Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PAGS vs TOST vs FOUR vs RELY vs PYPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Financial - Credit Services
PAGS vs TOST vs FOUR vs RELY vs PYPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $1.73B | $17.02B | $3.81B | $4.80B | $40.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19.82B | $6.45B | $3.33B | $1.73B | $33.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.13B | $412M | $86M | $106M | $5.06B |
| Gross Margin | 50.8% | 26.2% | 35.2% | 43.6% | 46.6% |
| Operating Margin | 37.5% | 5.6% | 11.3% | 6.9% | 18.3% |
| Forward P/E | 1.1x | 23.7x | 8.4x | 44.1x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $34.86B | $40M | $4.62B | $220M | $9.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.86B | $1.35B | $964M | $542M | $8.05B |
PAGS vs TOST vs FOUR vs RELY vs PYPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PagSeguro Digital L… (PAGS) | 100 | 19.6 | -80.4% |
| Toast, Inc. (TOST) | 100 | 58.8 | -41.2% |
| Shift4 Payments, In… (FOUR) | 100 | 60.4 | -39.6% |
| Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) | 100 | 62.1 | -37.9% |
| PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL) | 100 | 17.8 | -82.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PAGS vs TOST vs FOUR vs RELY vs PYPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PAGS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.70, yield 4.1%
- PEG 0.09 vs PYPL's 0.98
- Lower P/E (1.1x vs 8.7x), PEG 0.09 vs 0.98
- 4.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs FOUR's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
TOST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 13.8% ROA vs FOUR's 1.0%, ROIC 30.8% vs 6.3%
FOUR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 39.7% 10Y total return vs RELY's -53.0%
RELY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 29.4%, EPS growth 263.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 25.4%, current ratio 3.30x
- Beta 1.19, current ratio 3.30x
- 29.4% revenue growth vs PYPL's 4.3%
PYPL is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 15.8% margin vs FOUR's 2.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.4% revenue growth vs PYPL's 4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.1x vs 8.7x), PEG 0.09 vs 0.98 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.8% margin vs FOUR's 2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.19 vs PAGS's 1.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs FOUR's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.9% vs FOUR's -43.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.8% ROA vs FOUR's 1.0%, ROIC 30.8% vs 6.3% |
PAGS vs TOST vs FOUR vs RELY vs PYPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PAGS vs TOST vs FOUR vs RELY vs PYPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAGS leads in 2 of 6 categories
TOST leads 1 • RELY leads 1 • FOUR leads 0 • PYPL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PAGS and RELY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PYPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.2B annually — 19.2x RELY's $1.7B. PYPL is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FOUR's 2.6%. On growth, RELY holds the edge at +25.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19.8B | $6.4B | $3.3B | $1.7B | $33.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.8B | $409M | $629M | $149M | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.1B | $412M | $86M | $106M | $5.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $708M | $654M | $687M | $256M | $5.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.8% | +26.2% | +35.2% | +43.6% | +46.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +5.6% | +11.3% | +6.9% | +18.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +6.4% | +2.6% | +6.1% | +15.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +10.1% | +20.6% | +14.8% | +16.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.0% | +21.9% | -100.0% | +25.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.4% | +127.5% | -105.0% | +3.6% | -6.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PAGS leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.2x trailing earnings, PAGS trades at a 90% valuation discount to RELY's 73.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PAGS offers better value at 0.59x vs PYPL's 0.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $17.0B | $3.8B | $4.8B | $40.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.4B | $15.7B | $7.5B | $4.5B | $42.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.20x | 52.43x | 43.39x | 73.52x | 8.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.14x | 23.69x | 8.41x | 44.06x | 8.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.59x | — | — | — | 0.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.72x | 42.22x | 9.53x | 41.98x | 6.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.44x | 2.77x | 0.91x | 2.94x | 1.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 8.39x | 2.13x | 5.71x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.50x | 27.99x | 7.63x | 16.24x | 7.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TOST leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PYPL delivers a 25.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $4 for FOUR. TOST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAGS's 2.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PYPL scores 8/9 vs RELY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.4% | +20.7% | +4.4% | +12.7% | +25.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +13.8% | +1.0% | +8.1% | +6.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.7% | +30.8% | +6.3% | +14.2% | +15.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.6% | +15.9% | +6.3% | +9.4% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.38x | 0.02x | 2.36x | 0.25x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $33.0B | -$1.3B | $3.7B | -$322M | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $1.4B | $964M | $542M | $8.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $34.9B | $40M | $4.6B | $220M | $10.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.50x | — | 3.40x | 16.25x | 19.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TOST and FOUR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FOUR five years ago would be worth $5,364 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,835 for PYPL. Over the past 12 months, PAGS leads with a +13.9% total return vs FOUR's -43.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TOST at 14.9% vs PYPL's -14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.6% | -13.7% | -25.2% | +72.4% | -20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.9% | -17.4% | -43.7% | +8.1% | -32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.9% | +51.7% | -24.0% | +25.4% | -38.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.9% | -53.0% | -46.4% | -53.0% | -81.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.7% | -53.0% | +39.7% | -53.0% | +17.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.3% | +14.9% | -8.7% | +7.8% | -14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
RELY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RELY is the less volatile stock with a 1.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PAGS's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RELY currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs FOUR's 43.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.70x | 1.44x | 1.51x | 1.19x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.32 | $49.66 | $108.50 | $24.71 | $79.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.74 | $24.35 | $39.91 | $12.08 | $38.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.1% | +59.1% | +43.2% | +92.2% | +58.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 50.5 | 43.3 | 85.3 | 40.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.7M | 9.9M | 2.2M | 3.4M | 15.4M |
Analyst Outlook
PAGS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PAGS as "Buy", TOST as "Buy", FOUR as "Buy", RELY as "Buy", PYPL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 56.6% upside for FOUR (target: $73) vs -7.9% for RELY (target: $21). For income investors, PAGS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.05% vs PYPL's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.18 | $39.76 | $73.36 | $21.00 | $51.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 29 | 29 | 13 | 70 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | — | +0.7% | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.03 | — | $0.34 | — | $0.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | +12.8% | +1.1% | +14.8% |
PAGS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). TOST leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
PAGS vs TOST vs FOUR vs RELY vs PYPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PAGS or TOST or FOUR or RELY or PYPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is the stronger pick with 29. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS) offers the better valuation at 7. 2x trailing P/E (1. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PAGS or TOST or FOUR or RELY or PYPL?
On trailing P/E, PagSeguro Digital Ltd.
(PAGS) is the cheapest at 7. 2x versus Remitly Global, Inc. at 73. 5x. On forward P/E, PagSeguro Digital Ltd. is actually cheaper at 1. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PagSeguro Digital Ltd. wins at 0. 09x versus PayPal Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 98x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PAGS or TOST or FOUR or RELY or PYPL?
Over the past 5 years, Shift4 Payments, Inc.
(FOUR) delivered a total return of -46. 4%, compared to -81. 6% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOUR returned +39. 7% versus PAGS's -62. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PAGS or TOST or FOUR or RELY or PYPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 19β versus PagSeguro Digital Ltd. 's 1. 70β — meaning PAGS is approximately 43% more volatile than RELY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Toast, Inc. (TOST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for PagSeguro Digital Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PAGS or TOST or FOUR or RELY or PYPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is pulling ahead at 29. 4% versus 4. 3% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Toast, Inc. grew EPS 1639% year-over-year, compared to -64. 4% for Shift4 Payments, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RELY leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PAGS or TOST or FOUR or RELY or PYPL?
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 8% net margin versus 2. 8% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAGS leads at 37. 5% versus 5. 0% for TOST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RELY leads at 57. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PAGS or TOST or FOUR or RELY or PYPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 09x versus PayPal Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 98x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS) trades at 1. 1x forward P/E versus 44. 1x for Remitly Global, Inc. — 42. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOUR: 56. 6% to $73. 36.
08Which pays a better dividend — PAGS or TOST or FOUR or RELY or PYPL?
In this comparison, PAGS (4.
1% yield), FOUR (0. 7% yield), PYPL (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. TOST, RELY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PAGS or TOST or FOUR or RELY or PYPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shift4 Payments, Inc.
(FOUR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOUR: +39. 7%, TOST: -53. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PAGS and TOST and FOUR and RELY and PYPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (PAGS (Technology) and TOST (Technology) and FOUR (Technology) and RELY (Technology) and PYPL (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PAGS is a small-cap deep-value stock; TOST is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FOUR is a small-cap high-growth stock; RELY is a small-cap high-growth stock; PYPL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. PAGS, FOUR pay a dividend while TOST, RELY, PYPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.