Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OZ vs NXRT vs IIPR vs ELME vs UDR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Office
REIT - Residential
OZ vs NXRT vs IIPR vs ELME vs UDR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | REIT - Residential | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Office | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $185M | $756M | $1.62B | $188M | $12.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $252M | $263M | $0.00 | $1.72B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-37M | $-32M | $120M | $-154M | $491M |
| Gross Margin | -73.7% | 91.1% | 60.3% | — | 46.0% |
| Operating Margin | -201.6% | 11.5% | 46.7% | — | 27.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 13.2x | — | 66.1x |
| Total Debt | $181M | $1.56B | $394M | $520M | $6.19B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $14M | $48M | $1.33B | $37M |
OZ vs NXRT vs IIPR vs ELME vs UDR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belpointe PREP, LLC (OZ) | 100 | 50.7 | -49.3% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 93.2 | -6.8% |
| Innovative Industri… (IIPR) | 100 | 69.3 | -30.7% |
| Elme Communities (ELME) | 100 | 9.7 | -90.3% |
| UDR, Inc. (UDR) | 100 | 99.9 | -0.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OZ vs NXRT vs IIPR vs ELME vs UDR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.7%, EPS growth -62.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 59.5%, current ratio 0.70x
- 18.7% FFO/revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0%
- Beta 0.31 vs IIPR's 0.92
NXRT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IIPR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 45.6% margin vs OZ's -5.1%
- +20.3% vs OZ's -19.5%
- 5.1% ROA vs ELME's -8.3%, ROIC 4.3% vs -15.3%
ELME ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 34.1%
- Beta 0.47, yield 34.1%, current ratio 1.02x
- 34.1% yield, vs UDR's 4.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
UDR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 38.8% 10Y total return vs NXRT's 211.1%
- PEG 1.60 vs IIPR's 3.52
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.7% FFO/revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.6% margin vs OZ's -5.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs IIPR's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 34.1% yield, vs UDR's 4.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.3% vs OZ's -19.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.1% ROA vs ELME's -8.3%, ROIC 4.3% vs -15.3% |
OZ vs NXRT vs IIPR vs ELME vs UDR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
OZ vs NXRT vs IIPR vs ELME vs UDR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IIPR leads in 3 of 6 categories
OZ leads 0 • NXRT leads 0 • ELME leads 0 • UDR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IIPR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UDR and ELME operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. IIPR is the more profitable business, keeping 45.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OZ's -5.1%. On growth, OZ holds the edge at +177.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $252M | $263M | $0 | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $125M | $197M | -$44M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | -$32M | $120M | -$154M | $491M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | $79M | $144M | $62M | $892M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -73.7% | +91.1% | +60.3% | — | +46.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +11.5% | +46.7% | — | +27.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | -12.7% | +45.6% | — | +28.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +31.2% | +54.7% | — | +52.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +177.0% | +0.5% | -3.8% | -4.0% | +0.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -72.6% | 0.0% | -1.0% | -6.6% | +147.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NXRT and IIPR each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, IIPR trades at a 56% valuation discount to UDR's 32.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UDR offers better value at 0.79x vs IIPR's 3.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $185M | $756M | $1.6B | $188M | $12.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $341M | $2.3B | $2.0B | -$624M | $18.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.73x | -23.65x | 14.40x | -1.21x | 32.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 13.17x | — | 66.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.85x | — | 0.79x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.60x | 9.91x | — | 18.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 69.05x | 3.01x | 6.08x | — | 7.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.61x | 2.52x | 0.87x | 0.78x | 2.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.05x | 9.26x | 3.03x | 19.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IIPR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UDR delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-19 for ELME. IIPR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UDR scores 7/9 vs OZ's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.9% | -10.1% | +6.4% | -18.9% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | -1.7% | +5.1% | -8.3% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.6% | +1.1% | +4.3% | -15.3% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.3% | +1.5% | +5.8% | -10.1% | +3.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 5.18x | 0.21x | 2.18x | 1.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $156M | $1.5B | $346M | -$812M | $6.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $14M | $48M | $1.3B | $37M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $181M | $1.6B | $394M | $520M | $6.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.35x | 0.47x | 6.67x | -3.82x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IIPR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UDR five years ago would be worth $9,739 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,999 for IIPR. Over the past 12 months, IIPR leads with a +20.3% total return vs OZ's -19.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IIPR at 4.5% vs OZ's -18.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.6% | +2.6% | +18.3% | -4.2% | +3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.5% | -15.2% | +20.3% | +8.1% | -9.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.1% | -15.5% | +14.1% | +13.3% | +1.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.3% | -23.0% | -50.0% | -15.3% | -2.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.2% | +211.1% | +436.4% | -11.6% | +38.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.6% | -5.5% | +4.5% | +4.2% | +0.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OZ and IIPR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IIPR's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IIPR currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs ELME's 12.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.31x | 0.62x | 0.92x | 0.47x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.00 | $38.30 | $61.40 | $17.68 | $43.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $48.50 | $23.79 | $44.58 | $1.98 | $32.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.6% | +77.8% | +92.2% | +12.0% | +85.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 71.0 | 59.3 | 50.6 | 64.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 216K | 303K | 1.2M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ELME and UDR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXRT as "Hold", IIPR as "Hold", ELME as "Hold", UDR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 796.2% upside for ELME (target: $19) vs -22.3% for IIPR (target: $44). For income investors, ELME offers the higher dividend yield at 34.11% vs UDR's 4.64%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $44.00 | $19.00 | $40.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 11 | 8 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.1% | +13.5% | +34.1% | +4.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.11 | $7.62 | $0.72 | $1.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% | +1.0% |
IIPR leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
OZ vs NXRT vs IIPR vs ELME vs UDR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OZ or NXRT or IIPR or ELME or UDR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Belpointe PREP, LLC (OZ) is the stronger pick with 18.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UDR, Inc. (UDR) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OZ or NXRT or IIPR or ELME or UDR?
On trailing P/E, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus UDR, Inc. at 32. 7x. On forward P/E, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: UDR, Inc. wins at 1. 60x versus Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. 's 3. 52x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OZ or NXRT or IIPR or ELME or UDR?
Over the past 5 years, UDR, Inc.
(UDR) delivered a total return of -2. 6%, compared to -50. 0% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIPR returned +436. 4% versus OZ's -49. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OZ or NXRT or IIPR or ELME or UDR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Belpointe PREP, LLC (OZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
31β versus Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning IIPR is approximately 193% more volatile than OZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OZ or NXRT or IIPR or ELME or UDR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Belpointe PREP, LLC (OZ) is pulling ahead at 18.
7% versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UDR, Inc. grew EPS 334. 6% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OZ leads at 39. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OZ or NXRT or IIPR or ELME or UDR?
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) is the more profitable company, earning 43. 0% net margin versus -891. 8% for Belpointe PREP, LLC — meaning it keeps 43. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IIPR leads at 46. 7% versus -504. 3% for OZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IIPR leads at 88. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OZ or NXRT or IIPR or ELME or UDR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, UDR, Inc. (UDR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 60x versus Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. 's 3. 52x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 66. 1x for UDR, Inc. — 52. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ELME: 796. 2% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OZ or NXRT or IIPR or ELME or UDR?
In this comparison, ELME (34.
1% yield), IIPR (13. 5% yield), NXRT (7. 1% yield), UDR (4. 6% yield) pay a dividend. OZ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OZ or NXRT or IIPR or ELME or UDR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, UDR, Inc.
(UDR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 4. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UDR: +38. 8%, OZ: -49. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OZ and NXRT and IIPR and ELME and UDR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IIPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; ELME is a small-cap income-oriented stock; UDR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. NXRT, IIPR, ELME, UDR pay a dividend while OZ does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.