Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PCOR vs TRMB vs ADSK vs BSY vs CDNS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
PCOR vs TRMB vs ADSK vs BSY vs CDNS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $8.07B | $14.65B | $53.72B | $9.81B | $98.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.37B | $3.69B | $6.78B | $1.56B | $5.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-77M | $456M | $1.12B | $282M | $1.11B |
| Gross Margin | 79.6% | 68.8% | 96.8% | 81.6% | 86.4% |
| Operating Margin | -7.1% | 17.7% | 23.3% | 24.0% | 31.1% |
| Forward P/E | 29.6x | 20.0x | 20.2x | 24.8x | 45.0x |
| Total Debt | $118M | $1.39B | $2.73B | $1.28B | $2.48B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $481M | $253M | $2.25B | $123M | $3.00B |
PCOR vs TRMB vs ADSK vs BSY vs CDNS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Procore Technologie… (PCOR) | 100 | 61.9 | -38.1% |
| Trimble Inc. (TRMB) | 100 | 79.5 | -20.5% |
| Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) | 100 | 87.8 | -12.2% |
| Bentley Systems, In… (BSY) | 100 | 58.6 | -41.4% |
| Cadence Design Syst… (CDNS) | 100 | 281.0 | +181.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PCOR vs TRMB vs ADSK vs BSY vs CDNS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PCOR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 14.8%, EPS growth 6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 9.4%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 1.40, current ratio 1.32x
- 14.8% revenue growth vs TRMB's -2.6%
TRMB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, ADSK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BSY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 0.8%
- PEG 1.63 vs TRMB's 8.15
- Lower P/E (24.8x vs 45.0x), PEG 1.63 vs 3.21
- Beta 0.83 vs CDNS's 1.48
CDNS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 14.1% 10Y total return vs ADSK's 327.0%
- 20.9% margin vs PCOR's -5.6%
- +15.7% vs BSY's -26.7%
- 11.6% ROA vs PCOR's -3.7%, ROIC 25.9% vs -9.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.8% revenue growth vs TRMB's -2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.8x vs 45.0x), PEG 1.63 vs 3.21 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.9% margin vs PCOR's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs CDNS's 1.48 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.7% vs BSY's -26.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.6% ROA vs PCOR's -3.7%, ROIC 25.9% vs -9.7% |
PCOR vs TRMB vs ADSK vs BSY vs CDNS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PCOR vs TRMB vs ADSK vs BSY vs CDNS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRMB leads in 1 of 6 categories
ADSK leads 1 • CDNS leads 1 • BSY leads 1 • PCOR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PCOR and ADSK and CDNS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADSK is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.8B annually — 4.9x PCOR's $1.4B. CDNS is the more profitable business, keeping 20.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PCOR's -5.6%. On growth, PCOR holds the edge at +15.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $3.7B | $6.8B | $1.6B | $5.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16M | $785M | $1.7B | $454M | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$77M | $456M | $1.1B | $282M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $275M | $253M | $2.4B | $492M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.6% | +68.8% | +96.8% | +81.6% | +86.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.1% | +17.7% | +23.3% | +24.0% | +31.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +12.4% | +16.6% | +18.1% | +20.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +6.9% | +35.4% | +31.6% | +30.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.7% | +11.8% | -6.5% | +14.5% | +6.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.7% | +55.6% | +6.0% | +7.1% | +14.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.3x trailing earnings, TRMB trades at a 60% valuation discount to CDNS's 87.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSY offers better value at 2.61x vs TRMB's 14.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.1B | $14.7B | $53.7B | $9.8B | $98.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.7B | $15.8B | $54.2B | $11.0B | $98.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -79.88x | 35.34x | 48.00x | 39.55x | 87.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.64x | 20.01x | 20.22x | 24.75x | 44.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 14.39x | — | 2.61x | 6.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.05x | 34.35x | 25.60x | 52.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.10x | 4.08x | 7.93x | 6.53x | 18.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.37x | 2.54x | 17.73x | 9.41x | 17.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.52x | 110.00x | 22.30x | 18.85x | 62.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ADSK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ADSK delivers a 36.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-6 for PCOR. PCOR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BSY's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BSY scores 9/9 vs PCOR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.3% | +8.0% | +36.9% | +23.6% | +21.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.7% | +5.0% | +9.0% | +8.1% | +11.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.7% | +6.8% | +33.3% | +11.4% | +25.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.6% | +7.8% | +25.6% | +14.0% | +20.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.24x | 0.90x | 1.08x | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$362M | $1.1B | $485M | $1.2B | -$521M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $481M | $253M | $2.2B | $123M | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $118M | $1.4B | $2.7B | $1.3B | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -43.00x | 12.26x | 289.00x | 14.07x | 14.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CDNS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CDNS five years ago would be worth $27,656 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,082 for PCOR. Over the past 12 months, CDNS leads with a +15.7% total return vs BSY's -26.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDNS at 20.2% vs BSY's -6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.6% | -21.0% | -12.4% | -11.7% | +15.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.0% | -6.7% | -11.4% | -26.7% | +15.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.3% | +30.1% | +30.8% | -18.3% | +73.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.2% | -22.0% | -12.1% | -28.6% | +176.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.2% | +166.8% | +327.0% | +3.6% | +1411.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.1% | +9.2% | +9.4% | -6.5% | +20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BSY and CDNS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BSY is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDNS's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDNS currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs BSY's 56.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 1.46x | 0.85x | 0.83x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $82.32 | $87.50 | $329.09 | $59.25 | $376.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $46.08 | $61.63 | $214.10 | $30.83 | $262.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.0% | +70.7% | +76.3% | +56.7% | +94.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 36.8 | 52.4 | 39.8 | 70.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 1.7M | 1.9M | 2.7M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
BSY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PCOR as "Buy", TRMB as "Buy", ADSK as "Buy", BSY as "Buy", CDNS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 53.6% upside for TRMB (target: $95) vs 3.9% for CDNS (target: $371). BSY is the only dividend payer here at 0.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.67 | $95.00 | $338.00 | $47.57 | $370.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 28 | 51 | 12 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.26 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +5.9% | +2.6% | +1.6% | +0.9% |
TRMB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). ADSK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
PCOR vs TRMB vs ADSK vs BSY vs CDNS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PCOR or TRMB or ADSK or BSY or CDNS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Procore Technologies, Inc.
(PCOR) is the stronger pick with 14. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 6% for Trimble Inc. (TRMB). Trimble Inc. (TRMB) offers the better valuation at 35. 3x trailing P/E (20. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Procore Technologies, Inc. (PCOR) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PCOR or TRMB or ADSK or BSY or CDNS?
On trailing P/E, Trimble Inc.
(TRMB) is the cheapest at 35. 3x versus Cadence Design Systems, Inc. at 87. 9x. On forward P/E, Trimble Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bentley Systems, Incorporated wins at 1. 63x versus Trimble Inc. 's 8. 15x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PCOR or TRMB or ADSK or BSY or CDNS?
Over the past 5 years, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
(CDNS) delivered a total return of +176. 6%, compared to -39. 2% for Procore Technologies, Inc. (PCOR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CDNS returned +1412% versus PCOR's -39. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PCOR or TRMB or ADSK or BSY or CDNS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bentley Systems, Incorporated (BSY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Cadence Design Systems, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning CDNS is approximately 78% more volatile than BSY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Procore Technologies, Inc. (PCOR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 108% for Bentley Systems, Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PCOR or TRMB or ADSK or BSY or CDNS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Procore Technologies, Inc.
(PCOR) is pulling ahead at 14. 8% versus -2. 6% for Trimble Inc. (TRMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bentley Systems, Incorporated grew EPS 18. 1% year-over-year, compared to -71. 3% for Trimble Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PCOR leads at 22. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PCOR or TRMB or ADSK or BSY or CDNS?
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
(CDNS) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 9% net margin versus -7. 6% for Procore Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CDNS leads at 31. 1% versus -8. 9% for PCOR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADSK leads at 96. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PCOR or TRMB or ADSK or BSY or CDNS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bentley Systems, Incorporated (BSY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 63x versus Trimble Inc. 's 8. 15x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Trimble Inc. (TRMB) trades at 20. 0x forward P/E versus 45. 0x for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. — 24. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRMB: 53. 6% to $95. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PCOR or TRMB or ADSK or BSY or CDNS?
In this comparison, BSY (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. PCOR, TRMB, ADSK, CDNS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PCOR or TRMB or ADSK or BSY or CDNS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bentley Systems, Incorporated (BSY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 0. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BSY: +3. 6%, PCOR: -39. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PCOR and TRMB and ADSK and BSY and CDNS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
BSY pays a dividend while PCOR, TRMB, ADSK, CDNS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.