Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OTLY vs SMPL vs NOMD vs BYND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
OTLY vs SMPL vs NOMD vs BYND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $336M | $1.24B | $1.44B | $414M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $893M | $1.45B | $3.03B | $265M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-152M | $91M | $137M | $244M |
| Gross Margin | 32.6% | 34.0% | 27.1% | 3.5% |
| Operating Margin | -6.8% | 14.4% | 10.7% | -82.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.5x | 6.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $514M | $304M | $2.29B | $508M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $64M | $98M | $325M | $208M |
OTLY vs SMPL vs NOMD vs BYND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oatly Group AB (OTLY) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 36.0 | -64.0% |
| Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) | 100 | 33.0 | -67.0% |
| Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OTLY vs SMPL vs NOMD vs BYND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OTLY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +0.2% vs BYND's -64.9%
SMPL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth -26.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
- 9.0% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6%
NOMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 7.1%
- 40.1% 10Y total return vs SMPL's 3.7%
- Beta 0.07, yield 7.1%, current ratio 1.07x
- Better valuation composite
BYND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 92.2% margin vs OTLY's -17.1%
- 39.3% ROA vs OTLY's -19.5%, ROIC -44.4% vs -10.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.0% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 92.2% margin vs OTLY's -17.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs BYND's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +0.2% vs BYND's -64.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.3% ROA vs OTLY's -19.5%, ROIC -44.4% vs -10.5% |
OTLY vs SMPL vs NOMD vs BYND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
OTLY vs SMPL vs NOMD vs BYND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SMPL leads in 2 of 6 categories
NOMD leads 2 • OTLY leads 0 • BYND leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NOMD is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 11.4x BYND's $265M. BYND is the more profitable business, keeping 92.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OTLY's -17.1%. On growth, OTLY holds the edge at +15.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $893M | $1.4B | $3.0B | $265M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | $231M | $435M | -$187M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$152M | $91M | $137M | $244M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$28M | $174M | $252M | -$134M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +34.0% | +27.1% | +3.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | +14.4% | +10.7% | -82.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.1% | +6.3% | +4.5% | +92.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +12.0% | +8.3% | -50.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.6% | -0.3% | -2.6% | -15.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.8% | -31.6% | -123.1% | +90.9% |
Valuation Metrics
NOMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, NOMD trades at a 22% valuation discount to SMPL's 12.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SMPL's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NOMD's 7.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $336M | $1.2B | $1.4B | $414M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $786M | $1.4B | $3.7B | $714M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.14x | 12.20x | 9.46x | -0.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.45x | 6.86x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.51x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.97x | 7.34x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.39x | 0.86x | 0.40x | 1.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.63x | 0.70x | 0.52x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.86x | 4.85x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NOMD delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-4 for OTLY. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OTLY's 26.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SMPL scores 5/9 vs BYND's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.3% | +5.2% | +5.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.5% | +3.7% | +2.2% | +39.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.5% | +8.1% | +5.5% | -44.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -27.2% | +9.4% | +6.2% | -40.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 26.12x | 0.17x | 0.92x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $449M | $206M | $2.0B | $300M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $64M | $98M | $325M | $208M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $514M | $304M | $2.3B | $508M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.41x | 6.77x | 2.52x | -11.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NOMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NOMD five years ago would be worth $4,026 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $81 for BYND. Over the past 12 months, OTLY leads with a +0.2% total return vs BYND's -64.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NOMD at -15.8% vs BYND's -59.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.8% | -36.4% | -15.4% | +1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.2% | -64.8% | -43.5% | -64.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.0% | -67.8% | -40.3% | -93.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | -64.3% | -59.7% | -99.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | +3.7% | +40.1% | -98.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -37.0% | -31.5% | -15.8% | -59.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OTLY and NOMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NOMD is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BYND's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OTLY currently trades 57.2% from its 52-week high vs BYND's 11.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 0.38x | 0.07x | 1.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.84 | $36.92 | $19.71 | $7.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.26 | $10.21 | $9.17 | $0.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.2% | +33.7% | +51.3% | +11.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.7 | 42.9 | 58.6 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 64K | 2.8M | 1.6M | 59.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OTLY as "Hold", SMPL as "Buy", NOMD as "Buy", BYND as "Sell". Consensus price targets imply 4889.9% upside for BYND (target: $45) vs 33.4% for NOMD (target: $14). NOMD is the only dividend payer here at 7.06% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.64 | $20.17 | $13.50 | $44.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 24 | 13 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +7.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.61 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.1% | +16.5% | 0.0% |
SMPL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NOMD leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
OTLY vs SMPL vs NOMD vs BYND: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OTLY or SMPL or NOMD or BYND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger pick with 9.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OTLY or SMPL or NOMD or BYND?
On trailing P/E, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus The Simply Good Foods Company at 12. 2x. On forward P/E, Nomad Foods Limited is actually cheaper at 6. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OTLY or SMPL or NOMD or BYND?
Over the past 5 years, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) delivered a total return of -59.
7%, compared to -99. 2% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NOMD returned +40. 1% versus BYND's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OTLY or SMPL or NOMD or BYND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
07β versus Beyond Meat, Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning BYND is approximately 2249% more volatile than NOMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 26% for Oatly Group AB — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OTLY or SMPL or NOMD or BYND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is pulling ahead at 9.
0% versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Oatly Group AB grew EPS 25. 5% year-over-year, compared to -35. 0% for Nomad Foods Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMPL leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OTLY or SMPL or NOMD or BYND?
Beyond Meat, Inc.
(BYND) is the more profitable company, earning 79. 8% net margin versus -17. 7% for Oatly Group AB — meaning it keeps 79. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -84. 7% for BYND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMPL leads at 35. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OTLY or SMPL or NOMD or BYND more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) trades at 6.
9x forward P/E versus 7. 5x for The Simply Good Foods Company — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BYND: 4889. 9% to $44. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — OTLY or SMPL or NOMD or BYND?
In this comparison, NOMD (7.
1% yield) pays a dividend. OTLY, SMPL, BYND do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OTLY or SMPL or NOMD or BYND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
07), 7. 1% yield). Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NOMD: +40. 1%, BYND: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OTLY and SMPL and NOMD and BYND?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OTLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; NOMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; BYND is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NOMD pays a dividend while OTLY, SMPL, BYND do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.