Medical - Healthcare Plans
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OSCR vs ACGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Diversified
OSCR vs ACGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Insurance - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $4.71B | $33.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.70B | $19.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-443M | $4.40B |
| Gross Margin | 77.6% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | -3.5% | 25.0% |
| Forward P/E | 29.8x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $430M | $2.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.77B | $993M |
OSCR vs ACGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) | 100 | 66.7 | -33.3% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 245.3 | +145.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OSCR vs ACGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OSCR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.5%, EPS growth -18.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 41.6%
- 27.5% revenue growth vs ACGL's 14.3%
- +38.0% vs ACGL's +1.7%
ACGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.02, yield 0.0%
- 320.6% 10Y total return vs OSCR's -48.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.5% revenue growth vs ACGL's 14.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 29.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.8 vs OSCR's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs OSCR's 1.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.0% vs ACGL's +1.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs OSCR's -7.0% |
OSCR vs ACGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OSCR vs ACGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.9B annually — 1.7x OSCR's $11.7B. ACGL is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OSCR's -3.8%. On growth, OSCR holds the edge at +17.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.7B | $19.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$379M | $5.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$443M | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $6.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.6% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +25.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +30.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.2% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +39.0% |
Valuation Metrics
OSCR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $33.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $35.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.62x | 8.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.79x | 10.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.28x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.40x | 1.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.80x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.45x | 5.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACGL leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACGL delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-45 for OSCR. ACGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OSCR's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACGL scores 7/9 vs OSCR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -45.2% | +19.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.0% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.3% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.3B | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.8B | $993M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $430M | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -23.85x | 34.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OSCR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $24,668 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,598 for OSCR. Over the past 12 months, OSCR leads with a +38.0% total return vs ACGL's +1.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OSCR at 35.8% vs ACGL's 9.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.8% | +0.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.0% | +1.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +150.2% | +32.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.0% | +146.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.4% | +320.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.8% | +9.8% |
Risk & Volatility
ACGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OSCR's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACGL currently trades 91.1% from its 52-week high vs OSCR's 75.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.80 | $103.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.69 | $82.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.4% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 79.7 | 42.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.2M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OSCR as "Hold" and ACGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.5% upside for ACGL (target: $104) vs -6.6% for OSCR (target: $17).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.75 | $104.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.6% |
ACGL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OSCR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
OSCR vs ACGL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OSCR or ACGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Oscar Health, Inc.
(OSCR) is the stronger pick with 27. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 3% for Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL). Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OSCR or ACGL?
On forward P/E, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
is actually cheaper at 10. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OSCR or ACGL?
Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) delivered a total return of +146. 7%, compared to -24. 0% for Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACGL returned +320. 6% versus OSCR's -48. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OSCR or ACGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus Oscar Health, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning OSCR is approximately 11909% more volatile than ACGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 44% for Oscar Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OSCR or ACGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Oscar Health, Inc.
(OSCR) is pulling ahead at 27. 5% versus 14. 3% for Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arch Capital Group Ltd. grew EPS 3. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1865. 9% for Oscar Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OSCR leads at 41. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OSCR or ACGL?
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus -3. 8% for Oscar Health, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACGL leads at 25. 0% versus -3. 4% for OSCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACGL leads at 37. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OSCR or ACGL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 29. 8x for Oscar Health, Inc. — 19. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACGL: 10. 5% to $104. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OSCR or ACGL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is OSCR or ACGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 02), +320. 6% 10Y return). Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACGL: +320. 6%, OSCR: -48. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OSCR and ACGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (OSCR (Healthcare) and ACGL (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OSCR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.