Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PCSC vs NHIC vs PSFE vs BFLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Information Technology Services
Medical - Devices
PCSC vs NHIC vs PSFE vs BFLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Asset Management | Information Technology Services | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $94M | $220M | $485M | $1.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $1.70B | $103M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $3M | $-183M | $-76M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 52.4% | 49.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | 5.6% | -79.5% |
| Forward P/E | 37.6x | 524.4x | 4.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 | $2.66B | $20M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $986K | $1.35B | $150M |
PCSC vs NHIC vs PSFE vs BFLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perceptive Capital … (PCSC) | 100 | 108.5 | +8.5% |
| NewHold Investment … (NHIC) | 100 | 105.5 | +5.5% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 60.9 | -39.1% |
| Butterfly Network, … (BFLY) | 100 | 177.8 | +77.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PCSC vs NHIC vs PSFE vs BFLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PCSC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 12.2% 10Y total return vs NHIC's 6.1%
- 2.6% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6%
NHIC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.03
- Lower volatility, beta 0.03, current ratio 9.74x
- Beta 0.03, current ratio 9.74x
- NIM 1.3% vs PCSC's 0.0%
PSFE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
BFLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 8.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
- 19.0% revenue growth vs PSFE's -0.2%
- +94.5% vs PSFE's -37.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs PSFE's -0.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.3% margin vs BFLY's -73.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs BFLY's 3.28 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +94.5% vs PSFE's -37.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6% |
PCSC vs NHIC vs PSFE vs BFLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PCSC vs NHIC vs PSFE vs BFLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PSFE leads in 3 of 6 categories
BFLY leads 1 • NHIC leads 1 • PCSC leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSFE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSFE and NHIC operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. PSFE is the more profitable business, keeping -10.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BFLY's -73.6%. On growth, BFLY holds the edge at +25.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $1.7B | $103M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$480,446 | $833,081 | $371M | -$76M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $3M | -$183M | -$76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$991,185 | -$2M | $136M | -$19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +52.4% | +49.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | +5.6% | -79.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | -10.7% | -73.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | +8.0% | -18.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +4.4% | +25.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -88.7% | — | -183.3% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 37.6x trailing earnings, PCSC trades at a 93% valuation discount to NHIC's 524.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PSFE's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PCSC's 48.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $94M | $220M | $485M | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $93M | $219M | $1.8B | $979M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.60x | 524.38x | -2.99x | -13.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 4.25x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 48.70x | — | 4.53x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 0.29x | 11.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.09x | 1.07x | 0.83x | 5.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 2.17x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PSFE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PCSC delivers a 2.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-37 for BFLY. BFLY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSFE's 4.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NHIC scores 4/9 vs BFLY's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.8% | +1.6% | -24.1% | -36.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +1.5% | -3.8% | -25.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -0.7% | +3.6% | -76.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | -0.9% | +3.6% | -39.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 4.06x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$986,000 | $1.3B | -$130M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $986,000 | $1.3B | $150M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 | $2.7B | $20M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 0.84x | -71.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BFLY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PCSC five years ago would be worth $11,224 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, BFLY leads with a +94.5% total return vs PSFE's -37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BFLY at 26.2% vs PSFE's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.2% | +1.7% | +17.7% | +13.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.1% | +5.2% | -37.1% | +94.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.2% | +6.1% | -34.9% | +100.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.2% | +6.1% | -94.2% | -65.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.2% | +6.1% | -92.1% | -57.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.9% | +2.0% | -13.3% | +26.2% |
Risk & Volatility
NHIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NHIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFLY's 3.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NHIC currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs PSFE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | 0.03x | 2.33x | 3.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.47 | $10.87 | $16.49 | $5.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.31 | $9.99 | $5.95 | $1.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.0% | +97.0% | +56.9% | +74.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.0 | 69.1 | 65.3 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 64K | 20K | 361K | 6.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PSFE as "Buy", BFLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.8% upside for BFLY (target: $5) vs 6.5% for PSFE (target: $10).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $10.00 | $5.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 11 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +20.9% | 0.0% |
PSFE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BFLY leads in 1 (Total Returns).
PCSC vs NHIC vs PSFE vs BFLY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PCSC or NHIC or PSFE or BFLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Butterfly Network, Inc.
(BFLY) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Perceptive Capital Solutions Corp Class A Ordinary Shares (PCSC) offers the better valuation at 37. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Paysafe Limited (PSFE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PCSC or NHIC or PSFE or BFLY?
On trailing P/E, Perceptive Capital Solutions Corp Class A Ordinary Shares (PCSC) is the cheapest at 37.
6x versus NewHold Investment Corp III at 524. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PCSC or NHIC or PSFE or BFLY?
Over the past 5 years, Perceptive Capital Solutions Corp Class A Ordinary Shares (PCSC) delivered a total return of +12.
2%, compared to -94. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PCSC returned +12. 2% versus PSFE's -92. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PCSC or NHIC or PSFE or BFLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
03β versus Butterfly Network, Inc. 's 3. 23β — meaning BFLY is approximately 11397% more volatile than NHIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 4% for Paysafe Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PCSC or NHIC or PSFE or BFLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Butterfly Network, Inc.
(BFLY) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NewHold Investment Corp III grew EPS 131. 2% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, BFLY leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PCSC or NHIC or PSFE or BFLY?
Perceptive Capital Solutions Corp Class A Ordinary Shares (PCSC) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -79. 0% for Butterfly Network, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSFE leads at 7. 2% versus -88. 5% for BFLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BFLY leads at 46. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PCSC or NHIC or PSFE or BFLY more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BFLY: 27.
8% to $5. 42.
08Which pays a better dividend — PCSC or NHIC or PSFE or BFLY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PCSC or NHIC or PSFE or BFLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
03)). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 33 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NHIC: +6. 1%, PSFE: -92. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PCSC and NHIC and PSFE and BFLY?
These companies operate in different sectors (PCSC (Financial Services) and NHIC (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology) and BFLY (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PCSC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NHIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PSFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BFLY is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.