Medical - Pharmaceuticals
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ONC vs RCUS vs AGEN vs HALO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ONC vs RCUS vs AGEN vs HALO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Pharmaceuticals | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $33.87B | $2.50B | $132M | $7.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.74B | $236M | $114M | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $513M | $-369M | $115K | $317M |
| Gross Margin | 88.3% | 90.7% | 35.7% | 81.9% |
| Operating Margin | 12.0% | -168.6% | -17.7% | 58.4% |
| Forward P/E | 51.9x | — | 1.8x | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $2.00B | $99M | $10M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.55B | $222M | $3M | $134M |
ONC vs RCUS vs AGEN vs HALO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BeOne Medicines Ltd. (ONC) | 100 | 191.5 | +91.5% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 79.1 | -20.9% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 5.0 | -95.0% |
| Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO) | 100 | 268.6 | +168.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ONC vs RCUS vs AGEN vs HALO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ONC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 6.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 55.7%
- 10.5% 10Y total return vs HALO's 5.7%
- 40.2% revenue growth vs RCUS's -4.3%
RCUS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +209.6% vs HALO's -7.1%
AGEN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
HALO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.56
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 4.66x
- Beta 0.56, current ratio 4.66x
- 22.7% margin vs RCUS's -156.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% revenue growth vs RCUS's -4.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.7% margin vs RCUS's -156.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs AGEN's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +209.6% vs HALO's -7.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs RCUS's -35.3%, ROIC 73.4% vs -64.1% |
ONC vs RCUS vs AGEN vs HALO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ONC vs RCUS vs AGEN vs HALO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories
AGEN leads 1 • ONC leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HALO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ONC is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.7B annually — 50.3x AGEN's $114M. HALO is the more profitable business, keeping 22.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCUS's -156.4%. On growth, HALO holds the edge at +51.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.7B | $236M | $114M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $948M | -$391M | -$10M | $945M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $513M | -$369M | $115,000 | $317M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $846M | -$489M | -$159M | $645M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +88.3% | +90.7% | +35.7% | +81.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | -168.6% | -17.7% | +58.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | -156.4% | +0.1% | +22.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | -2.1% | -139.1% | +46.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.5% | -39.3% | +27.5% | +51.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2547.0% | +10.5% | +85.3% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.6x trailing earnings, ONC trades at a 62% valuation discount to HALO's 25.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HALO's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ONC's 53.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33.9B | $2.5B | $132M | $7.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31.3B | $2.4B | $140M | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.64x | -7.54x | -1102.94x | 25.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 51.91x | — | 1.79x | 8.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 53.20x | — | — | 8.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.34x | 10.11x | 1.16x | 5.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.25x | 4.22x | — | 165.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 35.97x | — | — | 11.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. RCUS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ONC's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ONC scores 7/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | -69.0% | — | +6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.7% | -35.3% | +0.1% | +12.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.6% | -64.1% | — | +73.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | -42.1% | — | +38.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.16x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.5B | -$123M | $7M | -$134M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.5B | $222M | $3M | $134M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $99M | $10M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.46x | -13.38x | 1.11x | 46.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HALO five years ago would be worth $13,704 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $611 for AGEN. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs HALO's -7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HALO at 29.1% vs AGEN's -51.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | +6.5% | +16.1% | -7.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.5% | +209.6% | +27.1% | -7.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.8% | +24.9% | -88.2% | +115.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.6% | -18.6% | -93.9% | +37.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1045.6% | +45.9% | -94.3% | +570.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.7% | +7.7% | -51.0% | +29.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RCUS and HALO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HALO is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCUS currently trades 86.3% from its 52-week high vs AGEN's 51.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 1.95x | 2.72x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $385.22 | $28.72 | $7.34 | $82.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $218.31 | $7.06 | $2.71 | $47.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.3% | +86.3% | +51.1% | +79.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.7 | 60.5 | 48.8 | 52.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 237K | 1.2M | 814K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ONC as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy", HALO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 95.5% upside for AGEN (target: $7) vs 20.2% for HALO (target: $78).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $401.29 | $30.00 | $7.33 | $78.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 18 | 11 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +4.5% |
HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AGEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ONC vs RCUS vs AGEN vs HALO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ONC or RCUS or AGEN or HALO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BeOne Medicines Ltd.
(ONC) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). BeOne Medicines Ltd. (ONC) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (51. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BeOne Medicines Ltd. (ONC) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ONC or RCUS or AGEN or HALO?
On trailing P/E, BeOne Medicines Ltd.
(ONC) is the cheapest at 9. 6x versus Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. at 25. 5x. On forward P/E, Agenus Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ONC or RCUS or AGEN or HALO?
Over the past 5 years, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) delivered a total return of +37. 0%, compared to -93. 9% for Agenus Inc. (AGEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ONC returned +1046% versus AGEN's -94. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ONC or RCUS or AGEN or HALO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AGEN is approximately 388% more volatile than HALO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 46% for BeOne Medicines Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ONC or RCUS or AGEN or HALO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BeOne Medicines Ltd.
(ONC) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BeOne Medicines Ltd. grew EPS 637. 4% year-over-year, compared to -25. 4% for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ONC leads at 55. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ONC or RCUS or AGEN or HALO?
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus -142. 9% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus -156. 3% for RCUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ONC or RCUS or AGEN or HALO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) trades at 1. 8x forward P/E versus 51. 9x for BeOne Medicines Ltd. — 50. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AGEN: 95. 5% to $7. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — ONC or RCUS or AGEN or HALO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ONC or RCUS or AGEN or HALO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BeOne Medicines Ltd.
(ONC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), +1046% 10Y return). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONC: +1046%, AGEN: -94. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ONC and RCUS and AGEN and HALO?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ONC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.