Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PCSC vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE vs AMZN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PCSC
Perceptive Capital Solutions Corp Class A Ordinary Shares

Shell Companies

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • KY
Market Cap$94M
5Y Perf.+12.1%
BFLY
Butterfly Network, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.11B
5Y Perf.+404.3%
SONO
Sonos, Inc.

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.80B
5Y Perf.+0.9%
PSFE
Paysafe Limited

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • GB
Market Cap$485M
5Y Perf.-46.9%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.92T
5Y Perf.+40.3%

PCSC vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE vs AMZN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PCSC logoPCSC
BFLY logoBFLY
SONO logoSONO
PSFE logoPSFE
AMZN logoAMZN
IndustryShell CompaniesMedical - DevicesConsumer ElectronicsInformation Technology ServicesSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$94M$1.11B$1.80B$485M$2.92T
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$103M$1.46B$1.70B$742.78B
Net Income (TTM)$2M$-76M$-41M$-183M$90.80B
Gross Margin49.2%44.8%52.4%50.6%
Operating Margin-79.5%2.0%5.6%11.5%
Forward P/E37.6x47.3x4.3x34.8x
Total Debt$0.00$20M$60M$2.66B$152.99B
Cash & Equiv.$1M$150M$175M$1.35B$86.81B

PCSC vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE vs AMZNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PCSC
BFLY
SONO
PSFE
AMZN
StockJun 24May 26Return
Perceptive Capital … (PCSC)100112.1+12.1%
Butterfly Network, … (BFLY)100504.3+404.3%
Sonos, Inc. (SONO)100100.9+0.9%
Paysafe Limited (PSFE)10053.1-46.9%
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)100140.3+40.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PCSC vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE vs AMZN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BFLY and AMZN are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Amazon.com, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. PCSC and PSFE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PCSC
Perceptive Capital Solutions Corp Class A Ordinary Shares
The Banking Pick

PCSC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.22
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.22, current ratio 5.90x
  • Beta 0.22, current ratio 5.90x
  • Beta 0.22 vs BFLY's 3.28
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BFLY
Butterfly Network, Inc.
The Growth Play

BFLY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 8.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
  • 19.0% revenue growth vs SONO's -4.9%
  • +94.5% vs PSFE's -37.1%
Best for: growth exposure
SONO
Sonos, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SONO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
PSFE
Paysafe Limited
The Value Play

PSFE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (4.3x vs 34.8x)
Best for: value
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

AMZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 7.0% 10Y total return vs PCSC's 12.2%
  • 12.2% margin vs BFLY's -73.6%
  • 11.5% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6%, ROIC 14.7% vs -76.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBFLY logoBFLY19.0% revenue growth vs SONO's -4.9%
ValuePSFE logoPSFELower P/E (4.3x vs 34.8x)
Quality / MarginsAMZN logoAMZN12.2% margin vs BFLY's -73.6%
Stability / SafetyPCSC logoPCSCBeta 0.22 vs BFLY's 3.28
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BFLY logoBFLY+94.5% vs PSFE's -37.1%
Efficiency (ROA)AMZN logoAMZN11.5% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6%, ROIC 14.7% vs -76.8%

PCSC vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PCSCPerceptive Capital Solutions Corp Class A Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

BFLYButterfly Network, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
65.0%$63M
Software And Other Services
35.0%$34M
SONOSonos, Inc.
FY 2025
Sonos Speakers
77.7%$1.1B
Sonos System Products
17.3%$249M
Partner Products And Other Revenue
5.0%$72M
PSFEPaysafe Limited
FY 2025
Merchant Solutions
52.6%$905M
Digital Wallet Segments
47.4%$815M
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
FY 2025
Online Stores
37.6%$269.3B
Third-Party Seller Services
24.0%$172.2B
Amazon Web Services
18.0%$128.7B
Advertising Services
9.6%$68.6B
Subscription Services
6.9%$49.6B
Physical Stores
3.1%$22.6B
Other Services
0.8%$5.9B

PCSC vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE vs AMZN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMZNLAGGINGSONO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMZN and PCSC operate at a comparable scale, with $742.8B and $0 in trailing revenue. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BFLY's -73.6%. On growth, BFLY holds the edge at +25.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPCSC logoPCSCPerceptive Capita…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.PSFE logoPSFEPaysafe LimitedAMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$103M$1.5B$1.7B$742.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$480,446-$76M$61M$371M$155.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2M-$76M-$41M-$183M$90.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$991,185-$19M$118M$136M-$2.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+49.2%+44.8%+52.4%+50.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-79.5%+2.0%+5.6%+11.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-73.6%-2.8%-10.7%+12.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-18.3%+8.1%+8.0%-0.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+25.0%+8.4%+4.4%+16.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-88.7%+16.0%-29.3%-183.3%+74.8%
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PSFE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 37.6x trailing earnings, PCSC trades at a 1% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PSFE's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SONO's 142.1x.

MetricPCSC logoPCSCPerceptive Capita…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.PSFE logoPSFEPaysafe LimitedAMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$94M$1.1B$1.8B$485M$2.92T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$93M$979M$1.7B$1.8B$2.98T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS37.60x-13.68x-29.20x-2.99x37.82x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.47.27x4.30x34.77x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.35x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple48.70x142.14x4.53x20.47x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue11.37x1.25x0.29x4.07x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.09x5.35x5.06x0.83x7.14x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.64x2.17x378.98x
PSFE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-37 for BFLY. BFLY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSFE's 4.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs BFLY's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricPCSC logoPCSCPerceptive Capita…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.PSFE logoPSFEPaysafe LimitedAMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.8%-36.8%-10.4%-24.1%+23.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.6%-25.6%-4.8%-3.8%+11.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-76.8%-13.4%+3.6%+14.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.6%-39.3%-9.9%+3.6%+15.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–933446
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x0.17x4.06x0.37x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1M-$130M-$115M$1.3B$66.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$150M$175M$1.3B$86.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$20M$60M$2.7B$153.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-71.59x2587.88x0.84x39.96x
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, BFLY leads with a +94.5% total return vs PSFE's -37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs PSFE's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPCSC logoPCSCPerceptive Capita…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.PSFE logoPSFEPaysafe LimitedAMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-13.2%+13.1%-14.9%+17.7%+19.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+9.1%+94.5%+66.0%-37.1%+43.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+12.2%+100.9%-31.6%-34.9%+156.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+12.2%-65.1%-60.4%-94.2%+64.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+12.2%-57.2%-25.2%-92.1%+697.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+3.9%+26.2%-11.9%-13.3%+36.8%
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PCSC and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PCSC is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFLY's 3.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs PSFE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPCSC logoPCSCPerceptive Capita…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.PSFE logoPSFEPaysafe LimitedAMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.22x3.28x1.75x2.35x1.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.47$5.72$19.82$16.49$278.56
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.31$1.32$8.73$5.95$185.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.0%+74.1%+75.1%+56.9%+97.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.046.256.165.381.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded64K6.4M1.3M361K45.5M
Evenly matched — PCSC and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: BFLY as "Buy", SONO as "Buy", PSFE as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.0% upside for SONO (target: $20) vs 6.5% for PSFE (target: $10).

MetricPCSC logoPCSCPerceptive Capita…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.PSFE logoPSFEPaysafe LimitedAMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.42$19.50$10.00$306.77
# AnalystsCovering analysts791194
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+4.5%+20.9%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PSFE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallAmazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PCSC vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PCSC or BFLY or SONO or PSFE or AMZN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Butterfly Network, Inc.

(BFLY) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Sonos, Inc. (SONO). Perceptive Capital Solutions Corp Class A Ordinary Shares (PCSC) offers the better valuation at 37. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PCSC or BFLY or SONO or PSFE or AMZN?

On trailing P/E, Perceptive Capital Solutions Corp Class A Ordinary Shares (PCSC) is the cheapest at 37.

6x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, Paysafe Limited is actually cheaper at 4. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PCSC or BFLY or SONO or PSFE or AMZN?

Over the past 5 years, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -94. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus PSFE's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PCSC or BFLY or SONO or PSFE or AMZN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perceptive Capital Solutions Corp Class A Ordinary Shares (PCSC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

22β versus Butterfly Network, Inc. 's 3. 28β — meaning BFLY is approximately 1421% more volatile than PCSC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 4% for Paysafe Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PCSC or BFLY or SONO or PSFE or AMZN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Butterfly Network, Inc.

(BFLY) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -4. 9% for Sonos, Inc. (SONO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PCSC or BFLY or SONO or PSFE or AMZN?

Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -79. 0% for Butterfly Network, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -88. 5% for BFLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PCSC or BFLY or SONO or PSFE or AMZN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Paysafe Limited (PSFE) trades at 4.

3x forward P/E versus 47. 3x for Sonos, Inc. — 43. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SONO: 31. 0% to $19. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PCSC or BFLY or SONO or PSFE or AMZN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is PCSC or BFLY or SONO or PSFE or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Perceptive Capital Solutions Corp Class A Ordinary Shares (PCSC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

22)). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PCSC: +12. 2%, PSFE: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PCSC and BFLY and SONO and PSFE and AMZN?

These companies operate in different sectors (PCSC (Financial Services) and BFLY (Healthcare) and SONO (Technology) and PSFE (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PCSC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BFLY is a small-cap high-growth stock; SONO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PSFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PCSC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BFLY

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SONO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PSFE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 31%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMZN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.