Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PBI vs QUAD vs XRX vs SRPT vs ORCL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Information Technology Services
Biotechnology
Software - Infrastructure
PBI vs QUAD vs XRX vs SRPT vs ORCL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Specialty Business Services | Information Technology Services | Biotechnology | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $2.33B | $400M | $310M | $2.18B | $559.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.88B | $2.37B | $7.41B | $2.18B | $64.08B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $167M | $27M | $-1.04B | $65M | $16.21B |
| Gross Margin | 54.7% | 18.5% | 25.7% | 34.4% | 66.4% |
| Operating Margin | 19.7% | 5.0% | -0.6% | -1.9% | 30.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.2x | 6.3x | 5.1x | 6.9x | 26.0x |
| Total Debt | $2.22B | $444M | $4.25B | $1.04B | $104.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $285M | $63M | $512M | $801M | $10.79B |
PBI vs QUAD vs XRX vs SRPT vs ORCL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pitney Bowes Inc. (PBI) | 100 | 657.2 | +557.2% |
| Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD) | 100 | 268.8 | +168.8% |
| Xerox Holdings Corp… (XRX) | 100 | 14.9 | -85.1% |
| Sarepta Therapeutic… (SRPT) | 100 | 13.7 | -86.3% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 100 | 361.8 | +261.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PBI vs QUAD vs XRX vs SRPT vs ORCL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PBI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +77.7% vs XRX's -53.5%
QUAD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.03, yield 3.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, current ratio 0.86x
- Beta 1.03, yield 3.8%, current ratio 0.86x
- Beta 1.03 vs XRX's 2.68, lower leverage
XRX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (5.1x vs 26.0x)
- 23.7% yield, vs ORCL's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SRPT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.6%, EPS growth -404.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.1%
- 15.6% revenue growth vs QUAD's -9.4%
ORCL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 425.1% 10Y total return vs QUAD's -23.3%
- 25.3% margin vs XRX's -14.1%
- 8.1% ROA vs XRX's -10.8%, ROIC 12.8% vs -1.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.6% revenue growth vs QUAD's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 26.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.3% margin vs XRX's -14.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs XRX's 2.68, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 23.7% yield, vs ORCL's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.7% vs XRX's -53.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs XRX's -10.8%, ROIC 12.8% vs -1.0% |
PBI vs QUAD vs XRX vs SRPT vs ORCL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PBI vs QUAD vs XRX vs SRPT vs ORCL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ORCL leads in 1 of 6 categories
XRX leads 1 • PBI leads 1 • QUAD leads 0 • SRPT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORCL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORCL is the larger business by revenue, generating $64.1B annually — 34.1x PBI's $1.9B. ORCL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XRX's -14.1%. On growth, XRX holds the edge at +26.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $2.4B | $7.4B | $2.2B | $64.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $452M | $196M | $330M | -$6M | $26.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $167M | $27M | -$1.0B | $65M | $16.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $391M | $44M | $267M | $107M | -$24.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.7% | +18.5% | +25.7% | +34.4% | +66.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +5.0% | -0.6% | -1.9% | +30.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +1.2% | -14.1% | +3.0% | +25.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.8% | +1.9% | +3.6% | +4.9% | -38.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.2% | -7.7% | +26.7% | -1.9% | +21.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.7% | +18.2% | -13.3% | +162.6% | +24.5% |
Valuation Metrics
XRX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, QUAD trades at a 68% valuation discount to ORCL's 44.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, QUAD's 4.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ORCL's 27.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $400M | $310M | $2.2B | $559.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $781M | $4.0B | $2.4B | $652.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.54x | 14.19x | -0.29x | -2.92x | 44.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.22x | 6.30x | 5.14x | 6.93x | 25.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 6.31x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.55x | 3.96x | 14.71x | — | 27.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.23x | 0.17x | 0.04x | 0.99x | 9.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.97x | 0.45x | 1.91x | 26.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.77x | 7.90x | 1.20x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PBI and ORCL each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ORCL delivers a 56.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $-142 for XRX. SRPT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.91x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XRX's 6.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PBI scores 7/9 vs XRX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +25.0% | -142.4% | +4.9% | +56.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | +2.2% | -10.8% | +1.9% | +8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +27.2% | +17.9% | -1.0% | -31.4% | +12.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.1% | +19.3% | -0.9% | -24.0% | +14.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.45x | 6.31x | 0.91x | 4.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.9B | $381M | $3.7B | $238M | $93.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $285M | $63M | $512M | $801M | $10.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.2B | $444M | $4.2B | $1.0B | $104.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.16x | 2.11x | -0.14x | -14.00x | 5.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PBI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QUAD five years ago would be worth $25,813 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,593 for XRX. Over the past 12 months, PBI leads with a +77.7% total return vs XRX's -53.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PBI at 75.9% vs SRPT's -45.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +51.6% | +33.6% | -2.6% | -2.4% | -0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.7% | +44.4% | -53.5% | -43.4% | +31.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +443.8% | +197.1% | -70.5% | -83.6% | +106.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.6% | +158.1% | -74.1% | -72.1% | +151.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.5% | -23.3% | -42.4% | +18.0% | +425.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +75.9% | +43.8% | -33.4% | -45.3% | +27.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PBI and QUAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QUAD is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XRX's 2.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PBI currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs XRX's 34.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 1.03x | 2.68x | 2.02x | 1.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.95 | $8.64 | $6.80 | $44.14 | $345.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.81 | $5.01 | $1.19 | $10.42 | $134.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +88.7% | +34.9% | +47.1% | +56.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.4 | 50.6 | 74.8 | 63.4 | 68.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 231K | 5.6M | 3.0M | 26.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — XRX and ORCL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PBI as "Hold", QUAD as "Buy", XRX as "Sell", SRPT as "Buy", ORCL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 332.5% upside for XRX (target: $10) vs -19.3% for PBI (target: $13). For income investors, XRX offers the higher dividend yield at 23.69% vs ORCL's 0.85%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.57 | $8.00 | $10.25 | $24.63 | $257.19 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 7 | 5 | 54 | 86 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +3.8% | +23.7% | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 0 | — | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.30 | $0.29 | $0.56 | — | $1.65 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +16.2% | +2.0% | 0.0% | +1.1% | +0.3% |
ORCL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). XRX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
PBI vs QUAD vs XRX vs SRPT vs ORCL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PBI or QUAD or XRX or SRPT or ORCL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
(SRPT) is the stronger pick with 15. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD). Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (6. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PBI or QUAD or XRX or SRPT or ORCL?
On trailing P/E, Quad/Graphics, Inc.
(QUAD) is the cheapest at 14. 2x versus Oracle Corporation at 44. 8x. On forward P/E, Xerox Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 5. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PBI or QUAD or XRX or SRPT or ORCL?
Over the past 5 years, Quad/Graphics, Inc.
(QUAD) delivered a total return of +158. 1%, compared to -74. 1% for Xerox Holdings Corporation (XRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORCL returned +425. 1% versus XRX's -42. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PBI or QUAD or XRX or SRPT or ORCL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Quad/Graphics, Inc.
(QUAD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Xerox Holdings Corporation's 2. 68β — meaning XRX is approximately 161% more volatile than QUAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 91% versus 6% for Xerox Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PBI or QUAD or XRX or SRPT or ORCL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
(SRPT) is pulling ahead at 15. 6% versus -9. 4% for Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pitney Bowes Inc. grew EPS 174. 3% year-over-year, compared to -404. 7% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SRPT leads at 33. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PBI or QUAD or XRX or SRPT or ORCL?
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus -32. 5% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORCL leads at 30. 8% versus -29. 9% for SRPT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ORCL leads at 70. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PBI or QUAD or XRX or SRPT or ORCL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Xerox Holdings Corporation (XRX) trades at 5.
1x forward P/E versus 26. 0x for Oracle Corporation — 20. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XRX: 332. 5% to $10. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — PBI or QUAD or XRX or SRPT or ORCL?
In this comparison, XRX (23.
7% yield), QUAD (3. 8% yield), PBI (1. 9% yield), ORCL (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. SRPT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PBI or QUAD or XRX or SRPT or ORCL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Quad/Graphics, Inc.
(QUAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), 3. 8% yield). Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QUAD: -23. 3%, SRPT: +18. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PBI and QUAD and XRX and SRPT and ORCL?
These companies operate in different sectors (PBI (Industrials) and QUAD (Industrials) and XRX (Technology) and SRPT (Healthcare) and ORCL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QUAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; XRX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SRPT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ORCL is a large-cap quality compounder stock. PBI, QUAD, XRX, ORCL pay a dividend while SRPT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.