetricOFS logoOFSOFS Capital Corpo…MRCC logoMRCCMonroe Capital Co…GAIN logoGAINGladstone Investm…CSWC logoCSWCCapital Southwest…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.00$15.00$22.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts11710
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+30.5%+0.2%+10.0%+10.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1003
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.19$0.93$1.66$2.45
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — OFS and CSWC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

OFS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). GAIN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.

Best OverallOFS Capital Corporation (OFS)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OFS vs MRCC vs GAIN vs CSWC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OFS or MRCC or GAIN or CSWC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the stronger pick with 7.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -124. 6% for OFS Capital Corporation (OFS). Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (40. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OFS or MRCC or GAIN or CSWC?

On trailing P/E, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the cheapest at 9.

3x versus Capital Southwest Corporation at 16. 3x. On forward P/E, Capital Southwest Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OFS or MRCC or GAIN or CSWC?

Over the past 5 years, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) delivered a total return of +72.

0%, compared to -0. 9% for Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GAIN returned +319. 3% versus MRCC's +22. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OFS or MRCC or GAIN or CSWC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

53β versus OFS Capital Corporation's 0. 90β — meaning OFS is approximately 68% more volatile than GAIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 91% versus 177% for OFS Capital Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OFS or MRCC or GAIN or CSWC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is pulling ahead at 7.

7% versus -124. 6% for OFS Capital Corporation (OFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Monroe Capital Corporation grew EPS 17. 8% year-over-year, compared to -216. 5% for OFS Capital Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OFS or MRCC or GAIN or CSWC?

OFS Capital Corporation (OFS) is the more profitable company, earning 280.

2% net margin versus 43. 1% for Capital Southwest Corporation — meaning it keeps 280. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OFS leads at 280. 2% versus 48. 5% for CSWC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OFS leads at 239. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OFS or MRCC or GAIN or CSWC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) trades at 10.

1x forward P/E versus 40. 7x for Gladstone Investment Corporation — 30. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRCC: 57. 5% to $8. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OFS or MRCC or GAIN or CSWC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

OFS Capital Corporation (OFS) offers the highest yield at 30. 5%, versus 0. 2% for Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC).

09

Is OFS or MRCC or GAIN or CSWC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

53), 10. 0% yield, +319. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GAIN: +319. 3%, MRCC: +22. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OFS and MRCC and GAIN and CSWC?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OFS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MRCC is a small-cap deep-value stock; GAIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; CSWC is a small-cap deep-value stock. OFS, GAIN, CSWC pay a dividend while MRCC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OFS

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 168%
  • Dividend Yield > 12.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MRCC

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GAIN

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 43%
  • Dividend Yield > 4.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSWC

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform OFS and MRCC and GAIN and CSWC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(OFS: -124.6% · MRCC: -39.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(OFS: 280.2% · MRCC: 53.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.