Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OPEN vs COMP vs Z vs HOUS vs RKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Internet Content & Information
Real Estate - Services
Financial - Mortgages
OPEN vs COMP vs Z vs HOUS vs RKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information | Real Estate - Services | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $4.08B | $5.32B | $10.57B | $1.98B | $39.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.94B | $8.31B | $2.69B | $5.87B | $6.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.39B | $14M | $61M | $-128M | $-68M |
| Gross Margin | 7.9% | 10.8% | 73.3% | 47.3% | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | -9.9% | -4.2% | 0.4% | 20.3% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 53.5x | 19.7x | — | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $193M | $454M | $536M | $3.06B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $962M | $199M | $773M | $118M | $2.70B |
OPEN vs COMP vs Z vs HOUS vs RKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 26.2 | -73.8% |
| Compass, Inc. (COMP) | 100 | 46.0 | -54.0% |
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (Z) | 100 | 33.6 | -66.4% |
| Anywhere Real Estat… (HOUS) | 100 | 81.9 | -18.1% |
| Rocket Companies, I… (RKT) | 100 | 62.9 | -37.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OPEN vs COMP vs Z vs HOUS vs RKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OPEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +5.1% vs Z's -35.7%
Among these 5 stocks, COMP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Z carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 118.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 11.0%, current ratio 3.13x
- 2.3% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
- Beta 1.32 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage
HOUS is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
RKT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.77
- -20.7% 10Y total return vs Z's 64.9%
- Beta 1.77, current ratio 16.62x
- 27.4% NII/revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.4% NII/revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.3% margin vs OPEN's -35.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.32 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs Z's -35.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC -0.5% vs -15.8% |
OPEN vs COMP vs Z vs HOUS vs RKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
OPEN vs COMP vs Z vs HOUS vs RKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
Z leads in 2 of 6 categories
RKT leads 2 • OPEN leads 0 • COMP leads 0 • HOUS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Z leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 3.1x Z's $2.7B. Z is the more profitable business, keeping 2.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.9B | $8.3B | $2.7B | $5.9B | $6.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$363M | -$100M | $221M | $1.4B | $639M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.4B | $14M | $61M | -$128M | -$68M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $16M | $433M | -$41M | -$4.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +10.8% | +73.3% | +47.3% | +91.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.9% | -4.2% | +0.4% | +20.3% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -35.2% | +0.2% | +2.3% | -2.2% | -1.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.2% | +0.2% | +16.1% | -0.7% | -58.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.6% | +99.4% | +18.4% | +5.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.0% | +133.3% | +5.1% | -2.9% | -89.6% |
Valuation Metrics
RKT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, HOUS's 18.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COMP's 66.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.1B | $5.3B | $10.6B | $2.0B | $39.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $5.6B | $10.3B | $4.9B | $37.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.13x | -87.50x | 482.65x | -15.34x | -282.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 53.52x | 19.71x | — | 19.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 66.86x | 39.58x | 18.77x | 41.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.93x | 0.76x | 4.09x | 0.35x | 5.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.06x | 6.36x | 2.27x | 1.25x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.93x | 26.18x | 44.97x | 76.08x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Z leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Z delivers a 1.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. Z carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOUS's 1.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), Z scores 7/9 vs RKT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -163.2% | +1.1% | +1.3% | -8.4% | -0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -53.6% | +0.4% | +1.1% | -2.2% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -15.8% | -2.5% | -0.5% | +1.0% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.7% | -2.9% | -0.6% | +1.4% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.58x | 0.11x | 1.95x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$769M | $255M | -$237M | $2.9B | -$2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $962M | $199M | $773M | $118M | $2.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $193M | $454M | $536M | $3.1B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.92x | -0.12x | 5.22x | 0.42x | 0.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — COMP and HOUS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HOUS five years ago would be worth $9,827 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,845 for OPEN. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs Z's -35.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COMP at 49.1% vs Z's -3.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.4% | -16.7% | -33.7% | +26.4% | -28.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +510.1% | +14.4% | -35.7% | +375.5% | +21.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +159.5% | +231.4% | -9.5% | +227.9% | +77.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.6% | -48.3% | -63.2% | -1.7% | -11.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.8% | -56.6% | +64.9% | -33.9% | -20.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.4% | +49.1% | -3.3% | +48.6% | +21.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — Z and HOUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Z is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOUS currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs Z's 46.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.09x | 1.79x | 1.32x | 1.86x | 1.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.87 | $13.96 | $93.88 | $18.03 | $24.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.51 | $5.66 | $39.05 | $3.10 | $11.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.9% | +62.7% | +46.5% | +97.8% | +58.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 65.7 | 51.1 | 77.6 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 36.3M | 14.5M | 3.6M | 11.5M | 25.0M |
Analyst Outlook
RKT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OPEN as "Hold", COMP as "Buy", Z as "Hold", HOUS as "Hold", RKT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 83.2% upside for Z (target: $80) vs 7.7% for HOUS (target: $19). HOUS is the only dividend payer here at 0.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.50 | $14.29 | $80.00 | $19.00 | $21.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 10 | 46 | 16 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +6.3% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
Z leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RKT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
OPEN vs COMP vs Z vs HOUS vs RKT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OPEN or COMP or Z or HOUS or RKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) is the stronger pick with 27. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) offers the better valuation at 482. 7x trailing P/E (19. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Compass, Inc. (COMP) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OPEN or COMP or Z or HOUS or RKT?
On forward P/E, Rocket Companies, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 19. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OPEN or COMP or Z or HOUS or RKT?
Over the past 5 years, Anywhere Real Estate Inc.
(HOUS) delivered a total return of -1. 7%, compared to -71. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: Z returned +64. 9% versus COMP's -56. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OPEN or COMP or Z or HOUS or RKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 32β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 135% more volatile than Z relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 195% for Anywhere Real Estate Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OPEN or COMP or Z or HOUS or RKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) is pulling ahead at 27. 4% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zillow Group, Inc. Class C grew EPS 118. 9% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, Z leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OPEN or COMP or Z or HOUS or RKT?
Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RKT leads at 8. 7% versus -6. 2% for OPEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RKT leads at 91. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OPEN or COMP or Z or HOUS or RKT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) trades at 19. 3x forward P/E versus 53. 5x for Compass, Inc. — 34. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for Z: 83. 2% to $80. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OPEN or COMP or Z or HOUS or RKT?
In this comparison, HOUS (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. OPEN, COMP, Z, RKT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OPEN or COMP or Z or HOUS or RKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (Z: +64. 9%, OPEN: -50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OPEN and COMP and Z and HOUS and RKT?
These companies operate in different sectors (OPEN (Real Estate) and COMP (Technology) and Z (Communication Services) and HOUS (Real Estate) and RKT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; Z is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HOUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RKT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 44%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.