Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ORN vs MYRG vs PWR vs GLDD vs PRIM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
ORN vs MYRG vs PWR vs GLDD vs PRIM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $599M | $6.82B | $111.76B | $1.14B | $5.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $880M | $3.82B | $29.99B | $888M | $7.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $142M | $1.12B | $73M | $248M |
| Gross Margin | 12.3% | 11.9% | 13.6% | 22.9% | 10.4% |
| Operating Margin | 1.4% | 5.1% | 5.8% | 14.1% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 37.8x | 40.3x | 53.5x | 15.4x | 20.2x |
| Total Debt | $44M | $104M | $1.19B | $458M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $150M | $440M | $13M | $541M |
ORN vs MYRG vs PWR vs GLDD vs PRIM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orion Group Holding… (ORN) | 100 | 566.5 | +466.5% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 1519.8 | +1419.8% |
| Quanta Services, In… (PWR) | 100 | 2016.8 | +1916.8% |
| Great Lakes Dredge … (GLDD) | 100 | 183.4 | +83.4% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 627.9 | +527.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ORN vs MYRG vs PWR vs GLDD vs PRIM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ORN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MYRG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +182.4% vs PRIM's +53.5%
- 8.7% ROA vs ORN's 2.0%, ROIC 18.3% vs 4.4%
PWR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.32, yield 0.1%
- 31.2% 10Y total return vs MYRG's 17.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 1.14x
- 19.8% revenue growth vs ORN's 7.0%
GLDD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (15.4x vs 53.5x)
- 8.3% margin vs ORN's 1.0%
- Beta 0.92 vs ORN's 1.88
PRIM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 51.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.7%
- PEG 1.10 vs GLDD's 9.93
- Beta 1.37, yield 0.3%, current ratio 1.26x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.8% revenue growth vs ORN's 7.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.4x vs 53.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs ORN's 1.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs ORN's 1.88 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs PRIM's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +182.4% vs PRIM's +53.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.7% ROA vs ORN's 2.0%, ROIC 18.3% vs 4.4% |
ORN vs MYRG vs PWR vs GLDD vs PRIM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ORN vs MYRG vs PWR vs GLDD vs PRIM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GLDD leads in 3 of 6 categories
MYRG leads 1 • ORN leads 0 • PWR leads 0 • PRIM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLDD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.0B annually — 34.1x ORN's $880M. GLDD is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ORN's 1.0%. On growth, GLDD holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $880M | $3.8B | $30.0B | $888M | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $38M | $261M | $2.4B | $169M | $437M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $142M | $1.1B | $73M | $248M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $231M | $1.7B | $99M | $165M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +11.9% | +13.6% | +22.9% | +10.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +14.1% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +3.7% | +3.7% | +8.3% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +6.0% | +5.6% | +11.2% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.7% | +20.0% | +26.3% | +26.5% | -5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | +106.2% | +51.0% | -34.5% | -60.5% |
Valuation Metrics
GLDD leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, GLDD trades at a 93% valuation discount to ORN's 237.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PRIM offers better value at 1.14x vs GLDD's 10.15x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $599M | $6.8B | $111.8B | $1.1B | $5.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $642M | $6.8B | $112.5B | $1.6B | $6.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 237.26x | 58.15x | 109.53x | 15.74x | 20.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.82x | 40.31x | 53.49x | 15.40x | 20.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.48x | 6.35x | 10.15x | 1.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.04x | 29.55x | 45.32x | 9.34x | 12.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.70x | 1.86x | 3.94x | 1.28x | 0.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.71x | 10.43x | 12.51x | 2.23x | 3.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.36x | 68.95x | 11.41x | 16.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $5 for ORN. PWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLDD's 0.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MYRG scores 8/9 vs PWR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.4% | +22.1% | +13.0% | +14.8% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +8.7% | +4.8% | +5.8% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +18.3% | +11.8% | +9.7% | +13.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +19.4% | +11.3% | +11.4% | +16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.16x | 0.13x | 0.89x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $43M | -$47M | $748M | $445M | $735M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $150M | $440M | $13M | $541M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $44M | $104M | $1.2B | $458M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.64x | 39.49x | 6.27x | 3.32x | 21.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ORN and MYRG and PWR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PWR five years ago would be worth $74,205 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,257 for GLDD. Over the past 12 months, MYRG leads with a +182.4% total return vs PRIM's +53.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ORN at 80.1% vs GLDD's 42.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.1% | +93.1% | +69.4% | +28.2% | -19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +93.0% | +182.4% | +128.4% | +60.7% | +53.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +484.3% | +227.6% | +341.7% | +190.6% | +333.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +162.3% | +441.6% | +642.0% | +22.6% | +229.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.6% | +1724.4% | +3118.4% | +276.9% | +387.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +80.1% | +48.5% | +64.1% | +42.7% | +63.0% |
Risk & Volatility
GLDD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLDD is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ORN's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GLDD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs PRIM's 51.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 1.65x | 1.32x | 0.92x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.81 | $475.39 | $788.72 | $17.02 | $205.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.44 | $152.93 | $320.56 | $9.96 | $67.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.2% | +92.1% | +94.4% | +99.9% | +51.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.5 | 69.1 | 73.6 | 68.5 | 33.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 359K | 297K | 1.1M | 1.9M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PWR and PRIM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ORN as "Buy", MYRG as "Hold", PWR as "Buy", GLDD as "Buy", PRIM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.1% upside for PRIM (target: $165) vs -10.7% for PWR (target: $665). PRIM is the only dividend payer here at 0.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $412.67 | $665.29 | — | $164.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 21 | 35 | 7 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.1% | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.40 | — | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | +0.1% | +1.0% | +0.2% |
GLDD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MYRG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
ORN vs MYRG vs PWR vs GLDD vs PRIM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ORN or MYRG or PWR or GLDD or PRIM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) is the stronger pick with 19. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 0% for Orion Group Holdings, Inc. (ORN). Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (15. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Orion Group Holdings, Inc. (ORN) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ORN or MYRG or PWR or GLDD or PRIM?
On trailing P/E, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) is the cheapest at 15.
7x versus Orion Group Holdings, Inc. at 237. 3x. On forward P/E, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primoris Services Corporation wins at 1. 10x versus Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation's 9. 93x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ORN or MYRG or PWR or GLDD or PRIM?
Over the past 5 years, Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) delivered a total return of +642. 0%, compared to +22. 6% for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PWR returned +31. 2% versus ORN's +198. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ORN or MYRG or PWR or GLDD or PRIM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
92β versus Orion Group Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 88β — meaning ORN is approximately 104% more volatile than GLDD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 89% for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ORN or MYRG or PWR or GLDD or PRIM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) is pulling ahead at 19. 8% versus 7. 0% for Orion Group Holdings, Inc. (ORN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to 12. 8% for Quanta Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRIM leads at 19. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ORN or MYRG or PWR or GLDD or PRIM?
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
3% net margin versus 0. 3% for Orion Group Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLDD leads at 14. 1% versus 1. 4% for ORN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GLDD leads at 22. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ORN or MYRG or PWR or GLDD or PRIM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 10x versus Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation's 9. 93x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) trades at 15. 4x forward P/E versus 53. 5x for Quanta Services, Inc. — 38. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRIM: 57. 1% to $164. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — ORN or MYRG or PWR or GLDD or PRIM?
In this comparison, PRIM (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. ORN, MYRG, PWR, GLDD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ORN or MYRG or PWR or GLDD or PRIM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1724% 10Y return). Orion Group Holdings, Inc. (ORN) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MYRG: +1724%, ORN: +198. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ORN and MYRG and PWR and GLDD and PRIM?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ORN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GLDD is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.