REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OUT vs CCO vs LAMR vs NXST vs GTN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
REIT - Specialty
Entertainment
Broadcasting
OUT vs CCO vs LAMR vs NXST vs GTN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | Advertising Agencies | REIT - Specialty | Entertainment | Broadcasting |
| Market Cap | $5.78B | $1.21B | $15.35B | $5.89B | $412M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.87B | $1.64B | $2.29B | $5.11B | $3.08B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $187M | $-205M | $550M | $165M | $-76M |
| Gross Margin | 46.2% | 39.3% | 23.6% | 32.3% | 115.0% |
| Operating Margin | 17.5% | 18.9% | 28.5% | 17.8% | 12.4% |
| Forward P/E | 26.5x | — | 26.6x | 7.9x | 1.8x |
| Total Debt | $4.13B | $6.47B | $6.18B | $6.86B | $5.81B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $100M | $190M | $65M | $280M | $368M |
OUT vs CCO vs LAMR vs NXST vs GTN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outfront Media Inc. (OUT) | 100 | 233.8 | +133.8% |
| Clear Channel Outdo… (CCO) | 100 | 246.4 | +146.4% |
| Lamar Advertising C… (LAMR) | 100 | 228.0 | +128.0% |
| Nexstar Media Group… (NXST) | 100 | 233.2 | +133.2% |
| Gray Media, Inc. (GTN) | 100 | 31.8 | -68.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OUT vs CCO vs LAMR vs NXST vs GTN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OUT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 1.01, yield 3.8%, current ratio 2.69x
- +117.8% vs GTN's +27.7%
CCO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.6%, EPS growth 43.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.1%
- 6.6% revenue growth vs GTN's -15.1%
LAMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 4.3%
- 206.2% 10Y total return vs NXST's 331.4%
- 24.0% margin vs CCO's -12.5%
- Beta 0.64 vs GTN's 1.54
NXST is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, current ratio 2.07x
GTN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (1.8x vs 7.9x)
- 7.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs LAMR's 4.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.6% revenue growth vs GTN's -15.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.8x vs 7.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.0% margin vs CCO's -12.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs GTN's 1.54 | |
| Dividends | 7.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs LAMR's 4.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +117.8% vs GTN's +27.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.0% ROA vs CCO's -5.4%, ROIC 8.2% vs 7.4% |
OUT vs CCO vs LAMR vs NXST vs GTN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OUT vs CCO vs LAMR vs NXST vs GTN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LAMR leads in 3 of 6 categories
GTN leads 2 • OUT leads 1 • CCO leads 0 • NXST leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NXST is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.1B annually — 3.1x CCO's $1.6B. LAMR is the more profitable business, keeping 24.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCO's -12.5%. On growth, NXST holds the edge at +13.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $1.6B | $2.3B | $5.1B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $437M | $484M | $1.1B | $2.0B | $932M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $187M | -$205M | $550M | $165M | -$76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $234M | $73M | $769M | $708M | -$74M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.2% | +39.3% | +23.6% | +32.3% | +115.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.5% | +18.9% | +28.5% | +17.8% | +12.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | -12.5% | +24.0% | +3.2% | -2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +4.4% | +33.6% | +13.8% | -2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.0% | +11.9% | +4.5% | +13.1% | -1.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +178.6% | -175.0% | -25.9% | +51.0% | +98.5% |
Valuation Metrics
GTN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.2x trailing earnings, LAMR trades at a 60% valuation discount to NXST's 64.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NXST's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LAMR's 21.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.8B | $1.2B | $15.4B | $5.9B | $412M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.8B | $7.5B | $21.5B | $12.5B | $5.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.72x | -11.33x | 26.20x | 64.75x | -5.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.54x | — | 26.63x | 7.88x | 1.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.37x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.93x | 15.63x | 20.96x | 7.57x | 9.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.15x | 0.76x | 6.78x | 1.19x | 0.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.57x | — | 14.99x | 2.89x | 0.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.41x | 37.88x | 20.86x | 7.93x | 2.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LAMR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LAMR delivers a 55.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $-3 for GTN. GTN carries lower financial leverage with a 2.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LAMR's 6.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LAMR scores 6/9 vs GTN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +26.8% | — | +55.5% | +10.0% | -2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.6% | -5.4% | +8.0% | +1.9% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +7.4% | +8.2% | +7.4% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.3% | +9.0% | +11.4% | +8.2% | +3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.63x | — | 6.04x | 3.33x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.0B | $6.3B | $6.1B | $6.6B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $100M | $190M | $65M | $280M | $368M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.1B | $6.5B | $6.2B | $6.9B | $5.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.02x | 1.13x | 4.83x | 1.81x | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OUT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LAMR five years ago would be worth $16,809 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,729 for GTN. Over the past 12 months, OUT leads with a +117.8% total return vs GTN's +27.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OUT at 35.7% vs GTN's -9.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.7% | +12.3% | +23.1% | -6.1% | -6.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +117.8% | +116.4% | +33.2% | +29.4% | +27.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +150.0% | +88.9% | +78.3% | +29.1% | -26.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.9% | -7.0% | +68.1% | +50.1% | -72.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.2% | -43.7% | +206.2% | +331.4% | -50.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.7% | +23.6% | +21.3% | +8.9% | -9.6% |
Risk & Volatility
LAMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LAMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GTN's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LAMR currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs GTN's 68.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.31x | 0.64x | 0.73x | 1.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.08 | $2.43 | $151.36 | $254.30 | $6.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.45 | $1.00 | $112.00 | $154.64 | $3.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +97.9% | +99.9% | +76.4% | +68.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.9 | 48.5 | 69.3 | 43.2 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 7.0M | 557K | 402K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
GTN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OUT as "Buy", CCO as "Hold", LAMR as "Buy", NXST as "Buy", GTN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 80.6% upside for GTN (target: $8) vs -19.8% for OUT (target: $26). For income investors, GTN offers the higher dividend yield at 7.68% vs NXST's 2.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.33 | $2.25 | $145.00 | $250.00 | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 16 | 20 | 24 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.8% | — | +4.3% | +2.8% | +7.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.24 | — | $6.46 | $5.50 | $0.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +2.0% | 0.0% |
LAMR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GTN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
OUT vs CCO vs LAMR vs NXST vs GTN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OUT or CCO or LAMR or NXST or GTN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.
(CCO) is the stronger pick with 6. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 1% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) offers the better valuation at 26. 2x trailing P/E (26. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Outfront Media Inc. (OUT) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OUT or CCO or LAMR or NXST or GTN?
On trailing P/E, Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) is the cheapest at 26.
2x versus Nexstar Media Group, Inc. at 64. 8x. On forward P/E, Gray Media, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OUT or CCO or LAMR or NXST or GTN?
Over the past 5 years, Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) delivered a total return of +68.
1%, compared to -72. 7% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXST returned +331. 4% versus GTN's -50. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OUT or CCO or LAMR or NXST or GTN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
64β versus Gray Media, Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning GTN is approximately 143% more volatile than LAMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gray Media, Inc. (GTN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 6% for Lamar Advertising Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OUT or CCO or LAMR or NXST or GTN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.
(CCO) is pulling ahead at 6. 6% versus -15. 1% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lamar Advertising Company grew EPS 63. 9% year-over-year, compared to -126. 2% for Gray Media, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CCO leads at 5. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OUT or CCO or LAMR or NXST or GTN?
Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
9% net margin versus -6. 5% for Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAMR leads at 30. 8% versus 12. 7% for GTN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTN leads at 96. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OUT or CCO or LAMR or NXST or GTN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gray Media, Inc.
(GTN) trades at 1. 8x forward P/E versus 26. 6x for Lamar Advertising Company — 24. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GTN: 80. 6% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OUT or CCO or LAMR or NXST or GTN?
In this comparison, GTN (7.
7% yield), LAMR (4. 3% yield), OUT (3. 8% yield), NXST (2. 8% yield) pay a dividend. CCO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OUT or CCO or LAMR or NXST or GTN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
(NXST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 2. 8% yield, +331. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXST: +331. 4%, CCO: -43. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OUT and CCO and LAMR and NXST and GTN?
These companies operate in different sectors (OUT (Real Estate) and CCO (Communication Services) and LAMR (Real Estate) and NXST (Communication Services) and GTN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OUT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LAMR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; NXST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GTN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. OUT, LAMR, NXST, GTN pay a dividend while CCO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 23%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 6%
- Gross Margin > 19%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 68%
- Dividend Yield > 3.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.