Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PAYS vs ACLX vs LEGN vs USIO vs PRTH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
PAYS vs ACLX vs LEGN vs USIO vs PRTH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $369M | $6.73B | $5.28B | $36M | $451M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $75M | $22M | $1.03B | $85M | $953M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $-229M | $-297M | $-3M | $56M |
| Gross Margin | 59.8% | -64.8% | 60.3% | 23.1% | 21.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | -11.4% | -13.2% | -2.6% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 28.3x | — | 118.1x | — | 5.8x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $96M | $414M | $3M | $1.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $80M | $902M | $7M | $77M |
PAYS vs ACLX vs LEGN vs USIO vs PRTH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) | 100 | 309.2 | +209.2% |
| Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX) | 100 | 599.9 | +499.9% |
| Legend Biotech Corp… (LEGN) | 100 | 72.2 | -27.8% |
| Usio, Inc. (USIO) | 100 | 39.8 | -60.2% |
| Priority Technology… (PRTH) | 100 | 104.8 | +4.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PAYS vs ACLX vs LEGN vs USIO vs PRTH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PAYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 26.4% 10Y total return vs ACLX's 5.8%
- 10.1% margin vs ACLX's -10.3%
- +188.0% vs PRTH's -10.4%
- 3.8% ROA vs ACLX's -36.2%, ROIC 4.6% vs -46.2%
Among these 5 stocks, ACLX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LEGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.
- Rev growth 64.5%, EPS growth -66.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 106.6%
- Beta 0.77, current ratio 1.96x
- 64.5% revenue growth vs ACLX's -79.4%
USIO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.60
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 14.1%, current ratio 1.08x
- Beta 0.60 vs PRTH's 2.12
PRTH is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.5% revenue growth vs ACLX's -79.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.1% margin vs ACLX's -10.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs PRTH's 2.12 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +188.0% vs PRTH's -10.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.8% ROA vs ACLX's -36.2%, ROIC 4.6% vs -46.2% |
PAYS vs ACLX vs LEGN vs USIO vs PRTH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PAYS vs ACLX vs LEGN vs USIO vs PRTH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACLX leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRTH leads 1 • PAYS leads 1 • LEGN leads 0 • USIO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LEGN and PRTH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEGN is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 46.2x ACLX's $22M. PAYS is the more profitable business, keeping 10.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACLX's -10.3%. On growth, LEGN holds the edge at +64.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $75M | $22M | $1.0B | $85M | $953M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | -$246M | -$107M | -$298,381 | $204M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | -$229M | -$297M | -$3M | $56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | -$213M | -$231M | $1.08T | $75M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.8% | -64.8% | +60.3% | +23.1% | +21.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | -11.4% | -13.2% | -2.6% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | -10.3% | -28.8% | -2.9% | +5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | -9.5% | -22.4% | +12632.5% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.6% | -89.2% | +64.9% | +8.2% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.2% | -13.6% | -2.2% | -3.3% | +3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PRTH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, PRTH trades at a 92% valuation discount to PAYS's 97.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRTH's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PAYS's 51.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $369M | $6.7B | $5.3B | $36M | $451M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $361M | $6.7B | $4.8B | $31M | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 97.81x | -28.27x | -8.87x | -14.04x | 8.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.25x | — | 118.11x | — | 5.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 51.52x | — | — | — | 6.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.33x | 302.09x | 5.11x | 0.43x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.25x | 16.10x | 2.63x | 1.97x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.44x | — | — | 33.67x | 6.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYS delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-55 for ACLX. PAYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LEGN's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PAYS scores 7/9 vs ACLX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.2% | -55.4% | -29.2% | -13.5% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | -36.2% | -17.6% | -2.2% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | -46.2% | -12.7% | -12.0% | +13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | -46.6% | -11.0% | -10.4% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.24x | 0.41x | 0.14x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $16M | -$488M | -$5M | $969M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $80M | $902M | $7M | $77M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $96M | $414M | $3M | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -8.45x | -12.69x | -43.10x | 1.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACLX five years ago would be worth $68,494 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,172 for USIO. Over the past 12 months, PAYS leads with a +188.0% total return vs PRTH's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACLX at 38.6% vs LEGN's -25.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.3% | +81.7% | +32.8% | -5.1% | +3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +188.0% | +117.4% | -9.2% | -9.7% | -10.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.5% | +166.2% | -58.4% | -33.8% | +50.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.0% | +584.9% | -0.0% | -78.3% | -15.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2639.9% | +584.9% | -22.8% | -32.8% | -43.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.3% | +38.6% | -25.4% | -12.9% | +14.6% |
Risk & Volatility
ACLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACLX is the less volatile stock with a -0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRTH's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACLX currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs PRTH's 62.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | -0.34x | 0.77x | 0.60x | 2.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.88 | $115.13 | $45.30 | $2.02 | $8.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.28 | $47.86 | $16.24 | $1.03 | $4.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.6% | +99.9% | +63.1% | +64.9% | +62.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.9 | 79.9 | 77.4 | 69.0 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 889K | 1.6M | 1.9M | 37K | 252K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PAYS as "Buy", ACLX as "Hold", LEGN as "Buy", PRTH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 102.6% upside for LEGN (target: $58) vs -2.3% for ACLX (target: $112).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $112.45 | $57.89 | — | $11.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 18 | 19 | — | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.9% | +2.3% |
ACLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). PRTH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PAYS vs ACLX vs LEGN vs USIO vs PRTH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PAYS or ACLX or LEGN or USIO or PRTH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is the stronger pick with 64.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -79. 4% for Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PAYS or ACLX or LEGN or USIO or PRTH?
On trailing P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus PaySign, Inc. at 97. 8x. On forward P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PAYS or ACLX or LEGN or USIO or PRTH?
Over the past 5 years, Arcellx, Inc.
(ACLX) delivered a total return of +584. 9%, compared to -78. 3% for Usio, Inc. (USIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAYS returned +26. 4% versus PRTH's -43. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PAYS or ACLX or LEGN or USIO or PRTH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arcellx, Inc.
(ACLX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 34β versus Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning PRTH is approximately -726% more volatile than ACLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 41% for Legend Biotech Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PAYS or ACLX or LEGN or USIO or PRTH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is pulling ahead at 64.
5% versus -79. 4% for Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 319. 4% year-over-year, compared to -177. 8% for Usio, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LEGN leads at 106. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PAYS or ACLX or LEGN or USIO or PRTH?
PaySign, Inc.
(PAYS) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus -1027. 3% for Arcellx, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRTH leads at 14. 8% versus -1135. 6% for ACLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACLX leads at 70. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PAYS or ACLX or LEGN or USIO or PRTH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) trades at 5. 8x forward P/E versus 118. 1x for Legend Biotech Corporation — 112. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LEGN: 102. 6% to $57. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — PAYS or ACLX or LEGN or USIO or PRTH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PAYS or ACLX or LEGN or USIO or PRTH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arcellx, Inc.
(ACLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 34), +584. 9% 10Y return). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACLX: +584. 9%, PRTH: -43. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PAYS and ACLX and LEGN and USIO and PRTH?
These companies operate in different sectors (PAYS (Technology) and ACLX (Healthcare) and LEGN (Healthcare) and USIO (Technology) and PRTH (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PAYS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LEGN is a small-cap high-growth stock; USIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.