Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OPTU vs NFLX vs CMCSA vs CSCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Telecommunications Services
Communication Equipment
OPTU vs NFLX vs CMCSA vs CSCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Entertainment | Telecommunications Services | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $566M | $374.00B | $95.62B | $364.95B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.59B | $45.18B | $125.28B | $59.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.87B | $10.98B | $18.60B | $11.08B |
| Gross Margin | 69.3% | 48.5% | 61.7% | 64.4% |
| Operating Margin | -1.3% | 29.5% | 15.3% | 23.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.8x | 7.4x | 22.2x |
| Total Debt | $26.46B | $14.46B | $110.44B | $29.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.12B | $9.03B | $9.48B | $9.47B |
OPTU vs NFLX vs CMCSA vs CSCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optimum Communicati… (OPTU) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 66.3 | -33.7% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) | 100 | 192.7 | +92.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OPTU vs NFLX vs CMCSA vs CSCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OPTU lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs CSCO's 301.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- 15.9% revenue growth vs OPTU's -4.1%
CMCSA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
- PEG 0.40 vs NFLX's 0.75
- Beta 0.21, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.88x
- Lower P/E (7.4x vs 22.2x)
CSCO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +57.5% vs OPTU's -54.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs OPTU's -4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 22.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs OPTU's -21.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs OPTU's 1.52 | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs CSCO's 1.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.5% vs OPTU's -54.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs OPTU's -6.0%, ROIC 29.8% vs 5.0% |
OPTU vs NFLX vs CMCSA vs CSCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OPTU vs NFLX vs CMCSA vs CSCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories
CMCSA leads 2 • OPTU leads 0 • CSCO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.3B annually — 14.6x OPTU's $8.6B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPTU's -21.8%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.6B | $45.2B | $125.3B | $59.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.6B | $30.1B | $35.4B | $16.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.9B | $11.0B | $18.6B | $11.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$119M | $9.5B | $18.1B | $12.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.3% | +48.5% | +61.7% | +64.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | +29.5% | +15.3% | +23.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.8% | +24.3% | +14.8% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.4% | +20.9% | +14.5% | +21.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +17.6% | +5.3% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.0% | +31.1% | -32.6% | +29.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CMCSA leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 87% valuation discount to CSCO's 36.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CMCSA offers better value at 0.26x vs NFLX's 1.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $566M | $374.0B | $95.6B | $365.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25.9B | $379.4B | $196.6B | $385.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.30x | 34.89x | 4.87x | 36.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.80x | 7.44x | 22.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | 0.26x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.92x | 12.61x | 5.33x | 26.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 8.28x | 0.77x | 6.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 14.32x | 0.98x | 7.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.53x | 4.37x | 27.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $20 for CMCSA. NFLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMCSA's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSCO scores 8/9 vs OPTU's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +41.3% | +19.5% | +23.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.0% | +19.8% | +6.9% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +29.8% | +8.2% | +13.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | +30.5% | +8.9% | +13.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.54x | 1.13x | 0.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $25.3B | $5.4B | $101.0B | $20.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $9.0B | $9.5B | $9.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26.5B | $14.5B | $110.4B | $29.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.88x | 17.33x | 6.84x | 9.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NFLX and CSCO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSCO five years ago would be worth $18,718 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $326 for OPTU. Over the past 12 months, CSCO leads with a +57.5% total return vs OPTU's -54.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs OPTU's -26.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.7% | -3.0% | -8.9% | +22.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.3% | -23.6% | -19.9% | +57.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.7% | +166.5% | -26.4% | +109.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.7% | +75.2% | -45.2% | +87.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | +875.3% | +15.4% | +301.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.1% | +38.6% | -9.7% | +27.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CMCSA and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPTU's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSCO currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs OPTU's 40.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 0.39x | 0.21x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.98 | $134.12 | $36.66 | $94.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.14 | $75.01 | $25.75 | $59.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.6% | +65.8% | +71.6% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.5 | 35.3 | 37.8 | 63.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 44.0M | 28.4M | 18.9M |
Analyst Outlook
CMCSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OPTU as "Hold", NFLX as "Buy", CMCSA as "Buy", CSCO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 65.3% upside for OPTU (target: $2) vs 4.7% for CSCO (target: $97). For income investors, CMCSA offers the higher dividend yield at 5.13% vs CSCO's 1.75%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.00 | $116.29 | $31.87 | $96.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 99 | 60 | 73 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +5.1% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | 18 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.35 | $1.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +7.5% | +2.0% |
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CMCSA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
OPTU vs NFLX vs CMCSA vs CSCO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OPTU or NFLX or CMCSA or CSCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 1% for Optimum Communications, Inc. (OPTU). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OPTU or NFLX or CMCSA or CSCO?
On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus Cisco Systems, Inc. at 36. 1x. On forward P/E, Comcast Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Comcast Corporation wins at 0. 40x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OPTU or NFLX or CMCSA or CSCO?
Over the past 5 years, Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) delivered a total return of +87. 2%, compared to -96. 7% for Optimum Communications, Inc. (OPTU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus OPTU's -96. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OPTU or NFLX or CMCSA or CSCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
21β versus Optimum Communications, Inc. 's 1. 52β — meaning OPTU is approximately 624% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 113% for Comcast Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OPTU or NFLX or CMCSA or CSCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -4. 1% for Optimum Communications, Inc. (OPTU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Comcast Corporation grew EPS 30. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1718. 2% for Optimum Communications, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OPTU or NFLX or CMCSA or CSCO?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -21. 8% for Optimum Communications, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus 16. 7% for CMCSA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSCO leads at 64. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OPTU or NFLX or CMCSA or CSCO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 17. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPTU: 65. 3% to $2. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OPTU or NFLX or CMCSA or CSCO?
In this comparison, CMCSA (5.
1% yield), CSCO (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. OPTU, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OPTU or NFLX or CMCSA or CSCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
21), 5. 1% yield). Optimum Communications, Inc. (OPTU) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +15. 4%, OPTU: -96. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OPTU and NFLX and CMCSA and CSCO?
These companies operate in different sectors (OPTU (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and CMCSA (Communication Services) and CSCO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OPTU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. CMCSA, CSCO pay a dividend while OPTU, NFLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.