Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PATK vs DHI vs PHM vs NVR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
PATK vs DHI vs PHM vs NVR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Residential Construction | Residential Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $3.17B | $42.29B | $22.46B | $16.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.94B | $33.35B | $16.83B | $10.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $136M | $3.17B | $2.04B | $1.34B |
| Gross Margin | 22.5% | 22.8% | 26.1% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.0% | 11.8% | 16.4% | 16.5% |
| Forward P/E | 18.2x | 13.7x | 11.7x | 16.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.64B | $6.03B | $2.40B | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26M | $2.99B | $2.01B | $1.96B |
PATK vs DHI vs PHM vs NVR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Industries,… (PATK) | 100 | 275.2 | +175.2% |
| D.R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) | 100 | 267.0 | +167.0% |
| PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) | 100 | 346.0 | +246.0% |
| NVR, Inc. (NVR) | 100 | 185.4 | +85.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PATK vs DHI vs PHM vs NVR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PATK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.3%, EPS growth -5.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
- 6.3% revenue growth vs DHI's -6.9%
- 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs DHI's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
DHI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 24.4%, current ratio 17.39x
- Beta 0.85, yield 1.1%, current ratio 17.39x
- +20.3% vs NVR's -15.3%
PHM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs DHI's 424.3%
- PEG 0.71 vs NVR's 1.21
- Lower P/E (11.7x vs 16.6x), PEG 0.71 vs 1.21
NVR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.
- 13.2% margin vs PATK's 3.5%
- Beta 0.68 vs PHM's 1.01
- 22.3% ROA vs PATK's 4.4%, ROIC 43.8% vs 7.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.3% revenue growth vs DHI's -6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 16.6x), PEG 0.71 vs 1.21 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.2% margin vs PATK's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs PHM's 1.01 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs DHI's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.3% vs NVR's -15.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.3% ROA vs PATK's 4.4%, ROIC 43.8% vs 7.6% |
PATK vs DHI vs PHM vs NVR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PATK vs DHI vs PHM vs NVR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVR leads in 2 of 6 categories
PHM leads 1 • PATK leads 0 • DHI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHI is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.3B annually — 8.5x PATK's $3.9B. NVR is the more profitable business, keeping 13.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PATK's 3.5%. On growth, PATK holds the edge at -0.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.9B | $33.3B | $16.8B | $10.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $445M | $4.0B | $2.8B | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $136M | $3.2B | $2.0B | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $194M | $3.5B | $1.6B | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +22.8% | +26.1% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.0% | +11.8% | +16.4% | +16.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +9.5% | +12.1% | +13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +10.5% | +9.8% | +10.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.6% | -2.3% | -12.4% | -4.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.9% | -13.2% | -30.4% | -13.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PHM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, PHM trades at a 57% valuation discount to PATK's 24.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PHM offers better value at 0.64x vs NVR's 1.01x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $42.3B | $22.5B | $16.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.8B | $45.3B | $22.9B | $15.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.45x | 12.62x | 10.51x | 13.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.24x | 13.71x | 11.75x | 16.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.01x | 0.64x | 1.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.72x | 10.02x | 7.35x | 8.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.80x | 1.23x | 1.30x | 1.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.79x | 1.83x | 1.80x | 4.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.86x | 12.88x | 12.84x | 15.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVR delivers a 34.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $12 for PATK. PHM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PATK's 1.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PATK scores 6/9 vs NVR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.6% | +12.9% | +15.9% | +34.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.4% | +8.9% | +11.4% | +22.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +12.1% | +17.2% | +43.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.2% | +13.1% | +20.0% | +32.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.39x | 0.24x | 0.19x | 0.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $3.0B | $394M | -$760M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26M | $3.0B | $2.0B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $6.0B | $2.4B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.40x | 44.09x | 5590.17x | 63.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PATK and DHI and PHM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PHM five years ago would be worth $19,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,530 for NVR. Over the past 12 months, DHI leads with a +20.3% total return vs NVR's -15.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PATK at 31.7% vs NVR's 0.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.2% | +0.8% | -1.6% | -17.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.6% | +20.3% | +16.3% | -15.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.2% | +38.6% | +76.2% | +2.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.6% | +46.7% | +95.4% | +15.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +395.2% | +424.3% | +571.2% | +264.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.7% | +11.5% | +20.8% | +0.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PHM and NVR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NVR is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PHM's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PHM currently trades 81.0% from its 52-week high vs PATK's 64.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 0.86x | 1.01x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $148.50 | $184.55 | $144.27 | $8618.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.35 | $114.17 | $95.20 | $5930.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.2% | +79.1% | +81.0% | +69.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.8 | 49.6 | 46.5 | 36.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 469K | 2.6M | 1.7M | 19K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PATK and DHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PATK as "Buy", DHI as "Hold", PHM as "Hold", NVR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.7% upside for PATK (target: $127) vs 12.3% for DHI (target: $164). For income investors, PATK offers the higher dividend yield at 1.67% vs PHM's 0.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $126.50 | $163.86 | $141.22 | $7465.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 52 | 44 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +1.1% | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 | 7 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.60 | $1.60 | $0.89 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +10.1% | +5.5% | +11.0% |
NVR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PHM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
PATK vs DHI vs PHM vs NVR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PATK or DHI or PHM or NVR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Patrick Industries, Inc.
(PATK) is the stronger pick with 6. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI). PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PATK or DHI or PHM or NVR?
On trailing P/E, PulteGroup, Inc.
(PHM) is the cheapest at 10. 5x versus Patrick Industries, Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, PulteGroup, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PulteGroup, Inc. wins at 0. 71x versus NVR, Inc. 's 1. 21x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PATK or DHI or PHM or NVR?
Over the past 5 years, PulteGroup, Inc.
(PHM) delivered a total return of +95. 4%, compared to +15. 3% for NVR, Inc. (NVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PHM returned +574. 9% versus NVR's +262. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PATK or DHI or PHM or NVR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVR, Inc.
(NVR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus PulteGroup, Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning PHM is approximately 49% more volatile than NVR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 139% for Patrick Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PATK or DHI or PHM or NVR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Patrick Industries, Inc.
(PATK) is pulling ahead at 6. 3% versus -6. 9% for D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Patrick Industries, Inc. grew EPS -5. 1% year-over-year, compared to -24. 3% for PulteGroup, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PHM leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PATK or DHI or PHM or NVR?
NVR, Inc.
(NVR) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 0% net margin versus 3. 4% for Patrick Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PHM leads at 17. 3% versus 7. 0% for PATK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PHM leads at 26. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PATK or DHI or PHM or NVR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 71x versus NVR, Inc. 's 1. 21x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 18. 2x for Patrick Industries, Inc. — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PATK: 32. 7% to $126. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PATK or DHI or PHM or NVR?
In this comparison, PATK (1.
7% yield), DHI (1. 1% yield), PHM (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. NVR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PATK or DHI or PHM or NVR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 1. 1% yield, +429. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHI: +429. 9%, NVR: +262. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PATK and DHI and PHM and NVR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PATK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DHI is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PHM is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NVR is a mid-cap deep-value stock. PATK, DHI, PHM pay a dividend while NVR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.