Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OI vs CCK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
OI vs CCK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $1.39B | $11.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.40B | $12.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-186M | $737M |
| Gross Margin | 16.0% | 18.3% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 13.2% |
| Forward P/E | 7.0x | 12.5x |
| Total Debt | $5.00B | $6.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $759M | $879M |
OI vs CCK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| O-I Glass, Inc. (OI) | 100 | 118.7 | +18.7% |
| Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) | 100 | 154.5 | +54.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OI vs CCK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OI is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 12.5x)
CCK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth 4.8%, EPS growth 79.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.5%
- 98.1% 10Y total return vs OI's -50.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.8% revenue growth vs OI's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 12.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.0% margin vs OI's -2.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs OI's 1.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +4.9% vs OI's -30.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs OI's -2.0%, ROIC 14.1% vs 8.4% |
OI vs CCK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OI vs CCK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCK is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.4B annually — 1.9x OI's $6.4B. CCK is the more profitable business, keeping 6.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OI's -2.9%. On growth, CCK holds the edge at +7.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.4B | $12.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $2.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$186M | $737M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $474M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +18.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +13.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | +6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +8.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.7% | +7.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | -56.6% |
Valuation Metrics
OI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, OI's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CCK's 8.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $11.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.6B | $16.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.82x | 15.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.01x | 12.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.05x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.02x | 7.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.22x | 0.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 3.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.29x | 10.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CCK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CCK delivers a 21.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-11 for OI. CCK carries lower financial leverage with a 1.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OI's 3.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCK scores 7/9 vs OI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.4% | +21.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.0% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.4% | +14.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.46x | 1.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.2B | $5.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $759M | $879M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.0B | $6.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.84x | 4.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CCK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CCK five years ago would be worth $9,380 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,014 for OI. Over the past 12 months, CCK leads with a +4.9% total return vs OI's -30.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CCK at 7.3% vs OI's -25.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.0% | -2.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.9% | +4.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.7% | +23.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.9% | -6.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.2% | +98.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.0% | +7.3% |
Risk & Volatility
CCK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CCK is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OI's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CCK currently trades 86.7% from its 52-week high vs OI's 53.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.91 | $116.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.00 | $89.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.8% | +86.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.4 | 39.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 977K |
Analyst Outlook
CCK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OI as "Hold" and CCK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 91.4% upside for OI (target: $17) vs 19.2% for CCK (target: $121). CCK is the only dividend payer here at 1.03% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.40 | $120.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | +4.5% |
CCK leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
OI vs CCK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OI or CCK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Crown Holdings, Inc.
(CCK) is the stronger pick with 4. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for O-I Glass, Inc. (OI). Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OI or CCK?
On forward P/E, O-I Glass, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OI or CCK?
Over the past 5 years, Crown Holdings, Inc.
(CCK) delivered a total return of -6. 2%, compared to -49. 9% for O-I Glass, Inc. (OI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCK returned +98. 1% versus OI's -50. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OI or CCK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Crown Holdings, Inc.
(CCK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus O-I Glass, Inc. 's 1. 08β — meaning OI is approximately 124% more volatile than CCK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 177% versus 3% for O-I Glass, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OI or CCK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Crown Holdings, Inc.
(CCK) is pulling ahead at 4. 8% versus -1. 6% for O-I Glass, Inc. (OI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Crown Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 79. 7% year-over-year, compared to -21. 7% for O-I Glass, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CCK leads at -1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OI or CCK?
Crown Holdings, Inc.
(CCK) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus -2. 0% for O-I Glass, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCK leads at 13. 2% versus 9. 9% for OI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCK leads at 18. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OI or CCK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, O-I Glass, Inc.
(OI) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 5x for Crown Holdings, Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OI: 91. 4% to $17. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — OI or CCK?
In this comparison, CCK (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. OI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OI or CCK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Crown Holdings, Inc.
(CCK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48), 1. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCK: +98. 1%, OI: -50. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OI and CCK?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CCK is a mid-cap deep-value stock. CCK pays a dividend while OI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.