Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PDD vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
PDD vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $151.33B | $93.34B | $2.96T | $341.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $418.54B | $28.89B | $742.78B | $1.01T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $102.27B | $2.00B | $90.80B | $123.35B |
| Gross Margin | 56.6% | 44.5% | 50.6% | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | 22.1% | 11.1% | 11.5% | 10.9% |
| Forward P/E | 1.2x | 38.6x | 35.3x | 4.1x |
| Total Debt | $10.61B | $11.39B | $152.99B | $248.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $57.77B | $3.67B | $86.81B | $181.73B |
PDD vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDD Holdings Inc. (PDD) | 100 | 153.0 | +53.0% |
| MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) | 100 | 216.2 | +116.2% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 225.1 | +125.1% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 68.2 | -31.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PDD vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PDD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.14
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth 84.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 61.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 2.21x
- Beta 1.14, current ratio 2.21x
MELI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 13.4% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.2%
AMZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +48.6% vs MELI's -17.4%
BABA is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs BABA's 5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.2x vs 4.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.4% margin vs MELI's 6.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.14 vs AMZN's 1.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.6% vs MELI's -17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.7% ROA vs MELI's 5.7%, ROIC 40.3% vs 20.8% |
PDD vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PDD vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PDD leads in 3 of 6 categories
AMZN leads 1 • BABA leads 1 • MELI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PDD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.01T annually — 35.0x MELI's $28.9B. PDD is the more profitable business, keeping 24.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MELI's 6.9%. On growth, MELI holds the edge at +44.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $418.5B | $28.9B | $742.8B | $1.01T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $93.0B | $4.0B | $155.9B | $114.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $102.3B | $2.0B | $90.8B | $123.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $111.4B | $10.1B | -$2.5B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.6% | +44.5% | +50.6% | +41.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.1% | +11.1% | +11.5% | +10.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +6.9% | +12.2% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | +35.0% | -0.3% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.0% | +44.6% | +16.6% | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.5% | -12.5% | +74.8% | -52.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PDD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, PDD trades at a 80% valuation discount to MELI's 46.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PDD's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MELI's 26.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $151.3B | $93.3B | $2.96T | $341.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $144.4B | $101.1B | $3.02T | $351.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.18x | 46.74x | 38.35x | 17.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.24x | 38.60x | 35.26x | 4.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.37x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.02x | 26.79x | 20.74x | 13.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.62x | 3.23x | 4.12x | 2.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.29x | 13.83x | 7.24x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.53x | 8.66x | 384.26x | 29.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PDD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MELI delivers a 33.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $11 for BABA. PDD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MELI's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PDD scores 7/9 vs MELI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +26.1% | +33.7% | +23.3% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.7% | +5.7% | +11.5% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +40.3% | +20.8% | +14.7% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +42.4% | +28.3% | +15.3% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 1.69x | 0.37x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$47.2B | $7.7B | $66.2B | $66.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $57.8B | $3.7B | $86.8B | $181.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.6B | $11.4B | $153.0B | $248.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 17.53x | 39.96x | 15.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,453 for BABA. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +48.6% total return vs MELI's -17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 37.5% vs MELI's 12.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.6% | -6.7% | +21.4% | -9.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.1% | -17.4% | +48.6% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.1% | +43.3% | +159.8% | +75.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.0% | +27.3% | +66.3% | -35.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +283.2% | +1338.9% | +715.9% | +84.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.2% | +12.8% | +37.5% | +20.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PDD and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PDD is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs MELI's 69.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 1.20x | 1.51x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $139.41 | $2645.22 | $278.56 | $192.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $95.24 | $1593.21 | $183.85 | $103.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.4% | +69.6% | +98.7% | +73.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.1 | 51.9 | 80.5 | 49.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.6M | 505K | 45.6M | 10.3M |
Analyst Outlook
BABA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PDD as "Buy", MELI as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", BABA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.8% upside for PDD (target: $142) vs 11.6% for AMZN (target: $307). BABA is the only dividend payer here at 1.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $142.00 | $2420.00 | $306.77 | $194.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 33 | 94 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $12.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +3.8% |
PDD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AMZN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
PDD vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PDD or MELI or AMZN or BABA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). PDD Holdings Inc. (PDD) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (1. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PDD Holdings Inc. (PDD) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PDD or MELI or AMZN or BABA?
On trailing P/E, PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus MercadoLibre, Inc. at 46. 7x. On forward P/E, PDD Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PDD or MELI or AMZN or BABA?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +66. 3%, compared to -35. 5% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MELI returned +1339% versus BABA's +84. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PDD or MELI or AMZN or BABA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 14β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 33% more volatile than PDD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PDD Holdings Inc. (PDD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 169% for MercadoLibre, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PDD or MELI or AMZN or BABA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus 5. 9% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PDD Holdings Inc. grew EPS 84. 8% year-over-year, compared to 4. 5% for MercadoLibre, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PDD leads at 61. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PDD or MELI or AMZN or BABA?
PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 5% net margin versus 6. 9% for MercadoLibre, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PDD leads at 27. 5% versus 11. 1% for MELI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PDD leads at 60. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PDD or MELI or AMZN or BABA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) trades at 1. 2x forward P/E versus 38. 6x for MercadoLibre, Inc. — 37. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PDD: 38. 8% to $142. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PDD or MELI or AMZN or BABA?
In this comparison, BABA (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. PDD, MELI, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PDD or MELI or AMZN or BABA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), +1339% 10Y return). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MELI: +1339%, AMZN: +715. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PDD and MELI and AMZN and BABA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PDD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MELI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock. BABA pays a dividend while PDD, MELI, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.