Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OZK vs UMBF vs BOKF vs FFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
OZK vs UMBF vs BOKF vs FFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $5.34B | $9.99B | $10.28B | $4.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.81B | $4.44B | $3.36B | $739M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $715M | $883M | $537M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 55.4% | 54.4% | 57.1% | 70.8% |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | 20.3% | 19.8% | 36.8% |
| Forward P/E | 8.1x | 10.3x | 13.0x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $464M | $3.80B | $4.45B | $197M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $0.00 | $953M | $1.43B | $763M |
OZK vs UMBF vs BOKF vs FFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank OZK (OZK) | 100 | 214.9 | +114.9% |
| UMB Financial Corpo… (UMBF) | 100 | 255.8 | +155.8% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 262.0 | +162.0% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OZK vs UMBF vs BOKF vs FFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OZK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 28 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 7.6%, current ratio 0.80x
- PEG 0.37 vs BOKF's 4.38
- Beta 0.99, yield 3.6%, current ratio 0.80x
UMBF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 68.5%, EPS growth 1.6%
- 68.5% NII/revenue growth vs OZK's 1.1%
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 168.5% 10Y total return vs UMBF's 165.1%
- +44.8% vs FFIN's -3.2%
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.95 vs UMBF's 1.19, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 68.5% NII/revenue growth vs OZK's 1.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.37 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BOKF's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs UMBF's 1.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 28-year raise streak, vs UMBF's 1.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BOKF's 0.4% |
OZK vs UMBF vs BOKF vs FFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OZK vs UMBF vs BOKF vs FFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
OZK leads 2 • UMBF leads 0 • BOKF leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UMBF is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 6.0x FFIN's $739M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.8B | $4.4B | $3.4B | $739M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $1.1B | $797M | $310M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $715M | $883M | $537M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $732M | $985M | $1.5B | $290M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.4% | +54.4% | +57.1% | +70.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.3% | +20.3% | +19.8% | +36.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +15.8% | +15.6% | +30.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +22.0% | +42.6% | +39.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.9% | +176.9% | +1.8% | -7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
OZK leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, OZK trades at a 62% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), OZK offers better value at 0.35x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.3B | $10.0B | $10.3B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.8B | $12.8B | $13.3B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.83x | 14.37x | 16.39x | 20.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.14x | 10.31x | 13.05x | 15.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.35x | 1.59x | 5.51x | 3.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.21x | 12.11x | 17.23x | 14.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.90x | 2.25x | 3.06x | 6.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 1.30x | 1.53x | 2.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.29x | 10.21x | 7.19x | 15.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $9 for BOKF. OZK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OZK scores 7/9 vs FFIN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | +11.7% | +8.9% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +1.2% | +1.1% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | +7.5% | +4.1% | +11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | +14.4% | +5.5% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.49x | 0.80x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $464M | $2.8B | $3.0B | -$566M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $0 | $953M | $1.4B | $763M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $464M | $3.8B | $4.5B | $197M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.87x | 0.63x | 0.55x | 1.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — UMBF and BOKF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOKF five years ago would be worth $15,944 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.8% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UMBF at 34.6% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.7% | +13.0% | +13.0% | +8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.6% | +31.1% | +44.8% | -3.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.5% | +143.7% | +79.4% | +29.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.7% | +41.5% | +59.4% | -28.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.6% | +165.1% | +168.5% | +145.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.8% | +34.6% | +21.5% | +8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UMBF and FFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FFIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UMBF's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UMBF currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 1.19x | 1.03x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.66 | $136.11 | $139.73 | $38.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $42.37 | $98.16 | $91.35 | $28.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.1% | +96.4% | +95.5% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 78.4 | 58.9 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 613K | 317K | 740K |
Analyst Outlook
OZK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OZK as "Hold", UMBF as "Buy", BOKF as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -1.4% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, OZK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.63% vs UMBF's 1.35%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $58.00 | $150.40 | $131.57 | $39.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 18 | 21 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.6% | +1.4% | +1.7% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 28 | 17 | 11 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.76 | $1.77 | $2.24 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.7% | +1.3% | +0.9% | 0.0% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OZK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
OZK vs UMBF vs BOKF vs FFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OZK or UMBF or BOKF or FFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) is the stronger pick with 68.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Bank OZK (OZK). Bank OZK (OZK) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OZK or UMBF or BOKF or FFIN?
On trailing P/E, Bank OZK (OZK) is the cheapest at 7.
8x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, Bank OZK is actually cheaper at 8. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank OZK wins at 0. 37x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OZK or UMBF or BOKF or FFIN?
Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +59.
4%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOKF returned +168. 5% versus OZK's +63. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OZK or UMBF or BOKF or FFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus UMB Financial Corporation's 1. 19β — meaning UMBF is approximately 25% more volatile than FFIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bank OZK (OZK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OZK or UMBF or BOKF or FFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) is pulling ahead at 68.
5% versus 1. 1% for Bank OZK (OZK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 12. 2% year-over-year, compared to 0. 5% for Bank OZK. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OZK or UMBF or BOKF or FFIN?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OZK or UMBF or BOKF or FFIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank OZK (OZK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 37x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank OZK (OZK) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 7. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — OZK or UMBF or BOKF or FFIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Bank OZK (OZK) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 1. 4% for UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF).
09Is OZK or UMBF or BOKF or FFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 2. 2% yield, +145. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FFIN: +145. 4%, UMBF: +165. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OZK and UMBF and BOKF and FFIN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OZK is a small-cap deep-value stock; UMBF is a small-cap high-growth stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.