Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PDPA vs BX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
PDPA vs BX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $202M | $97.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $13.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $3.02B |
| Gross Margin | 99.6% | 86.0% |
| Operating Margin | 86.6% | 51.9% |
| Forward P/E | 29.7x | 20.9x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $13.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $188K | $2.63B |
PDPA vs BX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pearl Diver Credit … (PDPA) | 100 | 101.4 | +1.4% |
| Blackstone Inc. (BX) | 100 | 72.3 | -27.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PDPA vs BX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PDPA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.00
- Rev growth 6.8%, EPS growth -22.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.00, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 0.04x
BX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 487.1% 10Y total return vs PDPA's 13.5%
- Lower P/E (20.9x vs 29.7x)
- 6.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.8% NII/revenue growth vs BX's 21.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.9x vs 29.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs BX's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.00 vs BX's 1.53, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.7% vs BX's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs BX's 0.3% |
PDPA vs BX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PDPA vs BX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PDPA leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BX is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.8B annually — 790.8x PDPA's $17M. PDPA is the more profitable business, keeping 86.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BX's 21.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $13.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $7.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $3.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $3.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.6% | +86.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +86.6% | +51.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +86.6% | +21.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.6% | +12.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +41.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PDPA leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.7x trailing earnings, PDPA trades at a 8% valuation discount to BX's 32.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PDPA's 13.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BX's 15.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $202M | $97.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $208M | $108.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.69x | 32.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.54x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.75x | 15.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.54x | 7.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 4.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 55.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PDPA leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BX delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $13 for PDPA. PDPA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BX's 0.61x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.1% | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.0% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.5% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.5% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $10.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $188,056 | $2.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $13.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 214.34x | 14.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BX five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,351 for PDPA. Over the past 12 months, PDPA leads with a +10.7% total return vs BX's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BX at 19.1% vs PDPA's 4.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.8% | -19.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.7% | -3.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.5% | +68.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.5% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.5% | +487.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.3% | +19.1% |
Risk & Volatility
PDPA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PDPA is the less volatile stock with a 0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BX's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PDPA currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs BX's 65.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.00x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.15 | $190.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.51 | $101.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.5% | +65.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.5 | 51.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 7.2M |
Analyst Outlook
BX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
BX is the only dividend payer here at 6.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $156.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $7.70 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
PDPA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BX leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook).
PDPA vs BX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PDPA or BX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc.
(PDPA) is the stronger pick with 679. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 21. 6% for Blackstone Inc. (BX). Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc. (PDPA) offers the better valuation at 29. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Blackstone Inc. (BX) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PDPA or BX?
On trailing P/E, Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc.
(PDPA) is the cheapest at 29. 7x versus Blackstone Inc. at 32. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PDPA or BX?
Over the past 5 years, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to +13. 5% for Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc. (PDPA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BX returned +487. 1% versus PDPA's +13. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PDPA or BX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc.
(PDPA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 00β versus Blackstone Inc. 's 1. 53β — meaning BX is approximately 306180% more volatile than PDPA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc. (PDPA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 61% for Blackstone Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PDPA or BX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc.
(PDPA) is pulling ahead at 679. 8% versus 21. 6% for Blackstone Inc. (BX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Inc. grew EPS 7. 2% year-over-year, compared to -22. 0% for Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PDPA or BX?
Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc.
(PDPA) is the more profitable company, earning 86. 6% net margin versus 21. 8% for Blackstone Inc. — meaning it keeps 86. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PDPA leads at 86. 6% versus 51. 9% for BX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PDPA leads at 99. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — PDPA or BX?
In this comparison, BX (6.
2% yield) pays a dividend. PDPA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is PDPA or BX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc.
(PDPA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 00)). Blackstone Inc. (BX) carries a higher beta of 1. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PDPA: +13. 5%, BX: +487. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PDPA and BX?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
BX pays a dividend while PDPA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.