Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OPRT vs WRLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
OPRT vs WRLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $247M | $711M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $637M | $565M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $43M |
| Gross Margin | 63.7% | 70.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 28.1% |
| Forward P/E | 3.8x | 21.1x |
| Total Debt | $2.81B | $526M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $106M | $10M |
OPRT vs WRLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oportun Financial C… (OPRT) | 100 | 60.2 | -39.8% |
| World Acceptance Co… (WRLD) | 100 | 224.2 | +124.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OPRT vs WRLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OPRT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.5%, EPS growth 127.2%
- 19.5% NII/revenue growth vs WRLD's -1.5%
- Lower P/E (3.8x vs 21.1x)
WRLD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.27
- 254.6% 10Y total return vs OPRT's -65.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, current ratio 12.55x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.5% NII/revenue growth vs WRLD's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.8x vs 21.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs OPRT's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.27 vs OPRT's 2.07, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.4% vs OPRT's 0.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs OPRT's 0.6% |
OPRT vs WRLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WRLD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OPRT and WRLD operate at a comparable scale, with $637M and $565M in trailing revenue. WRLD is the more profitable business, keeping 15.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPRT's 4.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $637M | $565M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $85M | $61M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | $43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $401M | $252M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.7% | +70.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +28.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +15.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +61.0% | +44.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -64.7% | -107.8% |
Valuation Metrics
OPRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.7x trailing earnings, WRLD trades at a 17% valuation discount to OPRT's 10.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WRLD's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OPRT's 34.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $247M | $711M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.49x | 8.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.79x | 21.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 34.54x | 7.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.39x | 1.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.68x | 1.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.64x | 2.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WRLD leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WRLD delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $7 for OPRT. WRLD carries lower financial leverage with a 1.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OPRT's 7.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WRLD scores 9/9 vs OPRT's 8/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.7% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.0% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 7.21x | 1.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.7B | $516M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $106M | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.8B | $526M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.19x | 1.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — OPRT and WRLD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WRLD five years ago would be worth $10,611 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,825 for OPRT. Over the past 12 months, WRLD leads with a +5.4% total return vs OPRT's 0.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPRT at 11.4% vs WRLD's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.9% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | 0.0% | +5.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.3% | +29.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.7% | +6.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.6% | +254.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.4% | +8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
WRLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WRLD is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPRT's 2.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WRLD currently trades 76.1% from its 52-week high vs OPRT's 69.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.07x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.97 | $185.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.03 | $110.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.8% | +76.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.6 | 46.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 516K | 155K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OPRT as "Hold" and WRLD as "Hold".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.88 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.6% |
WRLD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OPRT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
OPRT vs WRLD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OPRT or WRLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Oportun Financial Corporation (OPRT) is the stronger pick with 19.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (21. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Oportun Financial Corporation (OPRT) a "Hold" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OPRT or WRLD?
On trailing P/E, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the cheapest at 8.
7x versus Oportun Financial Corporation at 10. 5x. On forward P/E, Oportun Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 3. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OPRT or WRLD?
Over the past 5 years, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) delivered a total return of +6.
1%, compared to -71. 7% for Oportun Financial Corporation (OPRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WRLD returned +255. 0% versus OPRT's -64. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OPRT or WRLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
27β versus Oportun Financial Corporation's 2. 07β — meaning OPRT is approximately 63% more volatile than WRLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 120% versus 7% for Oportun Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OPRT or WRLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Oportun Financial Corporation (OPRT) is pulling ahead at 19.
5% versus -1. 5% for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Oportun Financial Corporation grew EPS 127. 2% year-over-year, compared to 23. 6% for World Acceptance Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OPRT or WRLD?
World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
9% net margin versus 4. 0% for Oportun Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WRLD leads at 28. 1% versus 6. 9% for OPRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WRLD leads at 70. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OPRT or WRLD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Oportun Financial Corporation (OPRT) trades at 3.
8x forward P/E versus 21. 1x for World Acceptance Corporation — 17. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — OPRT or WRLD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is OPRT or WRLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
27), +255. 0% 10Y return). Oportun Financial Corporation (OPRT) carries a higher beta of 2. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WRLD: +255. 0%, OPRT: -64. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OPRT and WRLD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OPRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; WRLD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.