Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OSBC vs MOFG vs FBIZ vs IROQ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
OSBC vs MOFG vs FBIZ vs IROQ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $1.02B | $473M | $89M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $397M | $206M | $279M | $48M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $80M | $58M | $51M | $5M |
| Gross Margin | 78.1% | 29.4% | 57.3% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 27.9% | -40.8% | 21.6% | 12.2% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 13.8x | 9.1x | 19.4x |
| Total Debt | $339M | $117M | $259M | $73M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $124M | $205M | $31M | $20M |
OSBC vs MOFG vs FBIZ vs IROQ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Old Second Bancorp,… (OSBC) | 100 | 273.8 | +173.8% |
| MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG) | 100 | 241.4 | +141.4% |
| First Business Fina… (FBIZ) | 100 | 342.7 | +242.7% |
| IF Bancorp, Inc. (IROQ) | 100 | 173.5 | +73.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OSBC vs MOFG vs FBIZ vs IROQ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OSBC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 4.2% vs IROQ's 2.3%
- 18.1% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1%
MOFG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +77.6% vs IROQ's +10.9%
FBIZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 2.1%
- 161.7% 10Y total return vs OSBC's 219.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 69.8%, current ratio 0.31x
- PEG 0.36 vs OSBC's 0.81
IROQ is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.6%, EPS growth 140.4%
- Beta 0.04 vs MOFG's 1.29
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.1% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 13.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs MOFG's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs OSBC's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.6% vs IROQ's +10.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MOFG's 0.7% |
OSBC vs MOFG vs FBIZ vs IROQ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
OSBC vs MOFG vs FBIZ vs IROQ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OSBC leads in 2 of 6 categories
FBIZ leads 2 • MOFG leads 1 • IROQ leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OSBC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OSBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $397M annually — 8.2x IROQ's $48M. OSBC is the more profitable business, keeping 20.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOFG's -29.3%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $397M | $206M | $279M | $48M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $121M | $74M | $49M | $7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $80M | $58M | $51M | $5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $119M | $79M | $53M | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.1% | +29.4% | +57.3% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | -40.8% | +21.6% | +12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | -29.3% | +18.0% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +29.5% | +21.9% | +13.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.6% | +113.6% | +12.9% | +115.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FBIZ leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, FBIZ trades at a 52% valuation discount to IROQ's 19.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBIZ offers better value at 0.37x vs OSBC's 1.09x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $1.0B | $473M | $89M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $929M | $702M | $142M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.01x | -13.93x | 9.36x | 19.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.71x | 13.77x | 9.15x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.09x | — | 0.37x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.97x | — | 11.61x | 21.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.80x | 4.94x | 1.69x | 1.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 1.50x | 1.25x | 1.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.43x | 16.74x | 7.74x | 13.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OSBC leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBIZ delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $6 for IROQ. MOFG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IROQ's 0.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBIZ scores 8/9 vs OSBC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.1% | +10.0% | +14.1% | +6.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +0.9% | +1.2% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | -9.4% | +7.0% | +2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | -9.5% | +2.6% | +3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.21x | 0.70x | 0.89x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $215M | -$88M | $229M | $53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $124M | $205M | $31M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $339M | $117M | $259M | $73M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.78x | 0.67x | 0.42x | 0.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOFG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBIZ five years ago would be worth $23,086 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,561 for IROQ. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +77.6% total return vs IROQ's +10.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOFG at 39.0% vs IROQ's 22.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.9% | +30.2% | +7.1% | -1.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.5% | +77.6% | +21.0% | +10.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.4% | +168.6% | +136.5% | +82.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.8% | +72.2% | +130.9% | +25.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +219.4% | +109.8% | +161.7% | +59.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.2% | +39.0% | +33.2% | +22.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MOFG and IROQ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IROQ is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOFG currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs IROQ's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 1.29x | 0.81x | 0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.43 | $49.69 | $60.54 | $29.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.21 | $26.52 | $45.90 | $23.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.0% | +99.2% | +93.7% | +91.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.6 | 74.9 | 49.1 | 34.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 400K | 0 | 39K | 44K |
Analyst Outlook
FBIZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OSBC as "Buy", MOFG as "Buy", FBIZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.1% upside for FBIZ (target: $67) vs -36.6% for MOFG (target: $31). For income investors, FBIZ offers the higher dividend yield at 2.09% vs OSBC's 1.09%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.67 | $31.25 | $67.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 8 | 10 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +2.0% | +2.1% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 5 | 13 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.23 | $0.97 | $1.19 | $0.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
OSBC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBIZ leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
OSBC vs MOFG vs FBIZ vs IROQ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OSBC or MOFG or FBIZ or IROQ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Old Second Bancorp, Inc.
(OSBC) is the stronger pick with 18. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OSBC or MOFG or FBIZ or IROQ?
On trailing P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus IF Bancorp, Inc. at 19. 4x. On forward P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Business Financial Services, Inc. wins at 0. 36x versus Old Second Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OSBC or MOFG or FBIZ or IROQ?
Over the past 5 years, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) delivered a total return of +130. 9%, compared to +25. 6% for IF Bancorp, Inc. (IROQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OSBC returned +219. 4% versus IROQ's +59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OSBC or MOFG or FBIZ or IROQ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IF Bancorp, Inc.
(IROQ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 04β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning MOFG is approximately 3578% more volatile than IROQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 89% for IF Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OSBC or MOFG or FBIZ or IROQ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Old Second Bancorp, Inc.
(OSBC) is pulling ahead at 18. 1% versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IF Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 140. 4% year-over-year, compared to -366. 2% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OSBC or MOFG or FBIZ or IROQ?
Old Second Bancorp, Inc.
(OSBC) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 2% net margin versus -29. 3% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OSBC leads at 27. 9% versus -40. 8% for MOFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OSBC leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OSBC or MOFG or FBIZ or IROQ more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus Old Second Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 13. 8x for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIZ: 18. 1% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OSBC or MOFG or FBIZ or IROQ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 1. 1% for Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC).
09Is OSBC or MOFG or FBIZ or IROQ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IF Bancorp, Inc.
(IROQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 04), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IROQ: +59. 5%, MOFG: +109. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OSBC and MOFG and FBIZ and IROQ?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OSBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MOFG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FBIZ is a small-cap deep-value stock; IROQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.