Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ORKA vs IMVT vs REGN vs DAWN vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
ORKA vs IMVT vs REGN vs DAWN vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $3.13B | $5.88B | $74.28B | $2.22B | $30.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $14.92B | $158M | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-109M | $-464M | $4.42B | $-107M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 84.5% | 89.1% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | 24.3% | -80.8% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 15.5x | — | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $968K | $98K | $2.71B | $3M | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $714M | $3.12B | $197M | $1.98B |
ORKA vs IMVT vs REGN vs DAWN vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oruka Therapeutics,… (ORKA) | 100 | 154.2 | +54.2% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 190.9 | +90.9% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 142.3 | +42.3% |
| Day One Biopharmace… (DAWN) | 100 | 90.5 | -9.5% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 74.4 | -25.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ORKA vs IMVT vs REGN vs DAWN vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ORKA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 8.4% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
- +5.6% vs IQV's +16.6%
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 190.9% 10Y total return vs REGN's 91.6%
REGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 29.6% margin vs DAWN's -67.8%
- 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 11.1% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1%
DAWN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 20.6%, EPS growth -2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 8.02x
- Beta 0.25, current ratio 8.02x
- Beta 0.25 vs ORKA's 1.50
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.32
- PEG 0.34 vs REGN's 2.44
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.4% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs DAWN's -67.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs ORKA's 1.50 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.6% vs IQV's +16.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1% |
ORKA vs IMVT vs REGN vs DAWN vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ORKA vs IMVT vs REGN vs DAWN vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IQV leads in 2 of 6 categories
REGN leads 1 • ORKA leads 1 • DAWN leads 1 • IMVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — REGN and DAWN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DAWN's -67.8%. On growth, DAWN holds the edge at +83.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $14.9B | $158M | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$126M | -$487M | $4.2B | -$124M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$109M | -$464M | $4.4B | -$107M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$85M | -$423M | $4.2B | -$108M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +84.5% | +89.1% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | +24.3% | -80.8% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | +29.6% | -67.8% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | +27.9% | -68.0% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +19.0% | +83.9% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.9% | +19.7% | -7.2% | +70.0% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.2x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 24% valuation discount to IQV's 22.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.56x vs REGN's 2.72x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $5.9B | $74.3B | $2.2B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $5.2B | $73.9B | $2.0B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.94x | -10.60x | 17.23x | -20.70x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 15.46x | — | 13.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.72x | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.92x | — | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 5.18x | 14.06x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.84x | 6.20x | 2.48x | 5.05x | 4.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 18.20x | — | 14.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
REGN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-47 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REGN scores 5/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.7% | -47.1% | +14.3% | -23.4% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.6% | -44.1% | +11.1% | -20.7% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -41.2% | — | +8.9% | -30.5% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.5% | -66.1% | +10.2% | -26.7% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.00x | 0.09x | 0.01x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$61M | -$714M | -$412M | -$194M | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $714M | $3.1B | $197M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $968,000 | $98,000 | $2.7B | $3M | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -60.03x | — | 108.44x | — | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ORKA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORKA five years ago would be worth $22,861 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,720 for IQV. Over the past 12 months, ORKA leads with a +562.5% total return vs IQV's +16.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ORKA at 50.3% vs IQV's -2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +128.5% | +11.7% | -7.8% | +143.3% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +562.5% | +102.4% | +31.2% | +218.5% | +16.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +239.6% | +49.8% | -4.4% | +65.1% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.6% | +84.4% | +43.2% | -8.4% | -22.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.0% | +190.9% | +91.6% | -8.4% | +166.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +50.3% | +14.4% | -1.5% | +18.2% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
DAWN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DAWN is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ORKA's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAWN currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs ORKA's 71.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.50x | 1.36x | 0.77x | 0.25x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $91.00 | $30.09 | $821.11 | $21.53 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.91 | $13.36 | $476.49 | $5.64 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.0% | +96.2% | +87.1% | +100.0% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.6 | 50.6 | 41.7 | 80.3 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.4M | 626K | 5.0M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ORKA as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", DAWN as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 111.1% upside for ORKA (target: $136) vs -0.1% for DAWN (target: $22). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $136.38 | $45.50 | $865.68 | $21.50 | $223.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 23 | 48 | 12 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.41 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.3% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
IQV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). REGN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
ORKA vs IMVT vs REGN vs DAWN vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ORKA or IMVT or REGN or DAWN or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the stronger pick with 20. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 2x trailing P/E (15. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Oruka Therapeutics, Inc. (ORKA) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ORKA or IMVT or REGN or DAWN or IQV?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 17. 2x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 34x versus Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 44x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ORKA or IMVT or REGN or DAWN or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, Oruka Therapeutics, Inc.
(ORKA) delivered a total return of +128. 6%, compared to -22. 8% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +190. 9% versus ORKA's -89. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ORKA or IMVT or REGN or DAWN or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 25β versus Oruka Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning ORKA is approximately 492% more volatile than DAWN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ORKA or IMVT or REGN or DAWN or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is pulling ahead at 20. 6% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Oruka Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 39. 7% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REGN leads at 5. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ORKA or IMVT or REGN or DAWN or IQV?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -67. 8% for Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REGN leads at 24. 9% versus -80. 8% for DAWN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DAWN leads at 89. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ORKA or IMVT or REGN or DAWN or IQV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 34x versus Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 44x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 15. 5x for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ORKA: 111. 1% to $136. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — ORKA or IMVT or REGN or DAWN or IQV?
In this comparison, REGN (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. ORKA, IMVT, DAWN, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ORKA or IMVT or REGN or DAWN or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 25)). Oruka Therapeutics, Inc. (ORKA) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DAWN: -8. 4%, ORKA: -89. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ORKA and IMVT and REGN and DAWN and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ORKA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; DAWN is a small-cap high-growth stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.