Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ORGO vs MDXG vs NAUT vs NVCR vs HOLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
ORGO vs MDXG vs NAUT vs NVCR vs HOLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $323M | $548M | $366M | $1.92B | $16.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $514M | $389M | $0.00 | $674M | $4.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-284K | $31M | $-57M | $-173M | $544M |
| Gross Margin | 69.3% | 81.0% | — | 75.2% | 52.8% |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | 10.2% | — | -27.2% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 16.7x | 295.2x | — | — | 17.2x |
| Total Debt | $133M | $23M | $30M | $290M | $2.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $94M | $166M | $12M | $103M | $1.96B |
ORGO vs MDXG vs NAUT vs NVCR vs HOLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organogenesis Holdi… (ORGO) | 100 | 58.3 | -41.7% |
| MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) | 100 | 54.3 | -45.7% |
| Nautilus Biotechnol… (NAUT) | 100 | 26.9 | -73.1% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 20.3 | -79.7% |
| Hologic, Inc. (HOLX) | 100 | 126.6 | +26.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ORGO vs MDXG vs NAUT vs NVCR vs HOLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ORGO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 17.0%, EPS growth 16.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.8%
- Lower P/E (16.7x vs 17.2x)
- 3.5% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
MDXG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 8.8%, current ratio 4.32x
- 20.0% revenue growth vs HOLX's 1.7%
- 9.7% ROA vs NAUT's -29.2%, ROIC 42.3% vs -26.0%
NAUT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +311.5% vs ORGO's -51.5%
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HOLX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.41
- 124.3% 10Y total return vs MDXG's -48.5%
- Beta 0.41, current ratio 3.75x
- 13.2% margin vs NVCR's -25.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs HOLX's 1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.7x vs 17.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.2% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +311.5% vs ORGO's -51.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.7% ROA vs NAUT's -29.2%, ROIC 42.3% vs -26.0% |
ORGO vs MDXG vs NAUT vs NVCR vs HOLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ORGO vs MDXG vs NAUT vs NVCR vs HOLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOLX leads in 2 of 6 categories
ORGO leads 1 • MDXG leads 1 • NAUT leads 1 • NVCR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOLX and NAUT operate at a comparable scale, with $4.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. HOLX is the more profitable business, keeping 13.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, NVCR holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $514M | $389M | $0 | $674M | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21M | $53M | -$58M | -$165M | $974M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$284,000 | $31M | -$57M | -$173M | $544M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $66M | -$51M | -$48M | $1000M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.3% | +81.0% | — | +75.2% | +52.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +10.2% | — | -27.2% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +7.9% | — | -25.7% | +13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +17.0% | — | -7.1% | +24.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -57.1% | -33.1% | — | +12.3% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -158.8% | -2.4% | +7.7% | -100.0% | -9.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ORGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, MDXG trades at a 62% valuation discount to HOLX's 30.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ORGO's 4.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HOLX's 17.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $323M | $548M | $366M | $1.9B | $17.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $362M | $405M | $384M | $2.1B | $17.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.74x | 11.53x | -6.13x | -13.80x | 30.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 295.20x | — | — | 17.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.35x | 5.14x | — | — | 17.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.57x | 1.31x | — | 2.92x | 4.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.75x | 2.15x | 2.32x | 5.51x | 3.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.51x | — | — | 18.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MDXG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MDXG delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. MDXG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOLX scores 7/9 vs NAUT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.1% | +12.9% | -35.0% | -50.8% | +11.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +9.7% | -29.2% | -16.5% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.0% | +42.3% | -26.0% | -16.4% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.3% | +25.7% | -32.0% | -28.9% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 0.09x | 0.19x | 0.85x | 0.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $39M | -$144M | $18M | $187M | $667M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $94M | $166M | $12M | $103M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $133M | $23M | $30M | $290M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 117.95x | 25.32x | — | -96.80x | 8.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NAUT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HOLX five years ago would be worth $11,582 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, NAUT leads with a +311.5% total return vs ORGO's -51.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NAUT at 6.6% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.8% | -43.1% | +50.8% | +28.3% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.5% | -47.1% | +311.5% | +1.1% | +37.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.8% | -36.6% | +21.0% | -75.7% | -8.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.1% | -62.9% | -71.3% | -91.3% | +15.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.2% | -48.5% | -72.4% | +30.3% | +124.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.3% | -14.1% | +6.6% | -37.6% | -2.9% |
Risk & Volatility
HOLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOLX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs ORGO's 35.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.92x | 1.22x | 1.82x | 2.20x | 0.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.08 | $7.99 | $4.31 | $20.06 | $76.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.21 | $3.02 | $0.62 | $9.82 | $52.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.5% | +46.2% | +66.8% | +83.9% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.9 | 49.3 | 52.5 | 69.8 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.4M | 315K | 1.5M | 10.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ORGO as "Buy", MDXG as "Buy", NAUT as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", HOLX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 258.4% upside for ORGO (target: $9) vs -13.2% for NAUT (target: $3). ORGO is the only dividend payer here at 3.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $10.00 | $2.50 | $33.50 | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 15 | 5 | 15 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.4% |
HOLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). ORGO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ORGO vs MDXG vs NAUT vs NVCR vs HOLX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ORGO or MDXG or NAUT or NVCR or HOLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (295. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Organogenesis Holdings Inc. (ORGO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ORGO or MDXG or NAUT or NVCR or HOLX?
On trailing P/E, MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Hologic, Inc. at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, Hologic, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ORGO or MDXG or NAUT or NVCR or HOLX?
Over the past 5 years, Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) delivered a total return of +15. 8%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HOLX returned +124. 3% versus ORGO's -74. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ORGO or MDXG or NAUT or NVCR or HOLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 437% more volatile than HOLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ORGO or MDXG or NAUT or NVCR or HOLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus 1. 7% for Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Organogenesis Holdings Inc. grew EPS 1600% year-over-year, compared to -25. 0% for Hologic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MDXG leads at 16. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ORGO or MDXG or NAUT or NVCR or HOLX?
Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 8% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 13. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOLX leads at 17. 4% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDXG leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ORGO or MDXG or NAUT or NVCR or HOLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) trades at 17. 2x forward P/E versus 295. 2x for MiMedx Group, Inc. — 278. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ORGO: 258. 4% to $9. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ORGO or MDXG or NAUT or NVCR or HOLX?
In this comparison, ORGO (3.
5% yield) pays a dividend. MDXG, NAUT, NVCR, HOLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ORGO or MDXG or NAUT or NVCR or HOLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), +124. 3% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOLX: +124. 3%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ORGO and MDXG and NAUT and NVCR and HOLX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ORGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; MDXG is a small-cap high-growth stock; NAUT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOLX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ORGO pays a dividend while MDXG, NAUT, NVCR, HOLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.