REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PCH vs HD vs LOW vs RYN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Home Improvement
Home Improvement
REIT - Specialty
PCH vs HD vs LOW vs RYN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | Home Improvement | Home Improvement | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $3.23B | $321.11B | $130.68B | $3.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.12B | $164.68B | $86.29B | $678M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $64M | $14.16B | $6.65B | $386M |
| Gross Margin | 15.7% | 33.3% | 33.5% | 27.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 12.7% | 11.8% | 5.5% |
| Forward P/E | 53.8x | 21.5x | 18.5x | 56.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.03B | $19.01B | $7.19B | $1.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $152M | $1.39B | $982M | $843M |
PCH vs HD vs LOW vs RYN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PotlatchDeltic Corp… (PCH) | 100 | 122.8 | +22.8% |
| The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) | 100 | 150.8 | +50.8% |
| Lowe's Companies, I… (LOW) | 100 | 204.9 | +104.9% |
| Rayonier Inc. (RYN) | 100 | 95.7 | -4.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PCH vs HD vs LOW vs RYN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PCH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 3.7% FFO/revenue growth vs RYN's -61.6%
- +15.9% vs HD's -7.5%
HD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.2%, EPS growth -4.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
- 13.5% ROA vs PCH's 2.0%, ROIC 32.1% vs 0.8%
LOW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 249.6% 10Y total return vs HD's 185.4%
- PEG 2.09 vs HD's 6.02
- Lower P/E (18.5x vs 21.5x), PEG 2.09 vs 6.02
RYN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.40, yield 8.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 47.7%, current ratio 3.11x
- Beta 0.40, yield 8.7%, current ratio 3.11x
- 57.0% margin vs PCH's 5.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.7% FFO/revenue growth vs RYN's -61.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.5x vs 21.5x), PEG 2.09 vs 6.02 | |
| Quality / Margins | 57.0% margin vs PCH's 5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs LOW's 0.86 | |
| Dividends | 8.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HD's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.9% vs HD's -7.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.5% ROA vs PCH's 2.0%, ROIC 32.1% vs 0.8% |
PCH vs HD vs LOW vs RYN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PCH vs HD vs LOW vs RYN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LOW leads in 2 of 6 categories
RYN leads 1 • PCH leads 0 • HD leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RYN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HD is the larger business by revenue, generating $164.7B annually — 242.8x RYN's $678M. RYN is the more profitable business, keeping 57.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PCH's 5.8%. On growth, RYN holds the edge at +2.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $164.7B | $86.3B | $678M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $195M | $24.2B | $12.3B | $125M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $64M | $14.2B | $6.7B | $386M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $131M | $12.6B | $7.7B | $191M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +33.3% | +33.5% | +27.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +12.7% | +11.8% | +5.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +8.6% | +7.7% | +57.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +7.7% | +8.9% | +28.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.1% | -3.8% | +10.9% | +2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.9% | -14.6% | -11.0% | -124.2% |
Valuation Metrics
LOW leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.7x trailing earnings, LOW trades at a 87% valuation discount to PCH's 149.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LOW offers better value at 2.22x vs HD's 6.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $321.1B | $130.7B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.1B | $338.7B | $136.9B | $3.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 149.04x | 22.70x | 19.69x | 48.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 53.80x | 21.50x | 18.54x | 56.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.36x | 2.22x | 4.69x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 140.52x | 14.02x | 11.32x | 17.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.04x | 1.95x | 1.51x | 6.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.62x | 25.14x | — | 1.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 47.88x | 25.39x | 17.08x | 15.86x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOW leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HD delivers a 110.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $110 in annual profit, vs $3 for PCH. RYN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HD's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCH scores 6/9 vs HD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.3% | +110.5% | — | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +13.5% | +12.3% | +12.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.8% | +32.1% | +76.2% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +29.8% | +33.6% | +2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 1.48x | — | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $883M | $17.6B | $6.2B | $230M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $152M | $1.4B | $982M | $843M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $19.0B | $7.2B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.28x | 8.71x | 8.90x | 3.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PCH and HD and LOW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LOW five years ago would be worth $12,361 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,139 for RYN. Over the past 12 months, PCH leads with a +15.9% total return vs HD's -7.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HD at 6.7% vs RYN's -2.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.1% | -5.9% | -4.5% | -0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.9% | -7.5% | +6.8% | +3.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.0% | +21.5% | +21.1% | -6.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.6% | +8.0% | +23.6% | -18.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.0% | +185.4% | +249.6% | +39.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.3% | +6.7% | +6.6% | -2.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PCH and RYN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RYN is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LOW's 0.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PCH currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs HD's 75.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.84x | 0.86x | 0.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.61 | $426.75 | $293.06 | $27.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $37.05 | $310.42 | $210.33 | $19.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.5% | +75.7% | +79.6% | +77.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.0 | 36.4 | 35.9 | 43.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 3.6M | 2.3M | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HD and LOW and RYN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PCH as "Hold", HD as "Buy", LOW as "Buy", RYN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.0% upside for RYN (target: $28) vs 22.2% for PCH (target: $51). For income investors, RYN offers the higher dividend yield at 8.69% vs LOW's 2.02%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $51.00 | $408.08 | $288.25 | $27.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 62 | 51 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | +2.8% | +2.0% | +8.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 16 | 16 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.79 | $9.18 | $4.71 | $1.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +2.2% |
LOW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). RYN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
PCH vs HD vs LOW vs RYN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PCH or HD or LOW or RYN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PotlatchDeltic Corporation (PCH) is the stronger pick with 3.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -61. 6% for Rayonier Inc. (RYN). Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (18. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) a "Buy" — based on 62 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PCH or HD or LOW or RYN?
On trailing P/E, Lowe's Companies, Inc.
(LOW) is the cheapest at 19. 7x versus PotlatchDeltic Corporation at 149. 0x. On forward P/E, Lowe's Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Lowe's Companies, Inc. wins at 2. 09x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 6. 02x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PCH or HD or LOW or RYN?
Over the past 5 years, Lowe's Companies, Inc.
(LOW) delivered a total return of +23. 6%, compared to -18. 6% for Rayonier Inc. (RYN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOW returned +249. 6% versus RYN's +39. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PCH or HD or LOW or RYN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rayonier Inc.
(RYN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Lowe's Companies, Inc. 's 0. 86β — meaning LOW is approximately 116% more volatile than RYN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rayonier Inc. (RYN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 148% for The Home Depot, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PCH or HD or LOW or RYN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PotlatchDeltic Corporation (PCH) is pulling ahead at 3.
7% versus -61. 6% for Rayonier Inc. (RYN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lowe's Companies, Inc. grew EPS -3. 1% year-over-year, compared to -81. 6% for Rayonier Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HD leads at 1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PCH or HD or LOW or RYN?
Rayonier Inc.
(RYN) is the more profitable company, earning 97. 9% net margin versus 2. 1% for PotlatchDeltic Corporation — meaning it keeps 97. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RYN leads at 17. 2% versus 3. 1% for PCH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LOW leads at 33. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PCH or HD or LOW or RYN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 09x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 6. 02x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) trades at 18. 5x forward P/E versus 56. 1x for Rayonier Inc. — 37. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RYN: 31. 0% to $27. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — PCH or HD or LOW or RYN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Rayonier Inc. (RYN) offers the highest yield at 8. 7%, versus 2. 0% for Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW).
09Is PCH or HD or LOW or RYN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rayonier Inc.
(RYN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 40), 8. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RYN: +39. 8%, HD: +185. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PCH and HD and LOW and RYN?
These companies operate in different sectors (PCH (Real Estate) and HD (Consumer Cyclical) and LOW (Consumer Cyclical) and RYN (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PCH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HD is a large-cap quality compounder stock; LOW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RYN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.