Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
OVLY logo
OVLY
ICE logo
ICE
NDAQ logo
NDAQ
FIS logo
FIS
CME logo
CME
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OVLY vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs CME vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OVLY
Oak Valley Bancorp

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$294M
5Y Perf.+175.9%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$79.60B
5Y Perf.+53.4%
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$50.58B
5Y Perf.+123.5%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%
CME
CME Group Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$97.79B
5Y Perf.+65.8%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%

OVLY vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs CME vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OVLY logoOVLY
ICE logoICE
NDAQ logoNDAQ
FIS logoFIS
CME logoCME
KO logoKO
IndustryBanks - RegionalFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesInformation Technology ServicesFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$294M$79.60B$50.58B$20.26B$97.79B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$92M$12.64B$8.27B$11.66B$6.76B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$24M$3.30B$1.91B$2.67B$4.24B$13.70B
Gross Margin88.3%61.9%54.8%37.6%86.3%61.7%
Operating Margin33.5%38.7%29.5%17.9%65.6%29.3%
Forward P/E12.1x17.3x22.6x6.2x22.0x25.3x
Total Debt$8M$20.28B$9.93B$4.01B$3.76B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$203M$837M$814M$599M$4.42B$10.27B

OVLY vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs CME vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OVLY
ICE
NDAQ
FIS
CME
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY)100275.9+175.9%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100153.4+53.4%
Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ)100223.5+123.5%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%
CME Group Inc. (CME)100165.8+65.8%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OVLY vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs CME vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 2 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. Oak Valley Bancorp is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. ICE, NDAQ, CME, and KO also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
OVLY
Oak Valley Bancorp
The Banking Pick

OVLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 303.2% 10Y total return vs NDAQ's 344.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 3.7%, current ratio 148.25x
  • Beta 0.55, yield 1.7%, current ratio 148.25x
  • +35.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.

  • Beta 0.35 vs NDAQ's 0.71, lower leverage
Best for: stability
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
The Banking Pick

NDAQ is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 11.1%, EPS growth 60.1%
  • 11.1% NII/revenue growth vs OVLY's -8.6%
Best for: growth exposure
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
  • PEG 0.26 vs KO's 2.26
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.26 vs 2.26
  • 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
CME
CME Group Inc.
The Banking Pick

CME is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.

  • 62.8% margin vs FIS's 22.9%
Best for: quality
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Niche Pick

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.

  • 13.1% ROA vs OVLY's 1.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs 11.5%
Best for: efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNDAQ logoNDAQ11.1% NII/revenue growth vs OVLY's -8.6%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.26 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsCME logoCME62.8% margin vs FIS's 22.9%
Stability / SafetyICE logoICEBeta 0.35 vs NDAQ's 0.71, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)OVLY logoOVLY+35.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs OVLY's 1.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs 11.5%

OVLY vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs CME vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
OVLYOak Valley Bancorp

Segment breakdown not available.

ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M
NDAQNasdaq, Inc.
FY 2025
Market Services
51.4%$4.2B
Capital Access Platforms
26.1%$2.1B
Market Technology
22.6%$1.9B
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
CMECME Group Inc.
FY 2025
clearing and transaction fees
81.0%$5.3B
MarketData
12.3%$803M
OtherRevenue
6.7%$436M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

OVLY vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs CME vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLOVLYLAGGINGFIS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CME leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 537.9x OVLY's $92M. CME is the more profitable business, keeping 62.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 22.9%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOVLY logoOVLYOak Valley BancorpICE logoICEIntercontinental …NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…CME logoCMECME Group Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$92M$12.6B$8.3B$11.7B$6.8B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$31M$6.5B$3.1B$4.1B$4.7B$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$24M$3.3B$1.9B$2.7B$4.2B$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$25M$4.3B$2.0B$2.8B$4.4B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+88.3%+61.9%+54.8%+37.6%+86.3%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+33.5%+38.7%+29.5%+17.9%+65.6%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+26.1%+26.1%+23.1%+22.9%+62.8%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+27.0%+33.9%+24.2%+23.9%+64.4%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.1%+23.1%+33.8%+30.6%+21.4%+18.2%
CME leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OVLY leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.1x trailing earnings, OVLY trades at a 77% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), OVLY offers better value at 1.07x vs ICE's 2.74x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricOVLY logoOVLYOak Valley BancorpICE logoICEIntercontinental …NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…CME logoCMECME Group Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$294M$79.6B$50.6B$20.3B$97.8B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$99M$99.0B$59.7B$23.7B$97.1B$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.15x24.36x28.80x52.27x24.15x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.34x22.60x6.24x21.98x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.07x2.74x2.69x2.14x1.76x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.23x15.34x20.14x6.50x21.56x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.60x6.30x6.15x1.90x15.00x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.40x2.77x4.19x1.46x3.38x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.99x18.56x25.43x7.21x23.32x67.15x
OVLY leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $12 for ICE. OVLY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs CME's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricOVLY logoOVLYOak Valley BancorpICE logoICEIntercontinental …NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…CME logoCMECME Group Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.3%+11.6%+15.9%+18.4%+15.3%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.2%+2.3%+6.4%+7.5%+2.2%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.5%+7.5%+8.1%+6.0%+10.2%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.7%+9.5%+10.2%+6.6%+3.6%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9699657
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.70x0.81x0.29x0.13x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$195M$19.4B$9.1B$3.4B-$666M$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$203M$837M$814M$599M$4.4B$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$8M$20.3B$9.9B$4.0B$3.8B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.30x6.53x14.11x21.16x41.55x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NDAQ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in OVLY five years ago would be worth $20,395 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, OVLY leads with a +35.1% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NDAQ at 21.8% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOVLY logoOVLYOak Valley BancorpICE logoICEIntercontinental …NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…CME logoCMECME Group Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+19.1%-11.8%-7.3%-38.9%+3.2%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+35.1%-20.4%+4.0%-49.4%+3.6%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+47.4%+34.6%+80.8%-18.9%+67.9%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+103.9%+30.9%+60.2%-67.3%+46.2%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+303.2%+195.3%+344.3%-25.6%+262.4%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+13.8%+10.4%+21.8%-6.8%+18.9%+13.7%
NDAQ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CME and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CME is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NDAQ's 0.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOVLY logoOVLYOak Valley BancorpICE logoICEIntercontinental …NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…CME logoCMECME Group Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.55x0.35x0.71x0.61x-0.28x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$35.85$189.35$101.79$82.74$329.16$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$25.25$136.67$77.09$37.91$244.56$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.6%+74.2%+87.4%+47.4%+81.9%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.031.941.230.840.160.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded48K3.2M3.0M5.6M2.6M12.7M
Evenly matched — CME and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ICE as "Buy", NDAQ as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", CME as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs NDAQ's 1.17%.

MetricOVLY logoOVLYOak Valley BancorpICE logoICEIntercontinental …NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…CME logoCMECME Group Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$194.00$113.83$62.88$320.80$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts3636373648
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.7%+1.4%+1.2%+4.2%+4.1%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11131411556
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.61$1.93$1.04$1.63$10.92$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.7%+1.2%+7.0%+0.3%+0.2%
Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CME leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). OVLY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallOak Valley Bancorp (OVLY)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OVLY vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs CME vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OVLY or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or CME or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Nasdaq, Inc.

(NDAQ) is the stronger pick with 11. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 6% for Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY). Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OVLY or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or CME or KO?

On trailing P/E, Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY) is the cheapest at 12.

1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OVLY or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or CME or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY) delivered a total return of +103.

9%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NDAQ returned +344. 3% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OVLY or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or CME or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus Nasdaq, Inc. 's 0. 71β — meaning NDAQ is approximately -354% more volatile than CME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OVLY or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or CME or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nasdaq, Inc.

(NDAQ) is pulling ahead at 11. 1% versus -8. 6% for Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nasdaq, Inc. grew EPS 60. 1% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OVLY or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or CME or KO?

CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 0% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 62. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CME leads at 64. 9% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OVLY leads at 99. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OVLY or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or CME or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OVLY or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or CME or KO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 2% for Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ).

09

Is OVLY or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or CME or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 4. 1% yield, +262. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CME: +262. 4%, FIS: -25. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OVLY and ICE and NDAQ and FIS and CME and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (OVLY (Financial Services) and ICE (Financial Services) and NDAQ (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and CME (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: OVLY is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NDAQ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CME is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.