Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OPRA vs MGNI vs PUBM vs TTD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
Software - Application
Software - Application
OPRA vs MGNI vs PUBM vs TTD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Advertising Agencies | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.68B | $2.01B | $485M | $11.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $648M | $723M | $282M | $2.97B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $115M | $159M | $-17M | $433M |
| Gross Margin | 58.5% | 63.4% | 63.2% | 77.8% |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | 14.8% | -7.3% | 20.3% |
| Forward P/E | 16.1x | 13.4x | — | 21.2x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $279M | $44M | $436M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $155M | $553M | $146M | $658M |
OPRA vs MGNI vs PUBM vs TTD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opera Limited (OPRA) | 100 | 205.5 | +105.5% |
| Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) | 100 | 45.6 | -54.4% |
| PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) | 100 | 36.6 | -63.4% |
| The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) | 100 | 29.3 | -70.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OPRA vs MGNI vs PUBM vs TTD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OPRA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 28.3%, EPS growth 32.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.0%
- 70.1% 10Y total return vs TTD's 6.8%
- 28.3% revenue growth vs PUBM's -2.9%
- 4.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
MGNI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Lower P/E (13.4x vs 21.2x)
- 22.0% margin vs PUBM's -6.2%
PUBM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TTD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.06
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 17.6%, current ratio 1.61x
- Beta 1.06, current ratio 1.61x
- Beta 1.06 vs MGNI's 1.63, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.3% revenue growth vs PUBM's -2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 21.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.0% margin vs PUBM's -6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs MGNI's 1.63, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.1% vs TTD's -58.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.4% ROA vs PUBM's -2.6%, ROIC 8.2% vs -6.8% |
OPRA vs MGNI vs PUBM vs TTD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
OPRA vs MGNI vs PUBM vs TTD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TTD leads in 1 of 6 categories
PUBM leads 1 • OPRA leads 1 • MGNI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTD is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 10.5x PUBM's $282M. MGNI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PUBM's -6.2%. On growth, OPRA holds the edge at +23.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $648M | $723M | $282M | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $120M | $145M | $11M | $693M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $115M | $159M | -$17M | $433M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $129M | $44M | $43M | $837M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.5% | +63.4% | +63.2% | +77.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +14.8% | -7.3% | +20.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +22.0% | -6.2% | +14.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +6.1% | +15.1% | +28.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.2% | +5.5% | -2.0% | +11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.0% | +142.9% | -35.0% | -20.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PUBM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, MGNI trades at a 43% valuation discount to TTD's 25.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGNI's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TTD's 15.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $2.0B | $485M | $11.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $1.7B | $384M | $11.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.76x | 14.74x | -33.03x | 25.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.06x | 13.45x | — | 21.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.78x | 11.43x | 14.47x | 15.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.72x | 2.81x | 1.72x | 3.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.69x | 2.33x | 1.83x | 4.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.58x | 12.11x | 7.28x | 14.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — OPRA and TTD each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PUBM. OPRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGNI's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OPRA scores 6/9 vs PUBM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.8% | +18.6% | -7.0% | +16.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.4% | +5.3% | -2.6% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.2% | +9.5% | -6.8% | +21.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.4% | +7.3% | -5.5% | +19.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.30x | 0.17x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$143M | -$275M | -$102M | -$222M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $155M | $553M | $146M | $658M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $279M | $44M | $436M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 222.21x | 4.03x | — | 1591.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OPRA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OPRA five years ago would be worth $21,077 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,295 for PUBM. Over the past 12 months, OPRA leads with a +15.1% total return vs TTD's -58.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPRA at 19.7% vs TTD's -28.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.5% | -12.8% | +19.2% | -37.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.1% | +12.6% | +2.0% | -58.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.3% | +58.7% | -18.5% | -63.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.8% | -60.9% | -77.1% | -64.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.1% | -4.7% | -65.2% | +680.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.7% | +16.7% | -6.6% | -28.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OPRA and TTD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTD is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGNI's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OPRA currently trades 89.1% from its 52-week high vs TTD's 25.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.57x | 1.63x | 1.51x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.06 | $26.65 | $13.88 | $91.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.71 | $10.82 | $6.21 | $19.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.1% | +52.5% | +73.8% | +25.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.6 | 55.4 | 66.5 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 623K | 2.1M | 746K | 20.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OPRA as "Buy", MGNI as "Buy", PUBM as "Buy", TTD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.0% upside for TTD (target: $37) vs 14.6% for OPRA (target: $22). OPRA is the only dividend payer here at 4.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.50 | $18.00 | $14.00 | $37.12 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 31 | 16 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.78 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.3% | +9.6% | +12.3% |
TTD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PUBM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
OPRA vs MGNI vs PUBM vs TTD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OPRA or MGNI or PUBM or TTD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Opera Limited (OPRA) is the stronger pick with 28.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Opera Limited (OPRA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OPRA or MGNI or PUBM or TTD?
On trailing P/E, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus The Trade Desk, Inc. at 25. 8x. On forward P/E, Magnite, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OPRA or MGNI or PUBM or TTD?
Over the past 5 years, Opera Limited (OPRA) delivered a total return of +110.
8%, compared to -77. 1% for PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTD returned +680. 4% versus PUBM's -65. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OPRA or MGNI or PUBM or TTD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 06β versus Magnite, Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning MGNI is approximately 53% more volatile than TTD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Opera Limited (OPRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 30% for Magnite, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OPRA or MGNI or PUBM or TTD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Opera Limited (OPRA) is pulling ahead at 28.
3% versus -2. 9% for PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to -234. 8% for PubMatic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OPRA leads at 23. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OPRA or MGNI or PUBM or TTD?
Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -5. 1% for PubMatic, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTD leads at 20. 3% versus -6. 1% for PUBM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTD leads at 78. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OPRA or MGNI or PUBM or TTD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 21. 2x for The Trade Desk, Inc. — 7. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTD: 58. 0% to $37. 12.
08Which pays a better dividend — OPRA or MGNI or PUBM or TTD?
In this comparison, OPRA (4.
2% yield) pays a dividend. MGNI, PUBM, TTD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OPRA or MGNI or PUBM or TTD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 06), +680. 4% 10Y return). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTD: +680. 4%, MGNI: -4. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OPRA and MGNI and PUBM and TTD?
These companies operate in different sectors (OPRA (Communication Services) and MGNI (Communication Services) and PUBM (Technology) and TTD (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OPRA is a small-cap high-growth stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock; PUBM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TTD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. OPRA pays a dividend while MGNI, PUBM, TTD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.