Waste Management
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PESI vs NVRI vs CLH vs CWST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
Waste Management
Waste Management
PESI vs NVRI vs CLH vs CWST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Waste Management | Waste Management | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $207M | $1.59B | $15.04B | $5.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $59M | $2.24B | $6.06B | $1.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $-171M | $395M | $7M |
| Gross Margin | 4.1% | 19.2% | 30.0% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | -26.3% | 1.0% | 11.2% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 33.4x | 63.9x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $1.81B | $3.45B | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $104M | $826M | $124M |
PESI vs NVRI vs CLH vs CWST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 199.8 | +99.8% |
| Enviri Corporation (NVRI) | 100 | 172.1 | +72.1% |
| Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) | 100 | 474.9 | +374.9% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 167.7 | +67.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PESI vs NVRI vs CLH vs CWST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PESI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NVRI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 0.0% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- +170.5% vs CWST's -28.9%
CLH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 496.4% 10Y total return vs CWST's 10.6%
- Beta 0.70, current ratio 2.33x
- Lower P/E (33.4x vs 63.9x)
- 6.5% margin vs PESI's -30.1%
CWST is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.32
- Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth -47.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 79.0%, current ratio 1.26x
- 18.0% revenue growth vs NVRI's -4.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.0% revenue growth vs NVRI's -4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (33.4x vs 63.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.5% margin vs PESI's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs PESI's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +170.5% vs CWST's -28.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 9.8% vs -21.7% |
PESI vs NVRI vs CLH vs CWST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PESI vs NVRI vs CLH vs CWST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CLH leads in 3 of 6 categories
PESI leads 0 • NVRI leads 0 • CWST leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 102.9x PESI's $59M. CLH is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PESI's -30.1%. On growth, CWST holds the edge at +9.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $59M | $2.2B | $6.1B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | $204M | $1.1B | $414M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | -$171M | $395M | $7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | -$40M | $467M | $102M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +19.2% | +30.0% | +17.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.3% | +1.0% | +11.2% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -30.1% | -7.6% | +6.5% | +0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.4% | -1.8% | +7.7% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.1% | -0.4% | +1.9% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -110.5% | -1.9% | +9.2% | -18.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NVRI and CLH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 38.7x trailing earnings, CLH trades at a 95% valuation discount to CWST's 712.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NVRI's 12.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CWST's 15.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $207M | $1.6B | $15.0B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $200M | $3.3B | $17.7B | $6.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.89x | -9.23x | 38.74x | 712.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 33.43x | 63.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.57x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.15x | 15.73x | 15.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.36x | 0.71x | 2.49x | 2.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.11x | 5.24x | 5.48x | 3.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 34.04x | 63.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLH delivers a 14.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-44 for NVRI. PESI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVRI's 6.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PESI scores 5/9 vs NVRI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -34.5% | -43.7% | +14.4% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.2% | -6.2% | +5.2% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -21.7% | +3.3% | +9.8% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.7% | +4.2% | +10.6% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 6.11x | 1.26x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | $1.7B | $2.6B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $104M | $826M | $124M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $1.8B | $3.4B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -42.14x | -0.10x | 6.34x | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLH five years ago would be worth $29,882 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,517 for NVRI. Over the past 12 months, NVRI leads with a +170.5% total return vs CWST's -28.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLH at 27.3% vs CWST's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.8% | +7.3% | +15.9% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.2% | +170.5% | +26.7% | -28.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.7% | +105.2% | +106.2% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.6% | -14.8% | +198.8% | +25.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.6% | +191.4% | +496.4% | +1059.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.8% | +27.1% | +27.3% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVRI and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWST is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVRI currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs PESI's 67.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.85x | 1.18x | 0.70x | 0.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.50 | $19.98 | $316.98 | $121.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.02 | $6.87 | $201.34 | $74.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.7% | +96.1% | +89.0% | +70.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.5 | 49.3 | 37.9 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 164K | 1.1M | 504K | 874K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PESI and CWST each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PESI as "Hold", NVRI as "Buy", CLH as "Buy", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 6.1% for CLH (target: $299).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $25.00 | $299.33 | $119.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 9 | 27 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% | 0.0% |
CLH leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
PESI vs NVRI vs CLH vs CWST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PESI or NVRI or CLH or CWST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Enviri Corporation (NVRI). Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) offers the better valuation at 38. 7x trailing P/E (33. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enviri Corporation (NVRI) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PESI or NVRI or CLH or CWST?
On trailing P/E, Clean Harbors, Inc.
(CLH) is the cheapest at 38. 7x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 1x. On forward P/E, Clean Harbors, Inc. is actually cheaper at 33. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PESI or NVRI or CLH or CWST?
Over the past 5 years, Clean Harbors, Inc.
(CLH) delivered a total return of +198. 8%, compared to -14. 8% for Enviri Corporation (NVRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus PESI's +178. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PESI or NVRI or CLH or CWST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 472% more volatile than CWST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 6% for Enviri Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PESI or NVRI or CLH or CWST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus -4. 3% for Enviri Corporation (NVRI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to -47. 8% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PESI or NVRI or CLH or CWST?
Clean Harbors, Inc.
(CLH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus -22. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLH leads at 11. 2% versus -19. 0% for PESI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLH leads at 29. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PESI or NVRI or CLH or CWST more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Clean Harbors, Inc.
(CLH) trades at 33. 4x forward P/E versus 63. 9x for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — 30. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61. 1% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PESI or NVRI or CLH or CWST?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PESI or NVRI or CLH or CWST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +1059% 10Y return). Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, PESI: +178. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PESI and NVRI and CLH and CWST?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.